[Official Guidance]
Text of IRS PMTA-2019-12: Whether Section 7521 Applies to the Employee Plans and Exempt Organization Determination Process (PDF)
"[Code] section 7521 ... requires [IRS] employees in select circumstances to permit audio recording and provide taxpayers certain explanations of IRS procedures ... It is our conclusion that section 7521 does not apply to discussions pertaining to the EP and EO determination process because 7521 only applies to in-person interviews with a taxpayer relating to the determination or collection of any tax, and the EP and EO determination process is not related to the determination or collection of any tax. Any determination or collection of any tax would take place in a separate proceeding depending on the outcome of the EO and EP determination process." [Program Manager Technical Advice dated Oct. 18, 2019; published Dec. 16, 2019]
Internal Revenue Service [IRS]
|
|
|
Rev. Proc. 2020-9 Addresses Interim Amendments for Pre-Approved Plans That Allow Hardship Distributions
"Amendments relating to hardship distribution provisions that are effective on or before January 1, 2020, are integral to the amendments required to comply with the final hardship regulation provisions concerning suspensions of contributions and representations of financial need. The deadline for adopting the interim amendments required as a result of the final regulations on hardship distributions is extended to December 31, 2021."
Thomson Reuters Practical Law
|
|
|
Is Interest on Plan Loans Double-Taxed?
"Yes, the interest on a loan is always paid with after-tax dollars that did not qualify for a tax deduction ... And, yes, a participant must pay taxes on interest received from the plan whether it was interest from an investment or interest the participant paid on a plan loan monies ... But, are the same dollars 'double taxed'? No. Simply, these are different amounts -- loan interest the participant paid and earnings the participant received from investments."
Plan Sponsor Council of America [PSCA]
|
|
|
|
|
Mortality Projection: Making Reasonable Assumptions About Future Lifetimes (PDF)
"The objective of this paper is to present methods an individual actuary, and the public plan retirement boards they work with, can use to select a reasonable mortality projection assumption that: [1] Is appropriate for the purpose of budgeting predictable pension contributions; [2] Reflects the actuary's professional judgment; [3] Takes into account relevant historical data; [4] Reflects the actuary's (and other parties) estimate of future experience; [5] Has no significant bias."
Milliman
|
For Many CFOs, Pension Plans Are Millstones Around the Neck
"Amid the shifting environment, these funds now require much more principal to be invested in order to get the expected result at payout. The maintenance and administration of old-school defined benefit plans has consequently become increasingly unsustainable for companies to manage."
CFO
|
Hope for SECURE Act in Year-End Funding Package
"Hill staff worked throughout the weekend to put the finishing touches on the nearly $1.4 trillion spending bill for FY 2020, which will likely be the last 'legislative vehicle' for 2019 -- and things look promising for the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement (SECURE) Act to be attached to that spending bill."
National Association of Plan Advisors [NAPA]
|
How to Calculate Your Annual ESOP Share Release
"There are two methods in which the release of shares is calculated: The Principal-Only method (or Special Rule) and the Principal and Interest method (or General Rule). The Principal-Only method is much less common, as the loan must meet certain requirements in order to qualify to use it."
Blue Ridge ESOP Associates
|
|
Selected Discussions on the BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
Partial Plan Termination Upon Withdrawal of Currently Participating Employer?
"A 2-company controlled group is ending as of 12/31/2019. Both participate in a 401(k) plan together. The Participating Employer likely will voluntarily end its participation at the end of the year. They aren't ready to have a new plan of their own. The plan document (yes, I read it) is silent on this exact scenario. The participating employer MAY choose to set up a successor/spin off plan. But nothing in the document says they have to. I think the old rule was that the discontinuance of a participating employer doesn't necessarily create a partial plan termination or distributable event because the employees haven't terminated employment. But I thought there was a narrow circumstance where it could be considered a partial plan term and distributable? Am I imagining that?"
BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most Popular Items in the Previous Issue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|