|
4 New Job Opportunities
|
|
[Official Guidance]
Text of PBGC Final Regs: Allocation of Assets in Single-Employer Plans: Valuation of Benefits and Assets; Expected Retirement Age
"This rule amends the [PBGC's] regulation on Allocation of Assets in Single-Employer Plans by substituting a new table for determining expected retirement ages for participants in pension plans undergoing distress or involuntary termination with valuation dates falling in
2024. This table is needed to compute the value of early retirement benefits and, thus, the total value of benefits under a plan.... This rule is effective January 1, 2024." MORE >>
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation [PBGC]
|
[Sponsor]
A Tailored Solution For All Your Compliance Needs
EI's industry-leading knowledge ensures that all your compliance needs are met. Our team integrates as a supplement or extension of yours to deliver savings via rightsized staffing and flexible costing models.
|
|
[Guidance Overview]
Not a Moment Too Soon: The LTPT Regulations Are Here
"The IRS seems to presume in the regulations that all LTPTs are, by definition, nonhighly compensated employees (NHCEs). However, this ignores the situation where a business owner is working in the business fewer than 1,000 hours during a year or where a child of the owners works
part-time.... [O]ne must question whether this is a potential area for creativity in the odd situation where an HCE is also an LTPT." MORE >>
Ferenczy Benefits Law Center
|
[Guidance Overview]
Informational Copies of 2023 Form 5500 Series Now Available
"Among other changes, the forms include: [1] A new Schedule MEP for multiple-employer plans (MEPs), including pooled employer plans (PEPs). [2] Updates for optional defined contribution (DC) group filing arrangements, including a new Schedule DCG.
[3] Changes to the method of determining whether a DC plan needs an audit report from an independent qualified public accountant. [4] Additional categories of administrative expenses on Schedule H. [5] Compliance questions relating to retirement plan nondiscrimination testing
and favorable opinion letters for preapproved plans." MORE >>
Mercer
|
[Guidance Overview]
A Guide to the DOL's Retirement Security Rule Proposal
"The Proposed Rule picks up an individualized recommendation to a retirement investor by an adviser that regularly provides investment recommendations to any investors and, therefore, many common 'one-time' advice scenarios that historically were not covered by the
fiduciary standard ... The omission of a 'sales' or 'sophisticated investor' safe harbor may leave a lack of clarity for many common marketing activities." MORE >>
Proskauer
|
[Guidance Overview]
Plan Sponsors Should Prepare for SECURE 2.0 Provisions That Take Effect in 2024
"[P]lan sponsors should coordinate with their recordkeepers, third-party administrators, and other advisors to ensure all desired changes are implemented (and undesired ones are not).... [T]he deadline to amend plan documents for these rules is not until December 31, 2025,
so plan sponsors need to keep good records of their elections so the eventual plan amendments will accurately reflect the plan's operation." MORE >>
Kaufman & Canoles, P.C.
|
[Sponsor]
Direct Answers to your ERISA & Retirement Plan Questions!
Our TAG experts average 25+ years of experience and comprehensively answer your retirement questions. TAG provides access to a database of 4,000+ FAQs, quick reference tools, and charts. Learn more!
|
|
A Victory for Plan Fiduciaries: Second Circuit Clarifies the Pleading Standard for Prohibited Transaction Claims
"The Second Circuit issued a well-reasoned opinion that may have significant implications for ERISA prohibited transaction claims at the pleading stage. The Second Circuit embraced a position that plan fiduciaries and their counsel have advanced for years: plaintiffs alleging a
prohibited transaction under ERISA section 406 must do more than merely allege facts that the transaction meets the technical elements of a party-in-interest transaction. Rather, the plaintiff must also plead plausible facts showing that ERISA section 408's statutory exemptions do not apply." [Cunningham v. Cornell Univ., No. 21-0088 (2d Cir. Nov. 14, 2023)] MORE >>
Groom Law Group
|
Ninth Circuit Decision Threatens Compensation Model for RPAs, Providers
"Many record keepers have been able to reduce expenses and offer low cost share classes because they receive annual 'stipends' from asset managers willing to pay the entry fee. Should those fees be considered when determining whether their compensation is
reasonable? ... Does the Bugielski precedent apply to the 'platform' fees paid to advisory firms by record keepers and assets managers? ... Do advisors disclose these payments?" [Bugielski v. AT&T Servs., Inc., No. 21-56196 (9th Cir.
Nov. 8, 23)] MORE >>
WealthManagement.com
|
Crypto Remains Massive Compliance Risk for Retirement Fiduciaries
"The Treasury Department issued a record-breaking multi-billion dollar fine against Binance ... further compounding the fiduciary risks of crypto assets.... The [SEC] in June had charged Binance with operating as an unregistered securities exchange and those allegations have
not yet been resolved." MORE >>
planadviser
|
What's on Tap for the Next Retirement Plan Policy Bill?
"Congress has quietly been putting forward new bipartisan proposals for consideration in the next round of retirement plan policymaking.... [1] Automatic reenrollment ... [2] Startup credit boost for micro employers ... [3] ERISA minimum age participation
requirement ... [4] Roth IRA rollovers ... [5] Retirement plan tax credits for charities." MORE >>
American Retirement Association [ARA]
|
[Opinion]
What Is IBM Doing with Its Retirement Plans? and Why?
"IBM held a surplus of about $3.5 billion in its DB plan, while it paid out $550 million annually in its matching contributions to the 401(k). Faced with no funding requirements for its over-funded plan, IBM can use the $3.5 billion surplus to pay for the 5-percent
annual contributions for at least the next 6 or 7 years -- improving its bottom line by $550 million each year.... [T]his clever maneuver -- while leaving employees worse off -- certainly benefits shareholders." MORE >>
Alicia Munnell, for the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College
|
Benefits in General |
Year-End Plan Sponsor 'To Do' Reminders and Updates for Your Company's Retirement and Health and Welfare Plans
"As the year is quickly coming to an end, it is critical that plan sponsors set some time aside to review and confirm operational and administrative practices throughout the year. As appropriate, operational errors may be corrected and documented before the close of the year with
significantly reduced consequences." MORE >>
Husch Blackwell
|
Executive Compensation and Nonqualified Plans |
[Guidance Overview]
SEC Disclosure Requirements for Equity Grants: What You Need to Know for 2024
"New Item 402(x) ... adds disclosure requirements to annual proxy statements ... For calendar year-end companies, this disclosure will be required in the Form 10-K and proxy statements to be filed in early 2025. However, because the tabular disclosure may be required with respect to option grants made in calendar year 2024, public companies should review and consider changes to their equity grant policies and procedures now." MORE >>
Debevoise & Plimpton LLP
|
'Computed Without Regard to Taxes Paid': The Individual Tax Consequences of Compensation Clawbacks (PDF)
"[F]or clawbacks that are effected on a gross (pretax) basis, questions arise as to how the clawback is treated for income tax purposes and what avenues an individual may have for recovering any taxes previously paid on the recouped amount. ... [T]he answers to these
questions are far from straightforward, often counterintuitive, and largely dependent on the facts and circumstances of the original payment and its clawback. As a result, an affected individual's likelihood of being made whole for taxes previously paid on recouped compensation will often need to be critically evaluated by a personal tax advisor." MORE >>
Wilmer Hale
|
Employee Benefits Jobs |
|
|
|
|
|
Selected New Discussions |
Amending Another Provider's Pre-Approved Plan Doc on Same Platform
"Plan Document for 401k Plan was created in the name of the now prior TPA. New TPA uses the same platform/vendor for said Plan Document. Can Plan Document be amended using existing Plan Document either of the following two conditions: - New TPA has its documents
under its name
- New TPA does not have its documents under its name
Note: Plan Document is going to be amended in full under new TPA, but certain errors in original TPA document need to be corrected retroactively, and trying to determine best approach."
BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
Partnership Splitting and Want Their Own Plans
"Law firm Partnership XYZ is splitting (no PBGC coverage). Currently sponsor a DB and DC plans. 2 partners and a bunch of employees. Partner Mary wants to keep the current plans. Partner Joe wants to set up his own DB/DC combo in his new company. Joe also will take a few
employees with him. Other than treating Joe and a few employees as terminated and carrying over the benefits accrued in the DB plan to the new law firm, is there anyway to transfer DB benefits for Joe and the employees coming with him? Or new plan(s) has to be set up for Joe's new company? For the DC plan which has deferrals+SH+PS, if a new plan needs to be established for 2023, can SH still be set up for 2023?"
BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
415 Compensation Limit in Frozen Plans: Does It Stop Increasing at Freeze?
"Assume DB plan frozen in 2015, no future credited service or pay -- hard freeze. Older participants working significantly past normal retirement have a solid chance of running into compensation limit even if they're well below the dollar limit (pleasant workplace and
working very late age full time not uncommon). When I read 415 regulations, I see that the compensation limit is described as being based on compensation earned during 'years of service'. When you follow the link defining years of service, describes service credited for benefits. Service to the company doesn't stop, but the freeze stops earning years of benefit service. Participants continue to get pay increases as time passes.
Assume all participants are full time -- no phony active participants 'working late in life' but not actually showing up. When doing the final retirement calculation, which years of compensation are allowed: [1] only those earned prior to the hard freeze? [2] years that would've otherwise met the definition for service except for the freeze amendment through cessation of employment (as in, all years of employment,
not just years before freeze)?"
BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
|
Press Releases |
Nomination Period Open for 2024 Plan Sponsor of the Year Awards
PLANSPONSOR
|
ICARE and Aerobodies Partner to Eradicate Workplace Addiction
ICARE [International Center for Addiction and Recovery Education]
|
Aon Pooled Employer Plan Reaches $2 Billion in U.S. Plan Assets and Commitments
Aon plc
|
|
Webcasts and Conferences (Retirement Plans / Executive Compensation) |
Navigating the ERISA Fiduciary Advice Proposal
December 13, 2023 WEBINAR
National Association of Plan Advisors [NAPA]
|
Innovation in Employee Benefits: The Power of Progress
January 25, 2024 in MA
New England Employee Benefits Council [NEEBC]
|
|
Last Issue's Most Popular Items |
New LTPT Proposed Regs Drop as Effective Date Looms
American Retirement Association [ARA]
|
Long Term, Part Time Employees, Part 1
DWC
|
Long Term, Part Time Employees, Part 2
DWC
|
Unsubscribe |
Change Email Address
Search Past Issues |
Privacy Policy
Submit an Article |
Contact Us |
Advertise Here
Copyright 2023 BenefitsLink.com, Inc. All materials contained in this newsletter are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of BenefitsLink.com, Inc., or in the case of third party materials, the owner of those materials. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notices from copies of the content.
BenefitsLink® Retirement Plans Newsletter, ISSN no. 1536-9587.
Links to web sites other than BenefitsLink.com and EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com are offered as a service to our readers. We are not involved in their production and are not responsible for their content.
|