Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

A large employer (closely held by father and 3 kids) has 7 leased employees (no coverage issues, this is purely an allocation eligibility issue); the Plan excludes leased employees.  But as it turns out, the leasing employer is in a controlled group with the recipient employer, as the father, and a family trust comprised of the spouse and three kids, are also the owners of the leasing employer.  As such, are these 7 employees still able to be excluded due to the leased employee classification; or should they be benefitting participants because the controlled group means they are just treated as employees of the sponsoring employer?

Posted

If they are members of controlled group they would simply be employees for coverage testing. Whether or not they are eligible would be determined by the Plan Document. Has that Controlled Employer adopted the Plan?

Posted

Agree with Lou, you cannot statutorily exclude from coverage and nondiscrimination testing but whether they must be covered/benefit depends on the terms of the plan with respect to their employer, which you said did not adopt and is not automatically covered.

Kenneth M. Prell, CEBS, ERPA

Vice President, BPAS Actuarial & Pension Services

kprell@bpas.com

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use