| |
|
|
|
New Job Opportunity Today
|
| |
|
[Guidance Overview]
IRS Issues New Regs on Plan-Specific Mortality Tables Used for Present Value Calculations
"The final regulations provide rules regarding the use of mortality experience data for the COVID-19 pandemic period that
supplement the methodology for developing substitute mortality tables Treas. Reg. Section 1.430(h)(3)-2 provides. These final rules have the same structure as those included in the proposed regulations, but eliminate the adjustment for 2023 and provide for a different adjustment for 2022." MORE >>
American Retirement Association [ARA]
|
|
[Sponsor]
Webinar - What’s Happening on the Hill: PBGC, NCCMP, Morgan Lewis
Join a live discussion on Thursday, August 15th to learn about current and proposed pension related mandates from the PBGC and DOL. Panelists: Jim Donofrio, Mariah Becker and Randall McGeorge. Host: Berwyn University.
|
|

|
|
[Guidance Overview]
Amendments to the Forty-Year-Old QPAM Rule: What RIAs Managing Retirement Plan Money Need to Know
"Stricter requirements for RIAs include mandatory DOL notification, higher asset thresholds, expanded ineligibility, and independent decision-making. RIAs must meet increased AUM and equity thresholds by 2024, with deadlines for DOL notification and cure periods. RIAs must
maintain accessible compliance records for six years to meet the enhanced record-keeping obligations under the QPAM Exemption." MORE >>
Reed Smith
|
|
[Guidance Overview]
IRS Issues Proposed Regs on Required Minimum Distributions
"These proposed regulations aim to clarify and expand upon several provisions that were purposely left open in the concurrently
issued final RMD regulations in order to provide stakeholders a notice and comment period on these proposed rules.... [1] DC and DB plans: Applicable age for RMDs for individuals born in 1959 ... [2] DC plans: Aggregation option for annuity contracts ...
[3] DC plans: RMDs from designated Roth accounts ... [4] DC and DB plans: Corrective distributions and excise tax reduction ... [5] DC and DB plans: Surviving spouse elections for RMDs." MORE >>
Milliman
|
|
[Guidance Overview]
IRS Issues Final RMD Regs for SECURE and SECURE 2.0 Act Changes
"This bulletin summarizes the key RMD provisions of the final regulations for employer-sponsored retirement plans, including
qualified defined benefit (DB) plans and defined contribution (DC) plans, 403(b) plans, and 457(b) plans.... These regulations finalize the proposed RMD regulations published on February 24, 2022 (as corrected on March 21, 2022, and May 20, 2022), and generally follow those earlier proposed regulations without substantial change." MORE >>
Milliman
|
|
[Guidance Overview]
New RMD Regs Have a Surprising Result for Minor Child Beneficiaries
"Under the SECURE Act, a minor child of the account owner is considered an eligible designated beneficiary and can stretch distributions from an inherited IRA over their life expectancy until reaching age 21. Once this age is reached, the 10-year rule applies. However, the final
RMD relations retain a surprising twist introduced by proposed regulations back in 2022. The rule requiring annual RMDs to continue also applies during the 10-year period, regardless of whether the parent died before or after the required beginning date for the parent's own RMDs." MORE >>
Slott Report
|
|
[Guidance Overview]
Guidance Issued for SECURE 2.0's New Exceptions to the 10% Early Withdrawal Penalties
"[IRS Notice 2024-55 provides] guidance on
the implementation of two new exceptions to the 10% early withdrawal penalties under IRC Section 72. Sections 115 and 314 of the SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 created emergency personal expense distributions and domestic abuse victim distributions, respectively. These provisions are optional for plan sponsors to adopt and are effective for distributions after Dec. 31, 2023." MORE >>
MissionSquare
|
|
401(k) Advice Rule Hits Major Roadblock in District Courts
"The fiduciary rule, which would expand strict conduct standards to include more retirement advice providers, seems less likely to become effective as scheduled beginning Sept. 23 after the temporary stay granted July 25 in the US District Court for the Eastern District
of Texas and another the following day in a separate Northern District of Texas challenge." [FACC. v. DOL, No. 24-0163 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 25, 2024); ACLI v. DOL, No. 24-0482 (N.D. Tex. Jul. 26, 2024)] MORE >>
Bloomberg Law
|
|
District Courts Stay Effective Date of DOL's Fiduciary Rule
"The fiduciary rule amendments were scheduled to become effective on September 23, 2024 (with a one-year phase-in period for certain amendments to PTEs 84-24 and 2020-02). However, the courts in FACC and ACLI provided that the rulings apply nationwide and are not limited to
the parties in the cases. Following the rulings, the DOL's 2024 fiduciary rulemaking is now on hold pending additional notice from the courts. The five-part test in the 1975 rule continues to be in effect." [FACC. v. DOL, No. 24-0163 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 25, 2024); ACLI v. DOL, No. 24-0482 (N.D. Tex. Jul. 26, 2024)] MORE >>
Thomson Reuters Practical Law
|
|
Two California District Courts Split on ERISA Forfeited Contributions
"These courts have held that the decision of how to allocate forfeited contributions is a fiduciary decision. Plan sponsors should keep this in mind when deciding who determines how such funds are allocated and be cognizant that the decision of how such funds are allocated may be
scrutinized later. In both cases, the HP and Qualcomm defendants correctly followed the terms of the plans. If forfeited contributions are used in a manner inconsistent with the terms of the plan, this may expose fiduciaries to additional avenues of liability." [Perez-Cruet v. Qualcomm
Inc., No. 23-1890 (S.D. Calif. May 24, 2024); Hutchins v. HP Inc., No. 23-5875 (N.D. Calif. Jun. 17, 2024)] MORE >>
Alston & Bird
|
|
Beyond the Retirement Crisis Headlines: Why Employer-Sponsored Plans Are the Key to Retirement Adequacy for Today's Workers
23 pages. "This report ... analyzes the likelihood that today's US workers will have adequate financial resources in retirement. Finding One: Assuming status quo for Social Security, Baby Boomers and Gen Xers are more likely to experience retirement shortfalls than other generations of today's workers. Finding Two: There will likely be a retirement crisis ... for those who do not or are unable
to participate in a defined contribution plan. Finding Three: There is expected to be considerable dispersion in retirement outcomes with lower income workers much more likely to experience shortfalls. Finding Four: Hispanic and Black Americans are much more likely to run short of money in retirement than Americans of other race and ethnic backgrounds. Finding Five: About 45% of current US workers will
experience retirement funding shortfalls, with females who are single at retirement age more at risk than single males and couples. Finding Six: Retirement funding ratios vary substantially by industry, with public sector workers most prepared for retirement. Finding Seven: Only about 28% of us households would experience shortfalls if retiring at 70, compared to 45% if retiring at 65." [Also available: Technical appendix] MORE >>
Morningstar Center for Retirement and Policy Studies; free registration required for full report
|
Benefits in General |
|
[Official Guidance]
IRS Disaster Relief Notice KY-2024-03, for Victims in Kentucky
"[I]ndividuals and businesses in Kentucky that were affected by severe storms, straight-line winds, tornadoes, landslides, and mudslides that began on May 21, 2024 ... now have until Feb. 3, 2025, to file various federal individual and business tax returns and make
tax payments.... [I]ndividuals and households that reside or have a business in Adair, Allen, Ballard, Barren, Breckinridge, Butler, Caldwell, Calloway, Carlisle, Christian, Clay, Clinton, Crittenden, Cumberland, Edmonson, Estill, Fulton, Garrard, Graves, Grayson, Green, Greenup, Hart, Hickman, Hopkins, Jackson, Knox, Larue, Laurel, Lee, Leslie, Livingston, Logan, Lyon, Marshall, McCracken, McCreary, McLean, Meade, Menifee, Metcalfe, Monroe,
Muhlenberg, Ohio, Owsley, Pulaski, Rockcastle, Russell, Simpson, Todd, Trigg, Warren, Washington, Wayne, Whitley, and Woodford counties qualify for tax relief." MORE >>
Internal Revenue Service [IRS]
|
|
Employee Benefit and Employment Law Regs After Loper Bright
"To the extent DOL conceived in its Fiduciary Rule 4.0 that it was appointed by Congress in ERISA to be a universal financial services regulator ... for example, or the Federal Trade Commission conceived in its non-compete rule that Congress had authorized it to displace
state law on that issue, the early returns from the courts hearing challenges to those regulations are pointing in the direction of a greater check on agency power." [Loper Bright Enterprises, Inc. v. Raimondo, Sec. of Comm., No. 22-451 (S. Ct. Jun. 28,
2024)] MORE >>
Eversheds Sutherland
|
|
Supreme Court 2024 Rulings Usher in a New Era for Health Insurance and Retirement Benefits Regs
"these rulings could affect how stakeholders view the significant rulemaking activities undertaken affecting coverage, including the annual notice of benefit and payment parameters ... The recent Supreme Court decisions are also expected to significantly impact retirement plan
operations and administration, particularly in terms of compliance, investment strategies, and participant outcomes." [SEC v. Jarkesy, No. 22-859 (S. Ct. Jun. 27, 2024); Loper Bright Enterprises, Inc. v. Raimondo, Sec. of Comm., No. 22-451 (S. Ct. Jun. 28, 2024); Corner Post v. Bd. of Gov. of
the Federal Reserve System, No. 22-1008 (S. Ct. Jul. 1, 2024)] MORE >>
Milliman
|
|
Employee Benefits Jobs
|
|
|
|
|
Selected New Discussions |
|
Reasonable DB Plan NRA for a Boxer
"I am looking into a DB plan design for a professional boxer and researching what a reasonable NRA is for a new DB plan. Currently, age is mid 20s. I looked online and on average, it is age 37. Some retire in the 20s, early to late thirties. On very exceptional situations, past
40. So, using NRA of 35-37 seems reasonable with a 10 YOP for a DB plan. Apparently planning to retire within 5 to 7 years. Any comments?"
BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
|
Showing Pooled Plan Fees (Or Not) on Participant Statements
"I've got a pooled plan where the plan sponsor doesn't want to show the investment fees separately from other gains/losses. He says that it's net gains that matters -- if the net is better than 'average', then the participants are fine. He is fine with it
showing on the SAR, and he is happy to tell his participants that the fees on the SAR are net against the total gains on their statement. That isn't sitting well with me. I'd think that in a pooled plan, the disclosure standard is even higher since all the assets are controlled by the trustee. The fact that there are lawsuits about fees seems to indicate that disclosing fees so they can be monitored is the right thing to do. So my
question is, is there something in black and white that supports either side?"
BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
|
|
Press Releases |
|
Worldwide Employee Benefits Network, a Preeminent Member Network of Employee Benefits and Retirement Professionals, Celebrates the 50th Anniversary of ERISA
Worldwide Employee Benefits Network [WEB]
|
|
Schlichter Bogard Receives National Recognition from Chambers and Partners
Schlichter Bogard
|
|
|
Webcasts and Conferences (Retirement Plans / Executive Compensation) |
|
Fiduciary Rule Paused By Courts
August 2, 2024 WEBINAR
Groom Law Group
|
|
|
Last Issue's Most Popular Items |
|
Average 401(k) Balance by Age in 2024
Business Insider
|
|
More Guidance Needed for SECURE 2.0's Student Loan Matching Contribution Programs
Thompson Hine
|
|
Text of IRS Final Regs: Plan-Specific Substitute Mortality Tables for Determining Present Value
Internal Revenue Service [IRS]
|
|
Unsubscribe |
Change Email Address
Search Past Issues |
Privacy Policy
Submit an Article |
Contact Us |
Advertise Here
Copyright 2024 BenefitsLink.com, Inc. All materials contained in this newsletter are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of BenefitsLink.com, Inc., or in the case of third party materials, the owner of those materials. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notices from copies of the content.
BenefitsLink® Retirement Plans Newsletter, ISSN no. 1536-9587.
Links to web sites other than BenefitsLink.com and EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com are offered as a service to our readers. We are not involved in their production and are not responsible for their content.
|
|
|
|