|
|
Hardship Distributions and Headaches Down the Road
"Most plans do use the safe harbor guidelines for what qualifies as an immediate and heavy financial need. But plan administrators need to understand that the use of such safe harbors may require them to treat hardship differently than they would if the plan did not use the safe harbors."
Employee Benefits Law Group
|
Rehabilitation for Multiemployer Pension Funds Act of 2019 and Its Potential Impact
"[HR 397, also known as the 'Butch Lewis Act',] does not seem to provide for future eligibility if a plan is not eligible at the time of enactment.... [S]ome plans that would benefit from provisions to help them get out of a stagnant situation may be ineligible because of plan demographics. Some plans may find it advantageous to significantly shift their mortality, investment return, or industry level assumption in order to be in critical and declining status to be eligible for the loan program."
Cowden Associates, Inc.
|
Companies Are Racing to Dump Their Pension Plans
"Deal volume in the 'pension risk transfer' business ... was the biggest ever in 2018, and is on track to be bigger still this year.... Among Fortune 500 companies, only 81 sponsored a pension plan in 2017, down from 288 in 1998 ... At the same time, the number of pension risk transfer deals rose to 493 in 2018 from 203 in 2012[.]"
Axios
|
Disability and Death Probability Tables for Insured Workers Born in 1999 (PDF)
"The projected probabilities of death before NRA have decreased between the 1966 and 1999 birth cohorts, reflecting in part the actual improvement in mortality experience between 1986 and 2019. The projected probability of becoming disabled before NRA has decreased for insured men between the 1966 and 1999 birth cohorts, but has increased for insured women. For the 1999 birth cohort, we project that the probability of surviving from age 20 to NRA without ever being disabled is 65 percent for males and 69 percent for females. Comparable probabilities projected for the 1966 birth cohort are 58 percent for males and 70 percent for females."
Office of the Chief Actuary, U.S. Social Security Administration [SSA]
|
|
|
|
Benefits in General
|
Benefits That Engaged Employees Want and Need
"[1] Employees want their employers to do more to support their financial health; [2] Access to quality behavioral health services at convenient locations correlates with employee wellbeing; and [3] Employees would like more opportunities for paid time off to volunteer in the community."
Grooms Benefit Solutions
|
|
Selected Discussions on the BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
Must Allow Multiple Trustee/Custodians Under a SIMPLE Plan?
A small business has a SIMPLE, and all participants have signed on to have their SIMPLE accounts through one financial firm (let's say Merrill Lynch). Now one participant brings in paperwork that says he wants to open his SIMPLE account somewhere else instead. Does the plan sponsor have the authority to limit where the accounts are? From what I can see, I don't think so, unless maybe the SIMPLE document is specifically a SIMPLE document from ML that specifies that all accounts will be held there... and even then, I'm not sure that would hold up.
BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
HCEs Voluntarily Take a Reduced ESOP Allocation
A company is owned 100% by an ESOP. The only contributions are made by the company. The company executives voluntarily decide they want to reduce the executives' compensation contribution percentage to a much lower percentage than is being contributed for other employees. Am I correct in assuming that to do so without a plan amendment to that effect creates a plan failure that needs to be corrected?
BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most Popular Items in the Previous Issue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|