|
|
|
2 New Job Opportunities
|
| |
|
[Guidance Overview]
Agencies Launch SECURE 2.0 Reporting and Disclosure Review
"The RFI's two dozen questions ask stakeholders for input on aspects of current disclosure and reporting requirements for
retirement plans ... These questions encompass the ERISA and IRC reporting and disclosure requirements for retirement plans. The agencies explain that in their view, 'disclosure' refers to plans providing information to participants and beneficiaries, while 'reporting' refers to plans providing information to the agencies." MORE >>
Mercer
|
|
Second Circuit Upholds Rejection of 401(k) Plan Complaint Against Goldman Sachs
"Although the plaintiff argued that plan executives didn't establish a formal process for selecting and monitoring investments, the district court disagreed -- and so did the appeals court. The investment committee 'followed a rigorous and deliberative process when
selecting and monitoring investments,' the appeals court judges wrote." [Falberg v. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., No. 22-2689 (2d Cir. Feb. 14, 2024)] MORE >>
Pensions & Investments
|
|
House HELP Subcommittee Hearing: Protecting American Savers and Retirees from DOL's Regulatory Overreach
Subcommittee on Health, Employment, Labor, and Pensions, Committee on Education and the Workforce, U.S. House of Representatives
|
|
Common Retirement Plan Errors
"The remittance of participant deferrals 'as soon as administratively possible' means as soon as possible, not as soon as convenient.... Many administrative errors go on for years, and every year not corrected is another fiduciary breach.... The manner in which hours are
calculated, hiring dates, and compensation calculations could be problematic.... Maintaining and following an IPS is of utmost importance.... When detected early by the plan, many ERISA compliance errors can be corrected through voluntary compliance programs to reduce the potential for fines and penalties." MORE >>
Savant
|
|
Annuity Buy-Ins: Exploring a New Pension Risk Management Option
"Unlike the annuity buy-out, assets and liabilities in an annuity buy-in contract continue to be reported in key ongoing plan measures. The market value of the buy-in contract remains an asset of the plan ... Annuity buy-in contracts hedge related risks associated with the
corresponding liabilities without transferring assets or liabilities out of the plan, and therefore wouldn't trigger settlement charges. They can be thought of as 'perfect LDI' in helping to solve these concerns." MORE >>
Principal Financial Group
|
|
Annuity Purchase Update, February 2024
"The influx of market activity ... in 2023, lead some insurance carriers to revisit their underwriting guidelines -- increasing their minimum transaction size and even requiring more lead time to review placements.... Primarily driven by high annuity purchase interest
rates, last year marked a record high with an estimated 700 annuity transactions." MORE >>
October Three Consulting
|
|
Alaska Considers Reopening DB Plans for Teachers and Public Employees
"[Alaska] is closer than ever to reopening [two DB] plans as it faces a recruitment and retention crisis for general employees, teachers and public safety officials.... [One] analysis ... shows the state could save $76 million annually by reopening the DB plans....
[Many employees] are leaving the state to work in the lower 48 where public employees are able to participate in DB plans." MORE >>
Pensions & Investments
|
|
Uncashed IRA Distribution Check? Here's What to Do
"Generally, a distribution from an IRA is treated as income for the year the amount leaves the IRA. However, an uncashed check could cause different results, depending on who writes the check. If it is the IRA custodian, the tax impact is not affected. But if the IRA owner writes
the check and it is uncashed by year-end, that would mean including the amount in income for a different year than planned." MORE >>
Morningstar
|
|
[Opinion]
Will Changes to Multiple Employer Plans Put a Dent in the Coverage Gap?
"The removal of the common bond and bad apple restrictions has generated a lot of excitement, particularly among financial services firms. Indeed, PEPs have several potential advantages over the plethora of existing options for small employers. PEPs can reduce the administrative
burden, the fiduciary responsibility and -- perhaps -- the cost of offering a plan, while maintaining the ability to select the provider of choice and offer employer matches. Despite the enthusiasm, the initial uptake has been slow and PEPs may have a limited impact on the coverage gap for a number of reasons." MORE >>
Alicia Munnell, via Center for Retirement Research at Boston College
|
Benefits in General |
|
Impact on ERISA Regulation If Supreme Court Throws Chevron Deference Overboard
"Two current ERISA hot topics ... are the proposed Retirement Security Rule (the fiduciary rule) and the Prudence and Loyalty in Selecting Plan Investments and Exercising Shareholder Rights rule (ESG rule). If the Court abandons or curtails the Chevron deference,
ERISA regulations adopted by the [DOL] may be more heavily scrutinized, modified, or vacated by federal courts." MORE >>
Morgan Lewis
|
Executive Compensation and Nonqualified Plans |
|
Recommend a Nonqualified Plan for Clients with 401(k) Plan Testing Issues
"Requiring HCEs to defer only to the NQDC plan makes it possible for the 401(k) plan to meet its testing requirements while preserving HCEs' ability to defer salary and receive a matching contribution. If HCEs are allowed to defer to both the 401(k) plan and the NQDC plan,
deferrals into the NQDC plan can help offset income taxes attributable to any required refunds from the 401(k) plan. Employers can implement NQDC plans without the financial burden of having to make additional contributions to a 401(k) plan." MORE >>
Ascensus
|
|
Employee Benefits Jobs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected New Discussions |
|
Confused About Segment Rates
"I am doing some modelling trying to forecast the segment rates for 2024 EOY valuation. I am getting 4.75/4.96/5.59 for 430 and 5.03/5.27/5.23 for 404. Leaving the technicalities apart, thus my conclusion is that for 2024 the min and max are the same and are driven by 430 rates.
This is totally insane, what am I missing?"
BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
|
Changing Mandatory Distributions Amount Directly from $1,000 to $7,000
"We've been taking the conservative position (rightly or wrongly) that the jump to $7,000 only applies if the plan ALREADY has a $5,000 limit. A plan that has a $1,000 limit, we've been amending to $5,000, then operationally switching to $7,000. The FIS plan termination
amendment, which of course isn't IRS approved language, does provide an option to jump directly from $1,000 to $7,000. But, this is a termination amendment, not an amendment for an ongoing plan. I believe in one of the webcasts quite a while ago, there was some musing that operationally jumping directly from $1,000 to $7,000 operationally, and catching up with the formal SECURE/2.0 amendments, would be acceptable, but that was REALLY
unofficial -- just some general discussion. Anyone have any new thoughts on this subject?"
BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
|
Profit Sharing Contribution for Only One Company Within Controlled Group
"We have 401(k) plans that cover 4 businesses using participation agreements between the plans, using one of the plan documents as the master plan. There is common ownership among the companies, making it a controlled group. Plan provisions allow a discretionary profit sharing
contribution. One of the companies has had a very profitable year, while the other 3 only so- so. Can the successful company make a profit sharing payment, while the other 3 do not? Also, Successful company's owner (100%) does not take any salary, so would not benefit from the profit sharing payment."
BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
|
|
Press Releases |
|
RPA Announces Key Leadership Updates
Retirement Plan Advisors [RPA]
|
|
|
Webcasts and Conferences (Retirement Plans / Executive Compensation) |
|
What If Plan Fees Go to Zero?
February 15, 2024 PODCAST
The 401(k) Marketing Podcast
|
|
IRA Fundamentals
February 22, 2024 WEBINAR
Ascensus
|
|
IRA Contributions and Tax Time
March 5, 2024 WEBINAR
Ascensus
|
|
Employee Benefits Changes in 2024: New Requirements for Part-Time Employees and Independent Contractors
March 7, 2024 WEBINAR
McDermott Will & Emery LLP
|
|
Structuring Employee Severance/Separation Arrangements: Revisiting Section 409A and Its Impact on Deferred Compensation
March 14, 2024 WEBINAR
Strafford
|
|
|
Last Issue's Most Popular Items |
|
Correcting Plan Errors: Calculating Earnings
Belfint Lyons Shuman
|
|
A Term Employers Should Remember: 'Fiduciary Duties'
MZQ Consulting, LLC
|
|
IRS Grab Bag Brings Clarity to Certain SECURE Act 2.0 Provisions
Fisher Phillips
|
|
Unsubscribe |
Change Email Address
Search Past Issues |
Privacy Policy
Submit an Article |
Contact Us |
Advertise Here
Copyright 2024 BenefitsLink.com, Inc. All materials contained in this newsletter are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of BenefitsLink.com, Inc., or in the case of third party materials, the owner of those materials. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notices from copies of the content.
BenefitsLink® Retirement Plans Newsletter, ISSN no. 1536-9587.
Links to web sites other than BenefitsLink.com and EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com are offered as a service to our readers. We are not involved in their production and are not responsible for their content.
|