 |
 |
 |
|
BenefitsLink® Message Boards Digest
November 29, 2023
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Here are the most recently added topics on the BenefitsLink® Message Boards
|
|
Santo Gold created a topic in Retirement Plans in General
"A sole prop established a solo 401k plan in 2023, wants to include after-tax employee contributions and do the mega-backdoor Roth with it. [1] do the after-tax contributions have to be deposited by 12/31/2023? [2] Does the Roth conversion have to be done by 12/31/2023 as well in order to be applied towards the 2023 tax year?"
|
|
[Sponsored]
FTW & RTO Benefits join forces for compliance documents, advanced testing, and unrivaled efficiency. Together we’re redefining Health & welfare compliance. Learn More!
|
|
Belgarath created a topic in 401(k) Plans
"Starting to work my way through this. Welcome news that certain class exclusions can apply. But, they cannot be a proxy for for an age or service requirement. Consider the following: plan currently excludes interns. ALL interns work between 500 and 999 hours. My reading is that this exclusion would not be valid, and LTPT rights would need to be granted to interns that otherwise satisfy the LTPT age/service requirements.
Agree/disagree? Now, if interns work various numbers of hours - some 500-999, some over 1,000, and interns are an excluded class, then it should be permissible to exclude them from LTPT requirements. Agree/disagree?"
|
|
BG5150 created a topic in Retirement Plans in General
"Plan has a few participants whose religion precludes them from investing in any of the plan's alternatives. There are several hundred active participants. What duty, if any, do the fiduciaries/trustees have to include a fund/funds that would be eligible under a haram/halal investing strategy? It is quite a niche corner of the investing world (at least here in the US), and funds can go from performing to underperforming quite
rapidly quarter over quarter. Would the these participants have some sort of religious discrimination claim if these types of investments are not offered? Just on a fact-finding mission for now. I sent the plan sponsor to their attorney, but I'd like to get the community's take on this."
|
|
R. Butler created a topic in 401(k) Plans
"Plan has different eligibility requirements for deferrals and safe harbor match. If a participant is eligible for deferrals, but not the safe harbor portion, must that participant receive a safe harbor notice? Generally the notice requirement is satisfied if notice is given to each employee eligible to participate, but I can't determine if that means eligible for safe harbor or for the plan in general."
|
|
AlbanyConsultant created a topic in 401(k) Plans
"My understanding is that for a plan started before SECURE 2.0 (and therefore grandfathered in for not being required to have automatic enrollment if over 10 employees), if they add an automatic enrollment provision voluntarily, then LTPTEs are not subject to the automatic enrollment. I don't see anything in the proposed regs that counters this. Am I correct with this?"
|
Here are the most recently posted jobs on EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com,® a service of BenefitsLink®
|
|
|
 |
 |
BenefitsLink.com, Inc.
(407) 644-4146
|
 |
 |
Lois Baker, J.D., President
David Rhett Baker, J.D., Editor and Publisher
Copyright 2023 BenefitsLink.com, Inc. All materials contained in this mailing are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of BenefitsLink.com, Inc., or in the case of third party materials, the owner of those materials. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notices from copies of the content.
Links to web sites other than BenefitsLink.com and EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com are offered as a service to our readers. We were not involved in the production of such links and are not responsible for their content.
|
 |
 |
Unsubscribe |
Privacy Policy
|
 |
 |
|
 |