Jakyasar Posted Wednesday at 06:21 PM Posted Wednesday at 06:21 PM Having a brain freeze for a change. Checking a CB plan. No exclusions, all are included. The 2 owners (50/50), are defined by name in their own groups i.e. group 1 - Joe Smith and group 2 - Moe Smith. All others who are rank&file are in group 3. Does each rate group need to pass ratio test or mid-point test is fine here? How about if each group for the owners is written as: Group 1: Shareholder of company - Joe smith Group 2: Shareholder of company - Moe Smith Thanks QKA, QKC, QPA, CBS - I used to be indecisive about pensions but now I am not so sure
Jakyasar Posted 15 hours ago Author Posted 15 hours ago Any takers? QKA, QKC, QPA, CBS - I used to be indecisive about pensions but now I am not so sure
CuseFan Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago No exclusions, so you pass coverage 410(b) on ratio percentage. Need to pass 401(a)(4) nondiscrimination testing your rate groups. Rate groups for that purpose are based on your NARs and MVARs, not how they are defined in the plan for allocations. Each rate group on that basis must satisfy coverage, could be ratio percentage or could be average benefits. If you need average benefits for this, then yes, you need to hit the SH/USH midpoint. David D 1 Kenneth M. Prell, CEBS, ERPA Vice President, BPAS Actuarial & Pension Services kprell@bpas.com
Jakyasar Posted 13 hours ago Author Posted 13 hours ago Thanks, that was my understanding as well, passing the midpoint test i/o ratio test for each rate group (this is for 401a4 only as no issue with 410b). it is the using individual's names for each group I had a brain freeze with. QKA, QKC, QPA, CBS - I used to be indecisive about pensions but now I am not so sure
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now