[Official Guidance]
Text of SEC Proposed Rule: Updated Disclosure Requirements and Summary Prospectus for Variable Annuity and Variable Life Insurance Contracts (PDF)
480 pages. "The [SEC] is proposing rule and form amendments that are intended to help investors make informed investment decisions regarding variable annuity and variable life insurance contracts. The proposal would modernize disclosures by using a layered disclosure approach designed to provide investors with key information relating to the contract's terms, benefits, and risks in a concise and more reader-friendly presentation, with access to more detailed information available online and electronically or in paper format on request.... In addition, we are proposing amendments to the registration forms for variable annuity and variable life insurance contracts to update and enhance the disclosures to investors in these contracts, and to implement the proposed summary prospectus framework.... Lastly, we are seeking comments regarding parallel amendments to rules governing mutual fund
summary prospectuses and registration forms applicable to other types of registered investment companies."
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission [SEC]
|
[Guidance Overview]
SEC Fact Sheet: Proposed Disclosure Improvements for Variable Annuities and Variable Life Insurance Contracts
"The proposed rule would permit a person to satisfy its prospectus delivery obligations under the Securities Act for a variable contract by sending or giving a summary prospectus to investors and making the statutory prospectus available online. The proposal leverages both technology and a layered disclosure approach to improve the ability of investors to understand and evaluate variable contracts.... [1] New option to use a summary prospectus for variable contracts ... [2] Availability of variable contract statutory prospectus and other materials ... [3] Optional method to satisfy prospectus delivery requirements for underlying mutual funds ... [4] Updates to variable contract registration forms."
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission [SEC]
|
Issues with 401(k) Plan Notices: Be Aware (or Beware)
"[T]he employer and the other plan fiduciaries ... must ensure that the notices contain the required information, and that they are appropriately delivered.... Consideration should be given to striking the right balance in terms of combining notices.... ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code permit electronic delivery; however, ... [t]here are specific regulatory conditions that must be satisfied. Many service providers deliver notices on behalf of plan sponsors, but do not fulfill the necessary conditions."
Hawley Troxell
|
|
|
Are ERISA Claims Subject to Arbitration?
"[P]lan sponsors should consider the unique characteristics of ERISA litigation when considering whether to adopt and/or seek to enforce arbitration provisions.... [W]hile class action litigation can be burdensome, it has the advantage of ensuring finality. Even if an employer can compel an individual employee to arbitrate disputes, the employer may end up playing 'whack a mole' as additional employee lawsuits spring up relating to the same legal issues, requiring repeated arbitration of the same basic claims, with potentially inconsistent results."
Trucker Huss
|
Open MEP Opportunities and Compliance Challenges (PDF)
"Assuming the DOL or Congress takes appropriate action, advisers may be in a position to offer small businesses an efficient, cost-effective solution to providing retirement benefits to their employees. In turn, advisers will likely be required to assume some liability under [ERISA] and act in accordance with its fiduciary and prohibited transaction provisions." [The author also notes that, "On the date this article was published, the [DOL] proposed a regulation intended to broaden the availability of MEPs. In so doing, the Department addressed some of the challenges raised in this article, but not all."]
Groom Law Group, via planadviser
|
DOL's Proposal for Multiple-Employer Plans Is Limited
"Last week, the [DOL] proposed expanding multiple-employer plans ... The proposal isn't comprehensive enough to create sweeping changes. But, it may induce a few more entities to offer MEPs, possibly increasing retirement coverage and perhaps improving the quality of the retirement plans for some small businesses.... In the meantime, many Congress watchers think lawmakers could pass a broader bill in the lame-duck session that would make multiple-employer plans more widely available."
Morningstar Advisor
|
Best Interest and Best Practices, Part 7
"[It] appears that Reg BI and the RIA Interpretation are moving along towards completion. That probably means that the final rules will be completed near the end of the first quarter or early in the second quarter of 2019.... [T]he DOL's guidance will probably be, to a large degree, based on the SEC's final rules. As a result, their guidance will follow the SEC's, rather than being released at the same time."
FredReish.com
|
Judge Conditionally Approves Proposed Settlement to Resolve St. Joseph Health Lawsuits
"Provisions in the proposed settlement include an immediate lump-sum payment of at least $11.15 million and admission by the settling defendants that the plaintiffs' damages are at least $125 million. This proposed settlement could resolve lawsuits filed in June alleging that St. Joseph's Health Services stopped making necessary contributions to the retirement plan, resulting in it being grossly underfunded."
Pensions & Investments
|
Creating Retirement Paychecks from a Volatile Portfolio
"[T]he mechanical challenge of how to actually generate those retirement 'paychecks' that transitioning retirees are accustomed to, is an entirely separate matter from just investing the retirement portfolio itself, and entails a number of distinct policy-based decisions about how to standardize a process for a wide range of retirees.... [A]dvisors might even consider creating Withdrawal Policy Statements to then codify the processes they will use to generate retirement income withdrawals[.]"
Nerd's Eye View
|
Would Greater Awareness of Social Security Survivor Benefits Affect Claiming Decisions?
"A simple information intervention that highlights the likelihood and consequences of widowhood, and demonstrates how delayed claiming enhances survivor benefits, may be insufficient to change the stated claiming intentions of older husbands. The framing of these information interventions ... seems to affect claiming at least as much as the content presented."
Center for Retirement Research at Boston College
|
|
|
|
Benefits in General
|
Benefits Administrators: Time to Provide End-of-Year Notices
"With open enrollment approaching for many employers, ... [this article provides] a list of the various notices and disclosures generally required to be provided to participants around this time of year." [Covers notices and disclosures for both retirement plans and health & welfare plans.]
Vorys
|
|
Executive Compensation and Nonqualified Plans
|
|
|
|
Selected Discussions on the BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
Is It Discriminatory to Charge Higher Distribution Fee for Smaller Accounts?
The standard distribution fee from the plan is $75. If a participant is "forced out," however, the fee is $125. The force-outs are always the amounts that are less than $1,000. The original theory behind the additional fee was that there is additional work involved in setting up the rollover IRA. For amounts, however, that are not rolled to an IRA, I am concerned that this fee could be looked at as discriminatory because it's essentially only going to be applied to NHCEs.
BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
RMD Start Date Question: 70-1/2 in 2017, But No Vesting Until 2018
New owner-only plan effective 1/1/2017. Owner reaches age 70‑1/2 in 2017. Vesting is 6-year graded. Vesting prior to effective date of plan is excluded. As of 12/31/2018, the owner would be 20% vested. When would the first RMD need to be distributed?
BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most Popular Items in the Previous Issue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|