Felicia Posted October 18, 2000 Posted October 18, 2000 An employer adopted a non-ERISA 403(B) plan which provides solely for salary deferrals. Upon an internal audit it was discovered that the employer was in fact making employer contributions for eligible participants for about 3 years. How does the employer correct this? Can this be corrected under Section 5.02 (1) of Rev. Proc. 99-13 as an Operational Failure? Operational Failure being defined in Section 3.05: (10) Any other failure to satisfy applicable requirements under Section 403(B) that ....results in the loss of section 403(B) status.... and is not a Demographic Failure, an Eligibility Failure or a failure related to the purchase of annuity contracts.... If this can be corrected using Rev. Proc. 99-13, how is this accomplished operationally? by a letter from the employer to remove the contributions? by a letter signed by the employee and the employer (this seems logical since the employee set up the account)
Carol V. Calhoun Posted October 19, 2000 Posted October 19, 2000 I had a conversation on this matter recently with someone at the IRS who was in a position to know (although of course, as usual, he was speaking only for himself, not the IRS). He said that IRS recognizes that amounts cannot be removed from a 403(B) plan the way they can be from, for example, a 401(k) plan. Thus, they are permitting use of the two percent fee described in Section 8.03 of 99-13 to be used instead of having a return of contributions. Hope this helps! Employee benefits legal resource site The opinions of my postings are my own and do not necessarily represent my law firm's position, strategies, or opinions. The contents of my postings are offered for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. A visit to this board or an exchange of information through this board does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should consult directly with an attorney for individual advice regarding your particular situation. I am not your lawyer under any circumstances.
IRC401 Posted October 30, 2000 Posted October 30, 2000 How about the arguement that the employer's approval of the contribution was a de facto plan amendment? The rules re: 403(B) documents are looser than for 401(a) plans.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now