Guest Dave Burns Posted January 24, 2001 Posted January 24, 2001 In 1983, the Supreme Court's Norris Decision revolutionized the way we calculate actuarially equivalent benefits by requiring the use of unisex or gender-neutral mortality assumptions. My question is whether a plan can provide that actuarial equivalence for benefits accrued prior to the Norris decision would continue to be determined on a sex-distinct basis and amounts accrued after the Norris decision would be based on gender-neutral mortality. Any cites to support an opinion one way or another?
Guest mo again Posted January 24, 2001 Posted January 24, 2001 I don't purport to be an expert in this area, but I think if you substitute "could" for "would", the answer may be yes. I believe the current authority on the matter is still the EEOC Compliance Manual, Vol. II, p. 627-11. This policy guide was issued following Long v. Florida which tested the retroactivity rules. Others may be aware of something that overrides that manual, but I am not. Unfortunately I don't have the manual as a resource any more, but perhaps you do, or have friends. There may be 411(d)(6) issues to consider as well.
Guest Donkey Kong Posted January 29, 2001 Posted January 29, 2001 If you substitute "ifs and buts" with "candy and nuts", we would all have a merry Christmas.
Guest Tom: Posted November 28, 2012 Posted November 28, 2012 The Norris decision does not apply to retirement plan participants who retired before August 1, 1983. Florida v. Long, (1988, S Ct) 487 U.S. 223. Participants retiring after August 1, 1983 generally have a right to receive unisex benefits only to the extent that those benefits are derived from post-Norris contributions. EEOC v. First National Bank, (1990, DC IL) 740 F. Supp. 1338. The courts generally have not applied the Norris decision retroactively due to the Supreme Court's determination in Norris that applying unisex benefit requirements to pre-Norris retirements would undermine the fiscal integrity of many retirement plans and systems. Arizona v. Norris, (1983, S Ct), 463 U.S. 1073. The EEOC appears to acknowledge that the Norris decision generally does not apply retroactively in the Title VII/EPA Issues Chapter of its current compliance manual.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now