|
New Job Opportunity Today
|
|
[Guidance Overview]
Year-of-Death RMD Deadline Extended for Beneficiaries
"Historically, the deadline for [a beneficiary to complete] the year-of-death RMD was December 31 of the year OF death.... In the IRS's final regulations, the deadline to take the year-of-death RMD is officially extended ... The new deadline is the later of
[1] the tax filing deadline for the taxable year of the beneficiary that begins with or within the calendar year in which the individual died. and [2] the end of the following calendar year.' For most beneficiaries, this means the year-of-death deadline in now December 31 of the year AFTER the year of death." MORE >>
Slott Report
|
[Sponsor]
Retirement Saving, Pensions, and ERISA at 50: Where Do We Go From Here?
Complimentary webinar Sept. 18. Mark Iwry will share his perspective on current and future developments and proposed reforms to strengthen the retirement system. For nearly three decades, Mark has fervently worked to craft national policies and develop innovative retirement solutions.
|
|
[Guidance Overview]
IRS Issues Guidance on Withdrawals for Domestic Abuse Victims
"[V]ictims of domestic abuse can now withdraw funds from their retirement plans without incurring the usual early withdrawal penalty. To qualify, the withdrawal must be made within one year of the individual being victimized by domestic abuse from a spouse or domestic partner.
[Notice 2024-55] elaborates on several key points: [1] Definition of domestic abuse victim distributions.... [2] Eligible retirement plans.... [3] Dollar limitation." MORE >>
RPAG
|
[Guidance Overview]
IRS Provides Guidance on Emergency Personal Expense and Domestic Abuse Victim Distributions Under SECURE 2.0
"Plan administrators may rely on participants' written certifications that they are eligible for an EPED or DAVD.... 401(k) plan sponsors can allow amounts attributable to elective, qualified nonelective, qualified matching, or safe harbor contributions to be included in the
distribution.... direct rollovers need not be offered, Code Section 402(f) notices need not be provided, and no 20% mandatory income tax withholding is required from such distributions.... An applicable retirement plan must accept repayment of EPEDs or DAVDs from the participant within a 3-year period following receipt if [certain conditions] apply." MORE >>
Locke Lord LLP
|
Eleventh Circuit Reiterates That Burden of Proving Loss Causation Stays with Plaintiffs
"The Eleventh Circuit's decision may generate renewed interest in the existing circuit split on whether there is burden-shifting on loss causation when a plaintiff establishes procedural imprudence and loss to the plan, and presents another opportunity for the Supreme Court
to weigh in on the issue. Although in some ways procedural in nature, the burden-shifting issue has the ability to materially impact the outcome of ERISA fiduciary-breach claims at the summary judgment stage or at trial." [Pizarro v. Home Depot, No. 22-13643 (11th Cir.
Aug. 2, 2024)] MORE >>
Proskauer
|
Update on Forfeiture Cases
"[S]kepticism about the ease with which these forfeiture cases might be easily dismissed was borne out first by the Qualcomm ruling and now by the Intuit court and their point-by-point resolutions of issues in favor of the plaintiffs. At the same time, the HP Inc., decision with
its full consideration of the many issues raised in these cases and its robust ruling in favor of defendants demonstrates that plaintiffs also have a long way to go to succeed in these cases." MORE >>
The Wagner Law Group
|
Smaller Than We Thought? the Effect of Automatic Savings Policies
"[A]nalysis of nine 401(k) plans incorporates the facts that employees frequently leave firms (often before matching contributions from their employer have fully vested), a large percentage of 401(k) balances are withdrawn upon employment separation, and many employees opt out of
auto-escalation. Steady-state saving rates increase by 0.6% of income due to automatic enrollment and 0.3% of income due to default auto-escalation. Only 40% of those with an auto-escalation default escalate on their first escalation date, and more opt out later." MORE >>
National Bureau of Economic Research [NBER]; purchase may be required for full document
|
Unintended Effects of Benefit-Tier-Related Public Pension Reforms
"Cost savings were expected to be realized over the long term as members of the new benefit tier gradually phased into the active population. What may not have been as clear was the influence the changes would have on employee behavior and morale as well as the resulting broader
impact." MORE >>
Segal
|
Most Public Employees Leave Jobs Before They Vest in Pension Systems
"Combining the 12 plans reviewed, approximately 62% of public workers leave before vesting in their pension plan.... [P]ublic employees do not stay marginally longer in their roles to ensure they vest in their pensions.... Most new hires -- who leave before vesting --
will only get back their contributions upon leaving, but not the significant amounts contributed by their employers to their retirement plans." MORE >>
Reason Foundation
|
Advisor Expertise Generates Stronger Results for Plan Sponsors
"81% of sponsors are highly satisfied with their advisor, up from 63% in 2019 and 76% in 2023. Nearly 50% of surveyed sponsors report it being 'very important' advisors provide guidance on HSAs -- a 21% jump from 25% in 2023. 81% of plan sponsors said plan advisors should
be allowed to work with employees outside their respective plan to support their broader financial planning needs." MORE >>
Fidelity
|
PBGC Approves $31.6 Million in SFA for Newspaper Drivers Local 473 Plan
"[PBGC] has approved the application submitted ... by the Retirement Benefit Plan of the Newspaper and Magazine Drivers, Chauffeurs and Handlers Union Local 473. The plan, based in Valley View, Ohio, covers 804 participants in the transportation industry ... [and] will
receive approximately $31.6 million in special financial assistance ... The plan was projected to become insolvent and run out of money in 2034." MORE >>
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation [PBGC]
|
Employee Benefits Jobs
|
|
|
Selected New Discussions |
Is This a Distributable Event?
"Doctor A, age 45, has her own corporation, Corp A. Corp A is a participating employer in the ABC 401(k) PSP, sponsored by Group G. Doctor A decides to move out of state and leave Group G, and her corporation signs a new contract with Group H, which has
no affiliation with Group G. Corp A signs a 'Withdrawal as Participating Employer' document to cease participation in the ABC 401(k) PSP. Group H sponsors the DEF 401(k) PSP. Corp A receives no further revenue from Group G; all of its revenue is now from Group H. What options does Doctor A have with respect to her ABC 401(k) PSP account, which includes salary deferrals as well as 2 other money types? Can
she establish a rollover IRA? Or is the only option to become a participating employer in the DEF 401(k) PSP, and establish an account registered as such?"
BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
Terminated Employee Entitled to excess assets?
"We administer a 2 participant traditional defined benefit plan, a 100% shareholder and an employee. The plan has been in place for 10 years and has a calendar year end. 3 months ago the one employee/participant quit to move across the county. She was paid her 100% vested
benefit. Today the 100% shareholder called and mentioned that she wants to retire next month and terminate the plan. Question: If the plan is terminated this month and distributed to the 100% shareholder by October there may be a small amount of excess assets that can be absorbed by the 100% shareholder. Must the terminated employee who was distributed fully three months ago be entitled to any of the excess assets?"
BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
Question re QSLOB Analysis
"My client has two business entities that are commonly controlled. One entity conducts the business operations (Entity 1). The other entity (Entity 2) provides administrative support (e.g., payroll, HR, etc.) for both entities. Ideally, my client would like to offer a 401(k) plan for the employees of Entity 2. However, due to the demographics of Entity 1 and Entity 2's employees, and due to
the fact they are commonly controlled, offering a 401(k) plan to only the employees of Entity 2 would likely result in coverage testing issues. My initial thought was to have Entity 2 make an election to be a QSLOB. My question relates to the 50 employee requirement. Specifically, Treas. Reg. Section 1.414(r)-4(b) requires those 50 employers to 'not
provide services to any other separate line of business of the employer for the testing year.' Am I correct in saying that, if Entity 2 made a QSLOB election, that Entity 1 would be treated as a 'other separate line of business', even if Entity 1 does not make a separate QSLOB election for itself? If the question prompts any alternative solutions that
would allow Entity 2 to sponsor a 401(k) plan, I would be interested in hearing them."
BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
|
Press Releases |
HUB International Deepens Personalization of Employee Benefits with Clinical Informatics Resources
HUB International
|
|
Webcasts and Conferences (Retirement Plans / Executive Compensation) |
Fiduciary Compliance in ESOP Transactions: Recent Settlement Agreements and Guidance on Avoiding Litigation
October 3, 2024 WEBINAR
Strafford
|
|
Last Issue's Most Popular Items |
New Rules for Correction of Missed Deferral Opportunities
Newfront
|
Draft of 2024 Instructions for IRS Forms 1099-R and 5498 (PDF)
Internal Revenue Service [IRS]
|
IRS Releases Final RMD Regs
Ascensus
|
Unsubscribe |
Change Email Address
Search Past Issues |
Privacy Policy
Submit an Article |
Contact Us |
Advertise Here
Copyright 2024 BenefitsLink.com, Inc. All materials contained in this newsletter are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of BenefitsLink.com, Inc., or in the case of third party materials, the owner of those materials. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notices from copies of the content.
BenefitsLink® Retirement Plans Newsletter, ISSN no. 1536-9587.
Links to web sites other than BenefitsLink.com and EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com are offered as a service to our readers. We are not involved in their production and are not responsible for their content.
|