Cathy from Chicago Posted March 2, 2001 Posted March 2, 2001 Can a participant name a trust as his beneficiary? If not, why? If so, why isn't it done more frequently? thank you.
Guest Steve C. Posted March 5, 2001 Posted March 5, 2001 Yes. The requirements for naming a trust as the designated beneficiary are found at Regs. 1.409(a)(9)-4 Q&A's 5 and 6. Naming a trust as a designated beneficiary of qualified plan or IRA benefits is done frequently by estate planners.
Cathy from Chicago Posted March 5, 2001 Author Posted March 5, 2001 Thanks, Steve, for your prompt answer!
Guest PAUL DUGAN Posted March 8, 2001 Posted March 8, 2001 I agree with Steve that it is legal and that estate planners do suggest this in a number of cases. However because of the income taxes, it can create many problems with a married participant. One of my plans was involved in a real nasty law suit when the insurance agent took a death bed benificiary change from spouse to trust. The change was to save possible future estate taxes but resulted in 350,000 of income taxes now.
Mary Kay Foss Posted March 8, 2001 Posted March 8, 2001 A trust is often a better beneficiary for an IRA than a qualified plan. Most qualified plans with a nonspouse beneficiary pay out the benefits in a lump sum all in one or two years. This causes the income tax problem referred to above. If the benefits are rolled into an IRA, a trust beneficiary can manage the income taxes. This is because a qualified trust beneficiary can take distributions over the life expectancy of the oldest trust beneficiary. Mary Kay Foss CPA
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now