J Simmons Posted February 5, 2024 Posted February 5, 2024 Small employer group health policies have, since ACA, been allowed to impose no more than a 90-day waiting period on new employees before they must be offered coverage. 42 U.S.C. 300gg-7. Can a small employer offer coverage in that time frame to a new employee, but it would require the employee to pay all of the premium expense until say 1 or 2 years of employment have passed? John Simmons johnsimmonslaw@gmail.com Note to Readers: For you, I'm a stranger posting on a bulletin board. Posts here should not be given the same weight as personalized advice from a professional who knows or can learn all the facts of your situation.
Brian Gilmore Posted February 5, 2024 Posted February 5, 2024 In theory that would be allowed. But keep in mind that a) the carrier probably has minimum employer contribution requirements, b) if this is an ALE, they would be exposing the company to "B Penalty" liability because the offer would be unaffordable for most, and c) the Section 125 uniform election rule may present an issue from an NDT perspective (overview here: https://www.newfront.com/blog/designing-health-plans-with-different-strategies). Also note that you can have a substantive eligibility condition of up to one month (referred to as a "bona fide orientation period") before application of the 90-day waiting period. You just have to be careful to coordinate that with the employer mandate limited non-assessment period rules if it's an ALE. More discussion here: https://www.newfront.com/blog/aca-first-day-of-the-fourth-full-calendar-month-rule acm_acm and Bill Presson 2
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now