Audrey Posted July 2, 2024 Posted July 2, 2024 if a plan has been frozen from 1/1/2024 (both accrual and participation are frozen), a participant met all eligibility requirements and should enter the plan on 1/1/2024 if the plan is not frozen. we don't need to test 401a26 test due to SECURE act 401a26 relief; there is no accrual so no 410(b) test. but I'm just curious - in this case, should he/she be included in non-discrimination testing due to meeting all eligibility requirements? or he/she should not be included in tests due to 1/1/2024 freeze date? thanks!
CuseFan Posted July 2, 2024 Posted July 2, 2024 401(a)(26) is good assuming prior structure was compliant. If no one benefits in 2024 then no 410(b) or 401(a)(4) concerns. If the plan was "soft" frozen (just participation) then you would need to include this person in your testing population as (s)he would not be a statutory exclusion. SSRRS, Luke Bailey, Bri and 1 other 4 Kenneth M. Prell, CEBS, ERPA Vice President, BPAS Actuarial & Pension Services kprell@bpas.com
Audrey Posted July 2, 2024 Author Posted July 2, 2024 54 minutes ago, CuseFan said: 401(a)(26) is good assuming prior structure was compliant. If no one benefits in 2024 then no 410(b) or 401(a)(4) concerns. If the plan was "soft" frozen (just participation) then you would need to include this person in your testing population as (s)he would not be a statutory exclusion. Thank you Kenneth!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now