lkpittman Posted February 12, 2001 Posted February 12, 2001 If a plan is set up to cover only members of the board of directors and directors are NOT HCEs under 414(q) (plan tests out okay under 410(B)) would there be any reason why this classification might be considered unreasonable? LKP
david rigby Posted February 12, 2001 Posted February 12, 2001 Is this a qualified plan? I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
lkpittman Posted February 12, 2001 Author Posted February 12, 2001 Hi Pax--I also posted this message under Cafeteria Plans--it is a 125 plan (the board members are not HCEs under the 125 rules, either), HOWEVER, we are interested in whether this "classification" might be reasonable under the 410(B) rules (410(B) also applies to 125 plans)--i.e., exclusion of employees other than board members. Let's say it's a qualified plan--would you see any problem with it? Feel free to respond under the Caf Plan heading, too. Thanks! LKP
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now