Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

A newly formed Cash Balance Plan has in the first year a 415(b) accrual limit of $275,000 x (1/10) = $27,500.  In the second year the 415(b) accrual limit is $275,000 x (2/10) = $55,000 which is double (assuming no 415(b) $lim increase.  Does the 133 1/3 accrual rule limit the second year accrual  to 133 1/3 times the first year accrual?

Posted

No

The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

If the benefit formula in the plan is written, for example, to accrue a benefit payable beginning at retirement at a rate of $27,500 per year, and the participant accrued that same formula year after year, then they are accruing at a rate of exactly 100% of the actual rate that they earned in any prior year under the plan’s written benefit formula.

If, instead, the formula was written to be $5,000 per year for the first 5 years and $15,000 per year thereafter, then the 133-1/3 accrual rule is not met. Accruals in years 6 are thereafter are more that 133-1/3 percent more than the accruals in at least one of the prior years under the formula.

But fret not, you may amend the plan with a fresh start date instead and the adoption of the new formula can be designed to be a million times higher than the old formula and, if worded properly, not violate the 133-1/3 rule.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use