Jaded Posted July 22, 2024 Posted July 22, 2024 My client, a federal contractor, received a demand letter for pension withdrawal liability when their 7-year federal contract expired. The entity that won the new contract continued employing the exact same people doing the exact same job, making the exact same pension contributions. If this were a sales transaction, the successor liability question would be clear, but this wasn't a sale. This was a contact ending and being picked up by the next employing entity. I would argue there hasn't been a withdrawal at all since these same employees continue to participate in the pension plan, just under a new employer's EIN. Is my client seriously on the hook for this charge that will probably bankrupt them? 35 years in this industry and the crazy stuff people come up with still surprises me
Peter Gulia Posted July 22, 2024 Posted July 22, 2024 That an employer’s obligation to contribute to a multiemployer pension plan ends in circumstances not of the employer’s choosing is not by itself an excuse from withdrawal liability. Your client needs to lawyer-up, yesterday. CuseFan, acm_acm and Bill Presson 3 Peter Gulia PC Fiduciary Guidance Counsel Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 215-732-1552 Peter@FiduciaryGuidanceCounsel.com
Madison71 Posted July 25, 2024 Posted July 25, 2024 Is it for partial withdrawal liability or a complete withdrawal? Employer can absolutely negotiate a lower amount and they will postpone enforcement pending review (although I recall the liability continues to accrue interest during the review). They will request all financial records in determination of what the employer can afford....it is not easy to reduce the amount owed, but it can happen. Let the negotiations begin. Luke Bailey 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now