Get This Daily Newsletter by Email

BenefitsLink.com logo
EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com logo

Trusted Since 1995

Retirement Plans Newsletter

November 14, 2024

3 New Job Opportunities 3 New Job Opportunities

 

[Guidance Overview]

Must-Knows About RMDs as 2024 Winds Down

"[1] Most investors should be bracing themselves for higher RMDs in 2024. [2] Investors can use their RMDs to remove risk from their portfolios. [3] Investors that are 70.5 and older can use QCDs to reduce the tax burden of RMDs before they have to take them. [4] If an RMD is uncomfortably large for what someone would like to withdraw from their portfolio, they can reinvest elsewhere. [5] Even with recent changes under the SECURE Act, the penalties of missed RMDs underscore the value of not waiting until the last minute in the year to take that RMD."  MORE >>

Morningstar

[Sponsor]

Modernize Your Legacy Systems with Enterprise Iron’s Expertise!

Overwhelmed by outdated legacy systems? Enterprise Iron partners with you to modernize, boost security, and reduce costs using proven tools. Unlock agility and future-readiness. Start your journey -- download our whitepaper here!

Sponsored by Enterprise Iron

[Guidance Overview]

IRS Regs Clarify Non-U.S. Income Tax Withholding on Certain Distributions from Employer Deferred Compensation Plans

"Withholding generally is required for payments made to payees with a residence address located within the U.S. if the payee provides payment instructions indicating that the funds are to be delivered outside of the U.S. Withholding generally is required for payments made to payees with a residence address located outside of the U.S. even if the payee requests that the funds be deposited with a financial institution located within the U.S.... The Regulations apply to payments and distributions made on or after January 1, 2026"  MORE >>

Haynes and Boone, LLP

[Guidance Overview]

Things to Worry About, Part 3: Correcting a Failure to Implement Automatic Enrollment

"[T]he eased corrections are only available where the plan sponsor failure to automatically enroll eligible employees is due to a reasonable administrative error. Unfortunately, SECURE 2.0 didn't define that term.... [W]hat about a failure due to not knowing that the law required automatic enrollment (for example, for a 401(k) plan that was set up on or after December 29, 2022)? Ordinarily, ignorance of the law is not a reasonable basis for failing to comply with a law."  MORE >>

FredReish.com

CRS Insight: The Social Security Fairness Act of 2023 -- Background for Congress (PDF)

"The Social Security Fairness Act of 2023 (HR 82) ... [and] S 597, a companion bill ... would repeal two provisions under Social Security -- the Government Pension Offset (GPO) and the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) -- for benefits payable after December 2023.... This Insight provides summary information on the GPO and WEP, including how each provision works, who is affected, arguments for or against these provisions, and relevant legislation in the 118th Congress[.]" [IN12451 Nov. 13, 2024]  MORE >>

Internal Revenue Service [IRS]

Building Better Retirement Plans: Applying SECURE 2.0 Reforms

"Start with a comprehensive review of the current legislative landscape.... Evaluate each provision based on your unique needs, considering your industry, employee population, and retirement program goals.... Collaborate closely with stakeholders, including your recordkeeper, to ensure accurate amendments to your plan document for the selected provisions.... The retirement plan advisor should coordinate with your recordkeeper, payroll provider, and third-party administrators to ensure a smooth rollout of the updates."  MORE >>

Woodruff Sawyer

[Sponsor]

Retirement at a Crossroads: Navigating Policy in a Changing Political Landscape During a Challenging Year for Tax Legislation

Join us November 19 for an enlightening discussion on critical retirement legislative issues in the wake of the 2024 presidential election. Preston Rutledge, expert on retirement policy and former Assistant Secretary of Labor for EBSA, will share his insights.

Sponsored by WEB Network

Recent Developments in Forfeiture Cases

"To date, we count 25 forfeiture lawsuits filed in a variety of jurisdictions (11 in federal courts in California). Six decisions on motions to dismiss have been issued so far. Two motions were denied outright. One motion was granted without leave to refile. The remaining three motions were granted (including the latest in the Clorox matter discussed below), but with leave to plaintiffs to amend their complaints."  MORE >>

The Wagner Law Group

Exceptional Usefulness and Quality icon The Basics of New Comparability Plans

"New comparability plans ... allow an employer to allocate different profit-sharing contribution percentages to different groups of employees at the employer's discretion.... New comparability plans make sense for businesses that want to maximize employer contributions for older, higher-paid owners and key employees while providing a modest contribution for younger employees."  MORE >>

Belfint Lyons Shuman

Private Equity and Private-Market Funds in Managed Defined Contribution Plans (PDF)

"While the nature of private-market investments, such as private equity, are aligned with the long horizons of many participants in principle, the cash flow flexibility with which the typical DC-plan sponsor is comfortable and that of a privatemarket fund manager are not naturally aligned. Additionally, the very nature of private markets with their high fees, limited liquidity, complicated cost structure, and often opaque reporting could prove a tough hurdle for plan sponsors even with the allure of increased diversification and potentially attractive returns."  MORE >>

Morningstar

Nonprofits Adopting SECURE 2.0 Optional Provisions at High Rates

"90 percent of all nonprofit employees are eligible to participate in plans, a survey high, and likely expanded due to SECURE Act provisions allowing long-term part-time employees to participate.... [N]early 70 percent of respondents added the optional provision in SECURE 2.0 to allow for a distribution in the event of a natural disaster, 60 percent added the provision for terminal illness, and 48.4 percent adopted the $1,000 emergency withdrawal provision."  MORE >>

Plan Sponsor Council of America [PSCA]

[Opinion]

Annuities, Commensurate Return, and the Fiduciary Duty to Disclose

"[T]he overwhelming majority of brokers and plan sponsors have no understanding of the methodology required to properly assess the prudence of annuities. More often than not, plan sponsors hear the mantra 'guaranteed income for life' and they believe any annuity is prudent."  MORE >>

The Prudent Investment Adviser Rules

Benefits in General

[Official Guidance]

IRS Disaster Relief Notice NM-2024-07, for Victims of Severe Storms and Flooding in Chaves County, New Mexico

"The [IRS] announced today tax relief for individuals and businesses located in Chaves County, New Mexico affected by severe storms and flooding that began on Oct. 19, 2024. These taxpayers now have until May 1, 2025, to file various federal individual and business tax returns and make tax payments.... [I]ndividuals and households that reside or have a business located in Chaves County, New Mexico qualify for tax relief."  MORE >>

Internal Revenue Service [IRS]

Executive Compensation and Nonqualified Plans

[Guidance Overview]

IRS Introduces Official Section 83(b) Election Form

"On November 7, 2024, the IRS introduced Form 15620, a new standardized form for taxpayers opting to make a Section 83(b) election. Previously, taxpayers needed to send a letter to the IRS with the required information to make the Section 83(b) election effective."  MORE >>

Stinson

Employee Benefits Jobs

View job as Head of Transition Services - Operations (Plan Conversions/Deconversions) for Ascensus

Head of Transition Services - Operations (Plan Conversions/Deconversions)

Ascensus

Remote / MA / PA / Hybrid

View job as Head of Transition Services - Operations (Plan Conversions/Deconversions) for Ascensus
View job as On-Boarding Specialist for M2B Retirement Consulting LLC

On-Boarding Specialist

M2B Retirement Consulting LLC

Remote / PA

View job as On-Boarding Specialist for M2B Retirement Consulting LLC
View job as Benefits Administrator for Camillo Companies

Benefits Administrator

Camillo Companies

Houston TX / Hybrid

View job as Benefits Administrator for Camillo Companies

Selected New Discussions

401(k) Loan: Source for Determining Prime Interest Rate

"Which Federal website are other TPA's using to see what the current 'prime' interest rate is when processing participant loans when the document says the interest rate to be used is 'prime plus ___%'? Moody's, Wall Street and Bloomberg are all showing different prime rates.... Are TPA's just trusting the pre-populated rate that comes through from the recordkeeper instead of checking on it themselves?"

BenefitsLink Message Boards

ERISA 403(b) Paired with Non-ERISA 403(b)

"Client is a 501(c)(3) and I'm looking at what I was told was a pretty simple 403(b) (plan 001). Nothing exceptional stands out in the plan document, participants get a 3% non-elective on top of a 50% match up to 4% of comp. The plan files a Form 5500 every year. After speaking to the accountant, what happens in practice is throwing me off a bit.

  • Elective deferrals in excess of 4% of comp are actually deposited to a second 403(b) plan (lets call it plan 002). I haven't seen a plan document for this plan, and no 5500s have been filed. It sounds like its a deferral only non-ERISA 403(b).
  • Both plans are with the same provider
  • Plan 001 does not mention anything about deferrals in excess of 4% of comp being funded to a different plan.

This doesn't seem right to me, I would expect that plan 001 would have to spell out that it will only accept elective deferrals up to 4%. Am I missing something? What is the point of splitting elective deferrals into two plans?"

BenefitsLink Message Boards

Subsequent Eligibility Computation Periods

"Is it possible for a Plan to use different subsequent eligibility computation periods for different money sources? For example, a Plan would like to do 1 year of service, with 1,000 hours, for the deferrals and safe harbor match, but do 2 years of service with 1,000 hours for profit sharing. They would like to 'switch to plan year' to calculate subsequent eligibility computation periods for deferrals and safe harbor match, but use anniversary of hire to calculate subsequent eligibility computation periods for profit sharing. Is this possible? What additional testing would the Plan be subject to?"

BenefitsLink Message Boards

Press Releases

Katy Johnson named next Council president, succeeding longtime leader James Klein

American Benefits Council

Bluespine Raises $7.2 Million in Seed Funding to Help Self-Insured Employers Tackle Medical Overbilling

Bluespine

Webcasts and Conferences
(Retirement Plans / Executive Compensation)

DC Plan Sponsors and Forfeiture Lawsuits: What You Need to Know

RECORDED

NEPC

Washington Update

December 11, 2024 WEBINAR

National Association of Plan Advisors [NAPA]

Last Issue's Most Popular Items

Prepare for Upcoming Changes to Retirement Plans for 2025

The Wagner Law Group

Text of IRS Notice 703: Worksheet to Determine Whether Your Social Security Benefits May Be Taxable (PDF)

Internal Revenue Service [IRS]

SECURE 2.0 in 2025: Big Plan Design Changes

PenChecks

Unsubscribe  |   Change Email Address

Search Past Issues   |   Privacy Policy

Submit an Article   |   Contact Us   |   Advertise Here

Copyright 2024 BenefitsLink.com, Inc. All materials contained in this newsletter are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of BenefitsLink.com, Inc., or in the case of third party materials, the owner of those materials. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notices from copies of the content.

BenefitsLink® Retirement Plans Newsletter, ISSN no. 1536-9587.

Links to web sites other than BenefitsLink.com and EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com are offered as a service to our readers. We are not involved in their production and are not responsible for their content.