|
|
|
4 New Job Opportunities
|
| |
|
[Guidance Overview]
IRS FAQs: Retirement Plan and IRA Required Minimum Distributions
"If you reach age 73 in 2024: [1] Your first RMD is due by April 1, 2025, based on your account balance on December 31, 2023, and [2] Your second RMD is due by December 31, 2025, based on your account balance on December 31, 2024. For defined
contribution plan participants or IRA owners who die after December 31, 2019 ... the entire balance of the deceased participant's account must be distributed within ten years. There's an exception for a surviving spouse, a child who has not reached the age of majority, a disabled or chronically ill person, or a person not more than ten years younger than the employee or IRA account owner." [Updated Dec. 10,
2024] MORE >>
Internal Revenue Service [IRS]
|
|
[Sponsor]
Need ASPPA or NIPA CE Credits by December 31st?
Get your CE Credits now from ERISA expert John Griffin J.D., LL.M. Current Events, Fundamentals Series, Long-term Part-time Employees – Where do We Stand? Access the full ASC Recorded CE Webcast Library here.
|
|

|
|
[Guidance Overview]
IRS RMD Comparison Chart (IRAs vs. Defined Contribution Plans)
"This chart highlights some of the basic RMD rules as applied to IRAs and defined contribution plans (e.g., 401(k), profit-sharing, and 403(b) plans)." [Updated Dec. 10, 2024] MORE >>
Internal Revenue Service [IRS]
|
|
[Guidance Overview]
Take the 'Hard' Out of Hardship Distributions with a Substantiation Policy (PDF)
"[As] Congress and the [IRS] (IRS) continue to change the substantiation requirements for these distribution options, plan sponsors are left trying to balance the desire to prevent excess leakage from a plan against wanting to avoid creating unnecessary burdens to participants
experiencing a financial crisis. This article will review the current requirements for hardship distributions and suggest guidelines for a hardship distribution policy." MORE >>
International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans [IFEBP]
|
|
DOL Brief Supports Retirees’ Contention that QJSA Benefits Erroneously Calculated
"The retirees argue that the QJSA benefits were based on outdated mortality assumptions, which violated ERISA's actuarial equivalence requirement and resulted in lower benefit payments than the plaintiffs otherwise would have received.... The DOL's stance includes the
observation that the district court considered it 'irrelevant' that the Treasury regulation on QJSA benefits -- which expressly requires the use of reasonable assumptions for QJSA conversions -- explaining that the regulation is 'not enforceable under ERISA.' " [Drummond v. Southern Company Services, Inc., No. 22-0174 (N.D. Ga. Jul. 30, 2024; on appeal to 11th Cir. No. 24-12773, DOL amicus brief filed Dec. 4, 2024)] MORE >>
American Retirement Association [ARA]
|
|
Building a Better Retirement 2024 (PDF)
18 pages. "When asked about the top ways they could improve employees' retirements, most employers first went with the familiar -- focusing on accumulation by increasing their match. A close second demonstrates the evolution in their thinking: Offering income guaranteed
for life.... 85% of plan sponsors say employees need more guaranteed income than Social Security will provide.... 63% of plan sponsors say they're unable to articulate the value and importance of annuities." MORE >>
TIAA
|
|
Does Having the 'Right' Capital Market Assumptions Matter?
"[W]hile 'perfect' [capital market assumptions (CMAs)] may offer accurate predictions about general market conditions, they will still fall short of telling a client how much they can spend. Market fluctuations, sequence of returns, and personal spending behaviors all
create unpredictable variations that CMAs cannot fully capture. However, by proactively monitoring and adjusting portfolio spending, advisors and clients can take advantage of the high points, guard against the lows, and, overall, ensure greater peace of mind!" MORE >>
Nerd's Eye View
|
|
[Opinion]
The Social Security Fairness Act Is a Bad Idea
"Since their enactment in 1983, the WEP and GPO have infuriated state and local employees, who feel they are unfairly being denied benefits. In fact, these provisions are a legitimate -- if imperfect -- effort to solve an equity issue that arises because
25-30 percent of state and local workers are not covered by Social Security." MORE >>
Alicia Munnell, via Center for Retirement Research [CRR] at Boston College
|
Benefits in General |
|
[Opinion]
Employment and Employee Benefits Areas to Watch in Trump’s Second Term
"The incoming Trump administration will likely pull back from defending Biden-era rules from court challenges, including the Federal Trade Commission's recent ban of noncompetes, the DOL's updated definition of an investment advice fiduciary under ERISA and a DOL rule
permitting ERISA fiduciaries to consider ESG issues when making investment decisions. Changes in regulation at the federal level could lead to an increase in legislative and judicial activity at the state level ... The new administration, like Trump's previous administration, will likely target the [ACA] and other healthcare-related policies, leading to significant changes ahead in healthcare coverage
requirements." MORE >>
Debevoise & Plimpton LLP
|
Executive Compensation and Nonqualified Plans |
|
Year-End 2024: Post-Election Tax and Financial Planning
"The longer-term outlook for the tax laws and the stock market is a key factor at year-end 2024 for employee stock options, restricted stock units (RSUs), employee stock purchase plans (ESPPs), and related holdings of company shares." MORE >>
myStockOptions.com
|
|
Employee Benefits Jobs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected New Discussions |
|
Roth Contributions
"We have a 01(k) plan which was effective in 2021. Accountant wants to add Roth contributions and recharacterize all prior contributions as Roth. Need some cites, seems crazy."
BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
|
Death Benefit - Missouri
"Death distributions needed from standard 401(k) and DB (PBGC covered) small employer retirement plans. Everyone is in Missouri. No named beneficiaries, so the default plan document beneficiaries apply. In this case the default beneficiary in the plan document is the estate.
Period. Decedent did not have a will, based on court filings total value of assets likely is less than $40,000 (including the retirement plans) Estate/Probate was not opened within one year, and in lieu of doing the Small Estate Probate (Which is still allowed after one year), the heirs did file and receive a Decree/Determination of Heirship. Which does happen to have an estate number on it, so the court can track it. - Attorney
for the heirs wants the plans to pay directly to the heirs.
- The plans are insisting on a TIN so the death benefits can be paid to an estate. Which I agree with.
The confluence of federal laws for the plan, the fact that there IS a beneficiary, so the
determination of heirs doesn't really matter for the plans, etc, are confounding for the heirs' attorney. Other than just telling the plans to hold firm, any other ideas? information they can send them? Any Missouri estate attorneys want to chime in or want me to send their contact info to the heirs' attorney?"
BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
|
|
Press Releases |
|
Please Welcome Eric Smith to Kushner & Company's Retirement Team
Kushner & Company
|
|
|
Webcasts and Conferences (Retirement Plans / Executive Compensation) |
|
Employee Benefit Plans: Lessons and Strategies for Success
RECORDED
Moss Adams
|
|
|
Last Issue's Most Popular Items |
|
SECURE 2.0 Permits Employer Roth Contributions
Ferenczy Benefits Law Center
|
|
SECURE 3.0? What's on the Horizon for Retirement Policy as President Trump Takes Office, Again
BenefitsPro; free registration required
|
|
What Could 2025 Tax Talks Mean for 401(k)s?
American Retirement Association [ARA]
|
|
Unsubscribe |
Change Email Address
Search Past Issues |
Privacy Policy
Submit an Article |
Contact Us |
Advertise Here
Copyright 2024 BenefitsLink.com, Inc. All materials contained in this newsletter are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of BenefitsLink.com, Inc., or in the case of third party materials, the owner of those materials. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notices from copies of the content.
BenefitsLink® Retirement Plans Newsletter, ISSN no. 1536-9587.
Links to web sites other than BenefitsLink.com and EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com are offered as a service to our readers. We are not involved in their production and are not responsible for their content.
|