tsrl01 Posted October 12, 2022 Posted October 12, 2022 We submitted our plan to the IRS under VCP about 6 months ago and just found an issue completely unrelated to the VCP submission. I do not see any requirements that we can't still self correct the recently identified problem, but wanted to see if anybody had a different opinion. In my mind, since there isn't a specific exclusion, as long as the issue would otherwise qualify for self correction, I can. Any insight would be appreciate - because maybe I completely missed an all cap requirement that says differently....
Nate S Posted October 12, 2022 Posted October 12, 2022 If found concurrently under audit, then unrelated issues would be treated at the same time under CAP. VCP and SCP are almost always handled independently, although a series of failures can become a single issue dependent upon circumstances and significance. You can also seek a PLR if the significance is in question and you cannot draw a clear distinction under SCP. Luke Bailey 1
rocknrolls2 Posted October 13, 2022 Posted October 13, 2022 According to the most recent EPCRS Rev Proc, even if the plan is under Audit CAP, it is possible to self-correct. In many cases, the agent handling the Audit CAP will specifically allow you to use SCP for the self-correctable items. I see no reason why you could not self-correct merely because you submitted a VCP application. I assume that you have not yet heard from the agent assigned to review the VCP application. In that case, go full speed ahead. Luke Bailey 1
Luke Bailey Posted October 21, 2022 Posted October 21, 2022 On 10/12/2022 at 1:17 PM, tsrl01 said: We submitted our plan to the IRS under VCP about 6 months ago and just found an issue completely unrelated to the VCP submission. I do not see any requirements that we can't still self correct the recently identified problem, but wanted to see if anybody had a different opinion. In my mind, since there isn't a specific exclusion, as long as the issue would otherwise qualify for self correction, I can. Any insight would be appreciate - because maybe I completely missed an all cap requirement that says differently.... I don't think you missed anything, tsrl01. Luke Bailey Senior Counsel Clark Hill PLC 214-651-4572 (O) | LBailey@clarkhill.com 2600 Dallas Parkway Suite 600 Frisco, TX 75034
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now