IM4ERISA Posted November 8, 2022 Posted November 8, 2022 I have a client who allows its employees to make a choice about cashing out their PTO bank or accruing additional time. This no doubt triggers the constructive receipt doctrine. Is it possible to use a haircut provision of 10% as a "substantial limitation" to work around the constructive receipt issue? I know that these provisions were common in deferred compensation arrangements pre-409A. However, I don't believe the IRS ever explicitly accepted the haircut approach but after losing several court battles opted for a non-enforcement approach. As such, I am inclined to advise them against using a haircut provision. Any input would be appreciated.
Lois Baker Posted November 8, 2022 Posted November 8, 2022 Ran across this article just this morning; it may or may not be helpful: https://www.employeebenefitslawblog.com/you-cant-touch-that-permitting-cashouts-of-pto-may-create-tax-traps-for-employees-and-employers/
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now