IM4ERISA Posted November 8, 2022 Share Posted November 8, 2022 I have a client who allows its employees to make a choice about cashing out their PTO bank or accruing additional time. This no doubt triggers the constructive receipt doctrine. Is it possible to use a haircut provision of 10% as a "substantial limitation" to work around the constructive receipt issue? I know that these provisions were common in deferred compensation arrangements pre-409A. However, I don't believe the IRS ever explicitly accepted the haircut approach but after losing several court battles opted for a non-enforcement approach. As such, I am inclined to advise them against using a haircut provision. Any input would be appreciated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lois Baker Posted November 8, 2022 Share Posted November 8, 2022 Ran across this article just this morning; it may or may not be helpful: https://www.employeebenefitslawblog.com/you-cant-touch-that-permitting-cashouts-of-pto-may-create-tax-traps-for-employees-and-employers/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IM4ERISA Posted November 9, 2022 Author Share Posted November 9, 2022 Thank you! This very helpful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now