Julie Posted January 23, 2019 Posted January 23, 2019 Is adjunct professionals a reasonable exclusion from Code 410(a)??
david rigby Posted January 23, 2019 Posted January 23, 2019 Pardon my ignorance, can you provide more information? I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
Luke Bailey Posted January 23, 2019 Posted January 23, 2019 I think you mean 410(b). 410(a) is the "no cost" exclusions, i.e. union if plan was subject of bargaining, NRA's with no U.S. source income, etc. I think what you are asking is whether "adjunct professionals" would be excludable, even if not listed in 410(a), if without them your plan still meets 410(b). Generally, the answer is yes, provided that this is a bona fide employee distinction established in your employee handbook, etc., and employees know when they are classified as one or the other, so check the HR infrastructure you have for the classification. It can't just be words you stick in the plan document and then the plan administrator arbitrarily decides who is one. Luke Bailey Senior Counsel Clark Hill PLC 214-651-4572 (O) | LBailey@clarkhill.com 2600 Dallas Parkway Suite 600 Frisco, TX 75034
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now