Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a small defined benefit plan that has been frozen to new entrants for a few years. It is no longer passing the ratio% test. Based on the numbers it would be a nondiscriminatory classification but is the set of employees hired before a certain date a reasonable classification? The formula is a safe harbor formula so the plan still passes 401(a)(4) by itself. Of course if i cannot get the sb plan to pass the average benefits tests I will move onto testing on a combined plan basis with the dc plan for which coverage will not be an issue. 

 

Posted

Yes, hire date is a reasonable classification.  The employer has no discretion over who is or is not in the group going forward, it's not based on age, and it is definitely determinable. 

Posted

I assume the closed db plan passes 401(a)(26)?  

The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.

Posted

The plan passes 401(a)(26) testing in 2023 if noone terminates. However, I think now the plan satisfies the 401(a)(26) relief conditions of the Secure Act. Hence, the main focus is on coverage and nondiscrimination testing.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use