Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi. We are acquiring multiple companies. They each have their own H&W benefits. If the employees of the target companies don't join our health plan immediately (but stay on their own health plans), how long can that transition period last? How does that impact nondiscrimination testing? In other words, does the length of the transition period matter when it comes to how the testing is performed?

Thanks for any thoughts.

Posted

Unlike retirement plans, there is no transition period for health and welfare plan nondiscrimination testing purposes.  It poses some difficulties in M&A deals.  There are work-arounds, which are generally only partially satisfactory.  Speak with your benefits counsel.

Posted
Just now, Chaz said:

Unlike retirement plans, there is no transition period for health and welfare plan nondiscrimination testing purposes.  It poses some difficulties in M&A deals.  There are work-arounds, which are generally only partially satisfactory.  Speak with your benefits counsel.

Hi Chaz. What do you mean when you say there is no transition period? I thought that the testing would be done at the end of the plan year. So if the target plans stay separate for the whole year, each plan would be tested; but if the target employees join our health plan, say in November, then the testing is different. Correct or no?

Posted

The buyer would need to do the testing as soon as possible after closing (doing it before closing is ideal).  Doing it at the end of the year is highly risky.  Having two separate plans for even a portion of the year risks failing the eligibility portion of the tests.

In my experience, this is not a priority for the IRS, but of course that could change.

Posted
21 hours ago, Chaz said:

The buyer would need to do the testing as soon as possible after closing (doing it before closing is ideal).  Doing it at the end of the year is highly risky.  Having two separate plans for even a portion of the year risks failing the eligibility portion of the tests.

In my experience, this is not a priority for the IRS, but of course that could change.

Forgive my questions. I thought that if, the transition to a single plan occurred a few months after the transaction (and passed testing) then that is fine. i.e., there wouldn't be any need to do testing immediately following the transaction when the employees were still on separate plans. Is that true?

Posted

If the seller’s former employees and their beneficiaries are covered by the seller’s health plan after those former employees no longer are the seller’s employees, which person—seller or buyer—pays an employer’s expense, and which gets income tax deductions?

Peter Gulia PC

Fiduciary Guidance Counsel

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

215-732-1552

Peter@FiduciaryGuidanceCounsel.com

  • 3 months later...
Posted

One data point, waid10, is that when the buyer's new employees continue to be covered under the seller's plan (which is common, assuming the seller sold only part of its business and continues to have a plan) you technically create a MEWA, but the DOL Form M-1 instructions say you don't have to report if does not extend beyond the end of the plan year following the plan year of the acquisition.

Luke Bailey

Senior Counsel

Clark Hill PLC

214-651-4572 (O) | LBailey@clarkhill.com

2600 Dallas Parkway Suite 600

Frisco, TX 75034

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use