Guest EMC Posted January 26, 2001 Posted January 26, 2001 This is a follow up to the thread started last Fall regarding "un-terminating" a DC plan (thread started 10/2/00). BACKGROUND: the plan sponsor of a 401(k) plan has executed board resolutions "terminating" the 401(k) plan as of Date X, vested plan participants 100% as of Date X, amended the plan for legislative changes and received a determination letter, BUT has made NO distributions yet. The plan sponsor would like to "un-terminate" the plan before making distributions and begin allowing deferrals, etc. again I was hoping that someone might have some additional insight, cites, or have had informal or formal comunications with the IRS on whether or not this presents a qualification problem for the plan (assuming the 100% vesting in benefits at "termination" is not going to be changed). What is the risk in "un-terminating" a DC plan for which there are board resolutions authorizing the termination, but where no distributions have been made at all and all participants will remain 100% vested?
david rigby Posted January 26, 2001 Posted January 26, 2001 Here is prior discussion: http://benefitslink.com/boards/index.php?a...=ST&f=19&t=5241 http://benefitslink.com/boards/index.php?a...=ST&f=19&t=3735 http://benefitslink.com/boards/index.php?a...=ST&f=19&t=3725 I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
Richard Anderson Posted January 26, 2001 Posted January 26, 2001 This may be the thread EMC was referring to: http://benefitslink.com/boards/index.php?a...=ST&f=19&t=7343
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now