QDROphile Posted November 27, 2000 Posted November 27, 2000 It appears that a while a custodial account arrangement of a 403(B) plan that is subject to ERISA may be exempt from the trust requirments of ERISA by qualifying under section 403(B)(7) of the tax code, the brokerage company that is the custodian must still be bonded under under section 412 of ERISA if company is not a regulated trust company or insurance company. Any arguments to the contrary?
Guest RJT Posted November 30, 2000 Posted November 30, 2000 You are generally correct , but the exemptions are a bit broader. See the regs at 2580.412.Often, the brokerage account can well be held in a trust company or other exempt organization. But these exemptions run only yo funds handled by those organizations. If plan funds are being handled by others (such as a consolidated remitter), even though they eventually end up in an exempt organization, bonding will still be required.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now