Guest Posted December 26, 2000 Posted December 26, 2000 A company with a June 30 fiscal year maintains a MPPP with a December 31 plan year. The company wants to raise the contribution to 8% from 6%, effective July 1. In other words, if the amendment is effective July 1, 2000, can a 6% contibution be made on compensation in the first 6 months of the plan year and 8% on compensation in the second six months, effectively 7% for the plan year? The reason is that the increase was budgeted for the company fiscal year beginning July 1, 2000.
Erik Read Posted December 27, 2000 Posted December 27, 2000 Seems odd that you would budget for more than the formula with a Money Purchase Pension Plan - usually only hear of increase's or decreases with Profit Sharing Plans in the budgetting process. I think don't think you can use two allocation formula's in the same year for a MPPP. I've never seen it done. Unless you could get creative with the formula and show something like first 1000 hours at 6% last 1000 hours at 8%... not sure that would fly either. The other issue I would have is with regard to the amendment, does the company plan on amending the formula again in the following years or is this a one time rate increase? __________________ Erik Read, APR CKC
Guest mo again Posted December 27, 2000 Posted December 27, 2000 I'm not sure there's a legal reason why you couldn't change it. Anyone, let me know if you are aware of one. Certainly you can freeze a plan mid-year and have a different allocation rate (0%) afterwards. You may, however, be bounced out of safe harbor design and have to general-test.
Guest PAUL DUGAN Posted December 28, 2000 Posted December 28, 2000 I do not think there is any reason that you can not make this amendment. However I think you would have to test since in many companies the highly compensated get large bonuses at year end. Cross testing may help even in these situations.
Guest Posted December 28, 2000 Posted December 28, 2000 This intended to be a one-time increase. The bonus issue was considered, but this is a non-profit organization and this is not an problem. We intend to rate group test. There a few HCE's due to compensation. Anyone still see any problems?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now