|
|
|
|
BenefitsLink
Message Boards Digest
May 21, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here are the most recently added topics on the BenefitsLink Message Boards:
|
|
Santo Gold created a topic in Retirement Plans in General
Doctor who was 100% owner of his practice sells the practice to a new owner (not related to the original owner), who has become the sole 100% owner. The old owner continues to work as an employee in the practice. The 401k plan was top heavy before the sale. The sale took place in 2018 (it's now 2019). [1] Since the date of the sale, for the 2019 plan year, is the account balance of the prior owner excluded for top heavy calculations? [2] If so, does that continue for.... how many years? Forever? Also, the adult son of the prior owner is a plan participant and continues to work after the sale. He was a key meployee by attribution before the sale. [3] Starting in 2019, is he a key employee, non-key, or excluded from the top heavy calculation?
|
|
[Advert.]
Utilize ASC's sophisticated scripting language to perform tests and tasks on multiple plans without any user action. Take advantage of our interactive & high volume "batch" functionality to achieve higher efficiency. Contact us at sales@asc-net.com.
|
|
Barbara created a topic in 401(k) Plans
I have a non=safe harbor 401k plan that's been in effect for 10 years. Initially, the employer adopted an "owner-only" plan that had no eligibility service or hours requirements, but he also owned another company, that (surprise!) had employees. Although none of those employees ever worked 1,000 hours in a plan year, they were never specifically excluded under the terms of the original plan document. There are no matching contributions. The employer deposited a 25% profit sharing contribution each year into his and his wife's accounts. The profit sharing allocation method is divided pro rata under the terms of the document. There are no allocation conditions (of course). We had planned to submit under EPCRS, because the violations don't meet the requirements for self-correction. Question: Assuming the ADP of the two HCE owners is 30%, I assume the correction for the "missed deferral
opportunity' is 50% of an ADP for NHCEs that will pass the ADP test. That is, do I take 50% of 30% divided by 1.2 to arrive at a correction percent of 12.5%? This seems like an awfully burdensome correction, especially because I need to give everyone a 25%-of-pay profit sharing contribution! Has anyone tried to use a lower percentage for correction purposes?
|
|
Jeff Kirtner created a topic in 403(b) Plans, Accounts or Annuities
A non-ERISA 403(b) plan was amended to include an automatic contribution arrangement. Does that amendment make the plan subject to ERISA? If so, if the plan is amended to terminate the ACA, does the plan again become a non-ERISA plan?
|
|
Gilmore created a topic in Form 5500
A small, calendar year cash balance plan purchases life insurance in November 2018. The insurance company says a Schedule A will not be completed until November 2019. Assuming the 2018 commissions will be listed on the Nov 2019 Schedule A, is it acceptable to wait until the 2019 5500 to enter 2018 commission amounts on Line 10e Part V of the SF? Or do we press the insurance company to provide the commission amount paid in 2018?
|
|
|
|
|
BenefitsLink.com, Inc.
1298 Minnesota Avenue, Suite H
Winter Park, Florida 32789
(407) 644-4146
|
|
|
Lois Baker, J.D., President
David Rhett Baker, J.D., Editor and Publisher
Holly Horton, Business Manager
Copyright 2019 BenefitsLink.com, Inc. All materials contained in this mailing are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of BenefitsLink.com, Inc., or in the case of third party materials, the owner of those materials. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notices from copies of the content.
Links to web sites other than BenefitsLink.com and EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com are offered as a service to our readers; we were not involved in their production and are not responsible for their content.
|
|
|
Unsubscribe |
Privacy Policy
|
|
|
|
|