Guest Bruce Johnson Posted January 17, 2001 Posted January 17, 2001 SFAS No. 88 requires accounting for a settlement if a)irrevocable action, b)relieves plan of primary responsibility for a pension benefit obligation, & c)eliminates significant risks related to the obligation and the assets used to effect the settlement. I have a plan that purchased guaranteed life annuities for retired participants. However, the benefit purchased for each individual was approximately one-half of each retiree's total plan benefit. The plan maintains an obligation for each retiree. Based on the description above, I believe this is a settlement. However, SFAS No. 88 Q&A #8 asks a similar question and the answer is no. It gives a specific example (different from my situation) where limited-term life annuities were purchased for participants, and the plan maintained some liability for those participants. Would my situation constitue a settlement? Why or why not?
david rigby Posted January 17, 2001 Posted January 17, 2001 It's not clear to me that your situation is the same as Q&A-8. When you say "partial", do you mean that $X (orY%) of the life annuity is paid by the insurance company TO the participant, or is it paid to the trust? If the insurance company is paying to the trust, then NO settlement has occurred; this would be merely an "investment" of the trust. If the insurance company is paying directly to the retiree, Q&A-8 can be interpreted to define your situation as not a settlement. Still a good question. (I have a hard time understanding why a trust would purchase such insurance contracts.) Other point is the word "significant". See Q&A-18. I also suggest that the determination of significant should be related to the entire PBO of the plan, not merely the PBO of the retirees. Might be that the auditor has an opinion on this Q&A. I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
Guest JAREL Posted January 19, 2001 Posted January 19, 2001 If the retiree is entitled to $100 per month for life and the annuity purchased will pay $50 per month for life, you have a settlement. If the annuity purchased will pay $100 for life (up to 5 years), you do not have a settlement.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now