|
|
|
2 New Job Opportunities
|
| |
|
[Official Guidance]
Text of IRS Publiction 517: Social Security and Other Information for Members of the Clergy and Religious Workers (PDF)
17 pages; for use in preparing 2024 returns. "What's new: [1] Standard mileage rate.... [2] Earnings subject to Social Security tax.... [3] Modified adjusted gross income (AGI) limit for deduction of traditional IRA contributions.... [4] Modified AGI limit
for Roth IRA contributions increased.... [5] Earned income credit (EIC). " MORE >>
Internal Revenue Service [IRS]
|
|
[Guidance Overview]
2025 Limits on Contributions to 401(k) Plans Qualified in Puerto Rico
"Unfortunately, Hacienda did not increase vis-à-vis 2024, the maximum amounts that Puerto Rico participants can contribute to their 401(k) plan accounts through pre-tax, catch-up, or after-tax contributions. And, because the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code of 2011 does not
provide for Roth contributions, Puerto Rico participants remain ineligible to make Roth contributions to their 401(k) plan accounts." MORE >>
Carlos Gonzalez Law Office LLC
|
|
[Guidance Overview]
IRS Provides 'Super' and Roth Guidance
"Plan sponsors that choose not to allow the super catch-up contributions may want to review the language in their plan documents related to catch-up contributions. If the plan document broadly allows catch-up eligible participants to defer the maximum permitted under Internal
Revenue Code Section 414(v), the plan document may inadvertently allow super catch-up contributions, even if this is not the plan sponsor's intent." MORE >>
Eversheds Sutherland
|
|
[Guidance Overview]
Catching-Up on Catch-Up Contribution Changes
"The proposed regulations make it clear that a participant is subject to the Roth Catch-Up Requirement only if he or she has FICA wages for the preceding calendar year in excess of $145,000. In other words, eligible participants working for a partnership who only have
self-employment income would not be subject to the Roth Catch-Up Requirement.... [T]he term 'employer' refers only to the individual's common law employer who is participating under the plan. In other words, you do not aggregate wages paid by all employers across the controlled group of companies, even if there are multiple related or unrelated employers participating under the plan." MORE >>
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
|
|
[Guidance Overview]
DOL Updates Voluntary Fiduciary Correction Program
"The first new feature is for the failure to timely remit participant contributions and loan repayments -- the most frequently used correction under VFCP.... The second new self-correction feature under VFCP involves certain eligible inadvertent failures related to
participant loans ... Other notable modifications ... include additional correction options: For prohibited loan transactions and prohibited purchase and sale transactions involving plans; For sale and leaseback transactions to affiliates of the plan sponsor; and Permitting service providers to submit a bulk application to address violations involving multiple plans." MORE >>
The Wagner Law Group
|
|
Cornell Univ. to SCOTUS: Upholding Second Circuit Decision Would Invite Lawsuits Over the Mere Hiring of Outside Vendors (PDF)
"In his questioning, Justice Brett Kavanaugh commented that the plaintiff's argument 'does seem to close its eyes to the reality of what's going on,' noting that many excessive-fee cases are led against major retirement plans.... Other Supreme Court
justices ... discussed potential guardrails that could be put in place to prevent the influx of 'bare bones' lawsuits that don't allege legitimate wrongdoing, while also ensuring that plan participants aren't inhibited by their 'asymmetry' from their plan's information." [Cunningham v. Cornell Univ., No. 21-0088 (2d Cir. Nov. 14, 2023; cert. pet. granted No. 23-1007 Oct. 3, 2024; oral arg. Jan. 22, 2025, transcript and audio)] MORE >>
Holland & Knight
|
|
Texas District Court's Decision in 401(k) Case Has Wide-Ranging Implications for Plan Fiduciaries
"Although the case is a milestone and first of its kind in the ongoing political debate over ESG initiatives in retirement plan investments, plan sponsors and fiduciaries should take note of several other issues raised by the case that may significantly change the landscape for
ERISA fiduciaries." [Spence v. Am. Airlines, Inc., No. 23-0552 (N.D. Tex. Jan. 10, 2025)] MORE >>
Jackson Walker
|
|
Fourth Circuit Approves Award of Estimated Delinquent Contributions
"Multiemployer plan trustees have a fiduciary obligation to collect the contributions owed to the plans they oversee, and the Fourth Circuit's decision is a reminder that an employer's failure to maintain accurate records is not likely to deter plans from enforcing those
obligations. In fact, such a failure may prevent the employer from setting forth the facts necessary to rebut determinations by the plan's auditor and expose the employer to interest, liquidated damages, and attorneys' fees and costs incurred by the plan to collect any delinquent contributions.' [Sheet Metal Workers" Health & Welfare Fund of N. Carolina v. Stromberg Metal Works, Inc., No. 21-2134 (4th Cir. Oct. 3, 2024)] MORE >>
Proskauer
|
|
Switching Your 401(k) Plan's Service Providers: A Guide for a Smooth Transition
"[M]ake sure that the terms outlined in the prospective provider's contract align with your expectations and include clear termination clauses for your current provider.... When changing the service provider that sponsors your plan document, pay close attention to the plan
provisions in the new document.... It is essential to thoroughly analyze the fees related to services offered by previous and current service providers ... Plan sponsors must prioritize the comprehensive and precise transfer of participant data[.]" MORE >>
EisnerAmper
|
|
House Republicans Again Ask DOL for Information on Common Interest Agreements
"Rep. Tim Walberg (R-MI), ... chairman of the Education and Workforce Committee, on Jan. 23 sent a letter to DOL
Inspector General Larry Turner renewing the Committee's request that the [OIG] investigate [EBSA] for what he described as 'serious abuses of authority following reports that it shared confidential information with a plaintiff's attorney for use against employee benefits plan fiduciaries.' " MORE >>
Plan Sponsor Council of America [PSCA]
|
|
[Opinion]
Supreme Court Hears ERISA Burden of Proof Case
"One gets the sense that the justices have more faith in the current system of review and its ability to weed out insubstantial arguments than one might glean from the sheer volume of suits in recent months. And on that basis, one might well conclude that they would be inclined
to see the dismissal of the suit by the Second Circuit as being premature. If so, that might well set aside the 'plausible' threshold adopted by a number of the federal court districts -- and that would likely encourage more litigation." [Cunningham v. Cornell Univ.,
No. 21-0088 (2d Cir. Nov. 14, 2023; cert. pet. granted No. 23-1007 Oct. 3, 2024; oral arg. Jan. 22, 2025, transcript and audio)] MORE >>
American Retirement Association [ARA]
|
|
[Opinion]
Debate: Does ESG Investing Breach Plan Sponsors' Duty of Loyalty?
"[ALM] asked two professors ... with opposing political viewpoints to share their opinions about the Texas court’s finding that a retirement plan’s sponsors violated their duty of loyalty by allowing firms with ESG objectives to manage the plan’s
funds." MORE >>
ThinkAdvisor
|
Benefits in General |
|
Fiduciary Committees as Parties to a Vendor Contract
"Although the plan and/or the company may also be named as parties in this agreement (as reflecting their contractual responsibilities), identifying the committee as the responsible party for specific provisions, such as those relating to plan administration, monitoring, and
compliance requirements, can help align the contract with the governance structure that is in place and may help prevent the company or individuals from being treated as fiduciaries to the plan." MORE >>
Morgan Lewis
|
|
Creative Ways to Use AI for Member Communications
"Generative AI, with its vast capabilities, offers an exciting frontier for transforming how we communicate complex benefits information. Understanding and applying these cutting-edge tools can significantly enhance the quality and efficiency of member communications. Integrating
Generative AI into communications strategies not only modernizes the approach to communications but also helps meet members’ evolving needs and expectations." MORE >>
Segal
|
Executive Compensation and Nonqualified Plans |
|
[Guidance Overview]
IRS Proposes New 162(m) Regulations
"The proposed regulations define 'employee' using Section 3401(c), which includes both common-law employees and corporate officers.... The determination of which employees are among the five highest-compensated tracks tax principles, rather than SEC
principles ... The proposed rules also apply the current Section 162(m) affiliated group rules to determinations of the five highest-compensated employees for each taxable year." MORE >>
Debevoise & Plimpton LLP
|
|
Employee Benefits Jobs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected New Discussions |
|
Changing ESOP Distribution Policy
"Our ESOP lays out the statutory requirements for distributions. Our Distribution Policy has the details. Can we literally just change anything in the Distribution Policy as long as we stay within the statutory requirements? For example, the ESOP says we can require participant
to wait until the plan year that is five years after the year of employment termination. The Distribution Policy says we will distribute small accounts (say, $10,000 or less) in the year following separation. Can we change the Distribution Policy to say all accounts (no matter what size) have to wait five years? This still complies with the statutory requirements and is consistent with the ESOP language, but is it a problem that we are
treating similar employees differently (i.e. small account balance participants have very different treatment before and after the Distribution Policy change)?"
BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
|
2024 1099-R Accuracy for Participant with Loan Default vs. Offset
"A plan participant terminated employment in June 2024 with an outstanding loan. The plan permits immediate distributions upon termination. The participant received a distribution in June 2024. The loan was not offset against with the distribution and
subsequently defaulted between September 30th and October 1st, 2024.... As the participant was not rehired, the loan accrued interest from the distribution date until the default date. "The participant's 2024 1099-R includes interest accrued on the defaulted
loan, even though the loan was not offset against the distribution in June. " "Should the participant request a correction to their 2024 1099-R before filing their taxes? Is the 1099-R likely to overstate the taxable distribution due to the inclusion of interest accrued
between the distribution date and default date? ... Is it reasonable to expect the plan sponsor to actively seek information about the participant's loan repayment intentions at the time of distribution to avoid potential interest accrual? Given the plan's offset provision, why wasn't the loan offset at the time of the distribution?"
BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
|
Employer Contributions as Roth
"IRS Notice 2024-2 provides some guidance on this. Specifically, I want to see if you disagree with my reading of Q&A L-2: - Q. L-2: If an employee designates a matching contribution or nonelective contribution as a Roth contribution, for which taxable year
is that designated Roth matching contribution or designated Roth nonelective contribution includible in the individual's gross income?
- A. L-2: A designated Roth matching contribution or designated Roth nonelective contribution is includible in an individual's gross income for the taxable year in which the contribution is allocated to the individual's account. The preceding sentence applies even if the designated Roth
matching contribution or designated Roth nonelective contribution is deemed to have been made on the last day of the prior taxable year of the employer under section 404(a)(6) of the Code. It seems clear to me that the meaning of this is that 'allocated' in this context means 'contributed.'
So if in July of 2025, a profit sharing contribution is made on a Roth basis, even though it is 'allocated' for 415 purposes to the 2024 plan year, it is nevertheless TAXABLE to the employee in 2025. Any agreement/disagreement/other thoughts?"
BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
|
|
Press Releases |
|
IRI and Cannex Develop Breakthrough Solution to Simplify Annuity Modeling
Insured Retirement Institute [IRI]
|
|
Admin316 Unveils Enhanced Fiduciary Services for Modern Retirement Plan Management
Read more: https://www.digitaljournal.com/pr/news/revupmarketer/admin316-unveils-enhanced-fiduciary-services-1356767323.html#ixzz8yGzILGpV
Admin316
|
|
|
Webcasts and Conferences (Retirement Plans / Executive Compensation) |
|
Navigating Section 409A Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Taxes and Audits: Challenges for Employers and Employees
February 11, 2025 WEBINAR
Strafford
|
|
Navigating the Complexities of Retirement Plan Termination
March 6, 2025 WEBINAR
National Association of Plan Advisors [NAPA]
|
|
|
Last Issue's Most Popular Items |
|
Text of Hacienda Internal Revenue Circular Letter No. 25-01: Limits Applicable for the Year 2025 to Puerto Rico Qualified Retirement Plans
Puerto Rico Departamento De Hacienda
|
|
Transcript of Oral Argument Before U.S. Supreme Court: Cunningham v. Cornell University (PDF)
Supreme Court of the United States
|
|
DOL Relaxes Certain Self-Correction Rules for Tax-Qualified Retirement Plans
Nelson Mullins
|
|
Unsubscribe |
Change Email Address
Search Past Issues |
Privacy Policy
Submit an Article |
Contact Us |
Advertise Here
Copyright 2025 BenefitsLink.com, Inc. All materials contained in this newsletter are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of BenefitsLink.com, Inc., or in the case of third party materials, the owner of those materials. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notices from copies of the content.
BenefitsLink® Retirement Plans Newsletter, ISSN no. 1536-9587.
Links to web sites other than BenefitsLink.com and EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com are offered as a service to our readers. We are not involved in their production and are not responsible for their content.
|