Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

It appears that a while a custodial account arrangement of a 403(B) plan that is subject to ERISA may be exempt from the trust requirments of ERISA by qualifying under section 403(B)(7) of the tax code, the brokerage company that is the custodian must still be bonded under under section 412 of ERISA if company is not a regulated trust company or insurance company. Any arguments to the contrary?

Posted

You are generally correct , but the exemptions are a bit broader. See the regs at 2580.412.Often, the brokerage account can well be held in a trust company or other exempt organization. But these exemptions run only yo funds handled by those organizations. If plan funds are being handled by others (such as a consolidated remitter), even though they eventually end up in an exempt organization, bonding will still be required.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use