Jakyasar Posted January 29, 2024 Posted January 29, 2024 Hi Checking a Combo plan CB/DC and came across the following: CB definition of compensation is W-2 and includes all DC definition of compensation is W-2 and includes all (section 125 as well - not deemed) But Under a separate addendum, DC excludes deemed 125 compensation in Compensation and 415 Compensation (language from the document). So when I check for compensation in DC for allocating PS, Gateway, Top heavy and also for testing, how does the "deemed 125 compensation" language kick in. So confused.
Bri Posted January 29, 2024 Posted January 29, 2024 First thing - does your plan sponsor actually pay those types of wages such that you "need" to account for it? If so, then you then will have to decide (if the plan doesn't do that for you) how 414s comp will be defined for your testing. Sounds like it may not be allocation-eligible compensation, but could still need to be part of your testing compensation. CuseFan 1
CuseFan Posted January 29, 2024 Posted January 29, 2024 45 minutes ago, Bri said: does your plan sponsor actually pay those types of wages Exactly, that sort of issue occurs very infrequently in my experience. Kenneth M. Prell, CEBS, ERPA Vice President, BPAS Actuarial & Pension Services kprell@bpas.com
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now