BenefitsLink.com logo
EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com logo

Health & Welfare Plans Newsletter

August 7, 2023

New Job Opportunity Today New Job Opportunity Today

 

[Guidance Overview]

Departments Release Proposed Mental Health Parity Regs: Key Changes for Employers

"[T]he Departments have stressed that even if an employer contracts with third-party administrators or other service providers to administer the plan, the employer is still obligated to ensure that the plan satisfies the requirements under MHPAEA.... Employers should pay special attention to ... two new 'areas of priority' added to the list included in the ... January 2022 Report to Congress: [1] impermissible exclusions of key treatments for mental health conditions and substance use disorders, and [2] adequacy standards for MH/SUD provider networks."  MORE >>

Winston & Strawn LLP

[Guidance Overview]

MHPAEA Compliance Will Be Top Health and Welfare Benefit Priority for Federal Regulators for Years to Come

"The proposed rules would for the first time provide employers with detail on the requirements for the 'comparative analysis' regarding nonquantitative treatment limitations that plans have to do under a 2021 statute. Outcomes data would be needed to evaluate material differences in access between MH/SUD providers and medical/surgical providers."  MORE >>

Ogletree Deakins

[Guidance Overview]

Departments Consider Potential Safe Harbor for Nonquantitative Treatment Limitations Under MHPAEA Regarding Network Adequacy

"If the proposed regulations are finalized, the Departments intend to create an enforcement safe harbor with respect to NQTLs related to network composition for plans and issuers that meet or exceed specific data-based standards. The exact standards will be identified in future guidance but are anticipated to be high standards."  MORE >>

The Wagner Law Group

No Surprises Act Arbitration Portal Temporarily Closed for Business After Providers' Latest Legal Victory

"[HHS, DOL] and Treasury on [August 4] temporarily shut down the system for settling disputes over out-of-network payment amounts under the No Surprises Act. A day earlier, a federal judge ... ruled that a 2023 change in the administrative fee from $50 to $350 per IDR case was unlawful because HHS did not use a notice-and-comment period before enacting the increase." [Texas Medical Association (TMA) v. HHS, No. 23-0059 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 3, 2023)]  MORE >>

Healthcare Financial Management Association [HFMA]; free registration required

Surprise Billing IDR Suspension Could Impact Plan Renewal Underwriting and Stop-Loss Coverage

"A lengthy delay in the Departments' correction of their rules could spell headaches for both payers and providers.... Many stop-loss policies and other funding arrangements limit or exclude coverage for plan claims not paid with the policy period or, if the policy includes run off coverage, that brief period following the policy year end. Delays in payment also could complicate year end underwriting for renewals." [Texas Medical Association (TMA) v. HHS, No. 23-0059 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 3, 2023)]   MORE >>

Solutions Law Press

California Court of Appeal Affirms Grant of Summary Judgment Against Out-of-Network Health Care Provider

"This ruling will likely have a significant impact on lawsuits brought by out-of-network health care providers seeking to recover additional monies directly from payors and claims administrators based on allegations that an oral or implied contract was formed during verification of benefits and/or authorization calls, or to assert other quasi-contract or equitable grounds for recovery against a health plan or insurer." [Aton Center, Inc. v. United Healthcare Ins. Co., No. D080122 (Cal. Ct. App. July 27, 2023)]  MORE >>

Troutman Pepper

District Court Grants Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Production of Unum's Legal Communications on ERISA LTD Claim

"Plaintiff asserted that the fiduciary exception to the attorney-client privilege applies to Unum's communications throughout the claim. Unum argued that the fiduciary exception did not apply because the liability 'exception to the exception' preserved the privilege.... [T]he Court found that Unum failed to establish that an adversarial relationship developed with Plaintiff before the dates of the communications listed on the privilege log." [Hardy v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America, No. 23-563 (D. Minn. July 28, 2023)]  MORE >>

Roberts Disability Law

Employee Benefits Jobs

View job as Retirement Plan Administrator
for Retirementplans.com, LLC

Retirement Plan Administrator

Retirementplans.com, LLC

Addison TX / Hybrid

Press Releases

DOL Obtains Consent Judgment Barring Aliera Healthcare, CEO Shelley Steele from Serving as ERISA Fiduciaries, Service Providers

Employee Benefits Security Administration [EBSA], U.S. Department of Labor

Webcasts and Conferences
(Health & Welfare Plans)

Mental Health Parity: What You Need to Know and Do

August 23, 2023 WEBINAR

Thompson Hine LLP

Last Issue's Most Popular Items

Employer Action Steps for New Mental Health Parity Rules (PDF)

Ice Miller LLP

Plan Committee Meeting Minutes: Components and Best Practices

MSN News

Treasury, DOL and HHS Issue Landmark Mental Health Parity Proposed Rule

McDermott Will & Emery

Unsubscribe  |   Change Email Address

Search Past Issues   |   Privacy Policy

Submit an Article   |   Contact Us   |   Advertise Here

Copyright 2023 BenefitsLink.com, Inc. All materials contained in this newsletter are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of BenefitsLink.com, Inc., or in the case of third party materials, the owner of those materials. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notices from copies of the content.

BenefitsLink® Retirement Plans Newsletter, ISSN no. 1536-9587.

Links to web sites other than BenefitsLink.com and EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com are offered as a service to our readers. We are not involved in their production and are not responsible for their content.