April 10, 2001 Today's sponsor: HRnext.com (click) HR Challenge 2 is here ... Are you ready? Reaction to HRnext's first HR Challenge was so positive, we did it again! Test your HR mettle with 25 new and challenging questions. Once again you get instant feedback of your results. New feature: along with the answers you get a link to detailed explanations at HRnext.. Get a Free Report too! PWBA Settles Lawsuit Against Plan and Sponsor for Failing to Bond the Plan Excerpt: "[T]his suit against a very small plan regarding a modest bonding requirement illustrates that there are no 'de minimis' exceptions for fiduciary duties and the protection of plan assets." (EBIA Weekly) A New GUST of Retirement Plan and Distributions Changes: Time for Plan Redesign? Excerpt: "A new wind is blowing around retirement plan design issues ... While many plans might be able to satisfy these new rules with relatively minimal changes, the plan documents and the possible amendments will need careful analysis from a retirement policy, employee retention, and cost goals perspective." (Deloitte & Touche) DOL "Clarifies" Guidance on Using Plan Assets to Pay Plan-Related Expenses Excerpt: "Permissible expense payments by ERISA plans may be less narrow than the Department of Labor (DOL) has indicated in the past, based on a recent advisory opinion (2001-01A) updating guidance from the DOL's Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration (PWBA). The guidance represented a somewhat surprising turnaround from earlier advisory opinions and from recent enforcement actions and statements from that agency." (Deloitte & Touche) Contractor Liabilities - Participating in the Multiemployer Pension Plan Excerpt: "The concept of withdrawal liability is relatively simple. If an employer withdraws from participation in a multiemployer pension plan, and if at the time of the withdrawal that pension plan is underfunded, then the employer must pay its share of that underfunding to the plan in the form of a withdrawal liability payment." (William K. Ecklund, Esq. of Felhaber, Larson, Fenlon and Vogt, P.A.) Funds of Funds: Putting the Portfolio on Auto-Pilot Excerpt: "Autopilot-type funds typically fall into one of four categories: index funds that simply copy major market indexes; asset-allocation or 'lifestyle' funds, some of which automatically change their investment mix as you age; 'funds of funds' that mix mutual funds for you in a single fund portfolio; and balanced funds that always maintain some mix of stocks and bonds." (Los Angeles Times) After the Dust Has Settled: a 401(k) Makeover Excerpt: "It's the first time many Americans have confronted month after month of losses in their retirement plans, and they're wondering what to do now, financial experts say." (Los Angeles Times) Prudential Wants to Go Public Excerpt: "Prudential Insurance Co. of America, the nation's largest life insurer, on Monday filed plans showing it intends to raise up to nearly $3.9 billion by becoming a publicly traded company." (Associated Press, via Excite News) Ninth Circuit Offers "Safe Harbor" Language to Grant Discretion to Plan Administrator Ingram v. Martin Marietta Long Term Disability Income Plan for Salaried Employees of Transferred GE Operations (9th Cir. 2001). Excerpt: "With this opinion, the Ninth Circuit joins the Seventh Circuit in offering 'safe harbor' language which, if included in an ERISA plan, will be sufficient to trigger the deferential arbitrary and capricious standard of review." (EBIA Weekly) Benefits in Brief: March 2001 Issue (PDF) Articles include: IRS Proposes New Minimum Distribution Rules; Department of Labor Issues Guidance on Plan Expenses; Supreme Court's Decision Not to Hear Erie Case; Failure to Provide Notice of Reduced Future Retirement Benefits in Summary Plan Description Violated ERISA's Disclosure Requirements; Notice of Domestic Relations Order Immediately Before Participant's Death Was Sufficient to Enforce Post-Death QDRO; IRS Enhances Plan Correction Programs; IRS Issues Final COBRA Regulations; more. (Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP) Simply Asking Is Found to be Substantial Compliance with Plan's Beneficiary Change Rules Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada v. Richardson (E.D. La. 2001). Excerpt: "This is an unusual case in that the court found substantial compliance even though the participant merely asked for the forms. The result in this case is based upon the very specific facts of the participant's situation. Other courts have found that merely asking for a change in beneficiary form is not enough to change a life insurance beneficiary." (EBIA Weekly) Newly Posted or Renewed Job Openings (Post Yours!)
Newly Posted Conferences (Post Yours!)
Subscribe to the Welfare Plans Edition, too (click) Copyright 2001 BenefitsLink.com, Inc. You may freely distribute this email newsletter in whole. Click here to learn how your company can sponsor a future issue! BenefitsLink is a trademark of BenefitsLink.com, Inc., published by Dave Baker with much help from Mary Hall and lots of friends. To subscribe (free): visit https://benefitslink.com/newsletter - or the person desiring to subscribe can send an email to BLretirement@add.mb00.net To unsubscribe: visit https://benefitslink.com/newsletter - or you can send an email to BLretirement@remove.mb00.net We have an online archive of prior issues at https://benefitslink.com/newsletters/ |