Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Plan provides that participants who separate from service and are rehired within one year will be given credited service from the termination date upon return for benefit calculation purposes. Plan is amended to eliminate the credited service restoration upon rehire (vesting service still applies). Any anti-cutback issues with amendment? Why or why not? Would the answer change if a lump sum payment was made upon termination before rehire occurred?

Posted

There are always potential anti-cutback issues with any plan amendment. The amendment cannot "take away" any benefit, or right to receive it at a particular point in time, that has accrued as of the later of (a) the effective date of the amendment or (B) the date of its adoption.

Most amendments will include some generic provision (or possibly a "preamble") that states the amendment will not reduce any benefit accrued as of the later of (a) or (B). It is possible that your amendment already includes the appropriate language.

I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use