kgr12 Posted July 23, 2024 Posted July 23, 2024 I think I know the answer to this, but just want to make sure I'm not missing something. Section III.G of Notice 2008-113 states that, in short, an "insider" is a director or officer of the service recipient or owns more than 10% of the service recipient as determined under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Additionally, for purposes of the Notice, it is determined "without regard to whether the service recipient has any class of equity securities registered under § 12 of such Act." Seems pretty straightforward to me that this last provision is meant to cover as insiders those who aren't in publicly traded companies (and therefore making certain corrections under the Notice unavailable due to an insider being involved). I'm working with a nongovernmental tax exempt entity on a failure to make a timely payment under a 457(f) plan in 2023 to a C-Suite executive. The executive is an officer and therefore certainly looks like an insider even though the entity could not under any circumstances have registered securities, and in fact has no ownership at all. Any way to get around the idea that this executive is an insider for purposes of Notice 2008-113?
XTitan Posted July 23, 2024 Posted July 23, 2024 Probably not. - There are two types of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data sets...
Peter Gulia Posted July 23, 2024 Posted July 23, 2024 The Notice points to a rule about the meaning of “officer”. 17 C.F.R. § 240.16a-1(f) https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-17/part-240/section-240.16a-1#p-240.16a-1(f). Peter Gulia PC Fiduciary Guidance Counsel Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 215-732-1552 Peter@FiduciaryGuidanceCounsel.com
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now