Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Having a brain freeze for a change.

Checking a CB plan. No exclusions, all are included.

The 2 owners (50/50), are defined by name in their own groups i.e. group 1 - Joe Smith and group 2 - Moe Smith.

All others who are rank&file are in group 3.

Does each rate group need to pass ratio test or mid-point test is fine here?

How about if each group for the owners is written as:

Group 1: Shareholder of company - Joe smith

Group 2: Shareholder of company - Moe Smith

Thanks

QKA, QKC, QPA, CBS - I used to be indecisive about pensions but now I am not so sure

Posted

Any takers?

QKA, QKC, QPA, CBS - I used to be indecisive about pensions but now I am not so sure

Posted

No exclusions, so you pass coverage 410(b) on ratio percentage.

Need to pass 401(a)(4) nondiscrimination testing your rate groups. Rate groups for that purpose are based on your NARs and MVARs, not how they are defined in the plan for allocations. Each rate group on that basis must satisfy coverage, could be ratio percentage or could be average benefits. If you need average benefits for this, then yes, you need to hit the SH/USH midpoint.

Kenneth M. Prell, CEBS, ERPA

Vice President, BPAS Actuarial & Pension Services

kprell@bpas.com

Posted

Thanks, that was my understanding as well, passing the midpoint test i/o ratio test for each rate group (this is for 401a4 only as no issue with 410b). it is the using individual's names for each group I had a brain freeze with.

QKA, QKC, QPA, CBS - I used to be indecisive about pensions but now I am not so sure

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...