Get This Daily Newsletter by Email

BenefitsLink.com logo
EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com logo

Trusted Since 1995

Retirement Plans Newsletter

February 17, 2025

4 New Job Opportunities 4 New Job Opportunities

 

District Court Reaffirms Biden Era ESG Rule

"The Red State coalition asked the court to reconsider its earlier decision to affirm the rule after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the Chevron doctrine in the case of Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo in June.... [The judge wrote] that 'Plaintiffs would have this Court vacate the 2022 rule to 'restore the protections of the 2020 rules.' ... However, the 2020 Rule has a tiebreaker provision that would also violate Plaintiffs' interpretation of ERISA. But ERISA's text does not invalidate the tiebreaker provision of the 2020 Rule or the 2022 Rule.' " [Utah v. Micone, No. 23-0016 (N.D. tex. Feb. 14, 2025]  MORE >>

American Retirement Association [ARA]

The Part-Time Participant

"Addressing the unique retirement planning needs of part-time employees requires understanding their distinct challenges and fostering a sense of inclusivity alongside their full-time counterparts. By carefully considering onboarding, education, communication efforts and plan design with respect to part-time workers' needs, sponsors can create a more cohesive workforce and strengthen a culture of inclusivity in the workplace."  MORE >>

RPAG

Increasing 401(k) Balances Can Bring Increased Risk

"Rising 401(k) balances can lead to financial overconfidence for some participants, tempting them to view their retirement account as a quick fix during economic challenges instead of exploring alternative strategies for managing emergency cash flow. Here are ways employers can help."  MORE >>

FiduciaryAdvisors LLC

Calculating Impact of WEP and GPO Repeal on Individual Social Security Benefits

"[G]iven that the reduction can amount to hundreds or even thousands of dollars per month, having a reliable estimate of the impact of WEP and GPO's repeal can help advisors proactively plan for the impact the new law will have on their clients' retirement strategies. While there's still uncertainty about the actual timing of the law's implementation, advisors can still add value today by helping clients understand how the repeal will shape their financial future!"  MORE >>

Nerd's Eye View

Annuity Purchase Update, February 2025

"Surging pension funding status this past month signals an opportunity for frozen Pension Plan Sponsors to seize de-risking advantages. Both the duration 7 and duration 15 annuity purchase interest rates have remained fairly stable this past month, recording a 5 basis points increase for both durations. As PBGC costs increased again in 2025, implementing a retiree-carve-out, particularly for retirees with small benefits, can be a highly effective strategy for reducing PBGC premiums, resulting in substantial long-term cost savings."  MORE >>

October Three Consulting

Expansion of Auto Enrollment in Hawaii Progresses in Legislature

"The reach of automatic enrollment through the Hawaii Retirement Savings Program is a few steps closer to expanding. Legislation that would accomplish that has received a nod from several committees."  MORE >>

American Retirement Association [ARA]

The Effect of U.S. COVID-19 Excess Mortality on Social Security Outlays

"This study aimed to estimate the net effects of pandemic-induced excess deaths on OASDI liabilities, utilizing dynamic microsimulation models, and examined how these effects vary across different socioeconomic and racial-ethnic groups.... The pandemic resulted in approximately 1.7 million excess deaths among individuals aged 25 and older between 2020 and 2023. These premature deaths reduced future retirement payments, which increased the Social Security fund by $294 billion. However, this gain was offset by reductions in future payroll tax flows ($58 billion) and increased payments to surviving spouses and children ($32 billion), resulting in a net impact of $205 billion."  MORE >>

National Bureau of Economic Research [NBER]; purchase may be required for full document

[Opinion]

Social Security Financing: When You’re in a Hole, Stop Digging, Part 2

"[E]ven if system changes satisfy the requirements for 'sustainable solvency', would this fix the system for any specific period of time (i.e., 75 years or longer)? Once again, the answer unfortunately is also no because the sustainable solvency metric is also a snapshot metric ... whose accuracy is dependent on the accuracy of the next 75 years of Trustees assumptions. Without enactment of some type of algorithm (guardrails) to maintain a 100% Funded Status over time, there will be no true fix for the system."  MORE >>

Ken Steiner, FSA Retired

[Opinion]

San Diego's Extreme Pension Costs Are Forcing Difficult Budget Choices

"San Diego's fiscal conundrum was largely addressed by a voter-approved pension reform that was later undone by public worker unions through the courts.... This reversal carries significant financial consequences for taxpayers and the city's budget. Incorporating affected employees into the legacy pension system is expected to cost San Diego $142 million, most of which became debt, and raised the city's required yearly pension contributions for 2025 by $48 million."  MORE >>

Reason Foundation

Benefits in General

[Guidance Overview]

Recently Issued Regulations That Will Take Effect in 2025 and 2026

"Prior to the end of the Biden administration, a number of proposed and final regulations were issued that impact retirement and welfare benefit plans. The final regulations are effective in 2025, and the proposed regulations, if finalized, would be effective in 2026.... [1] New relief on ACA employer mandate penalties.... [2] IRS anticipates a delay in applicability date for future SECURE 2.0 required minimum distribution regulations.... [3] IRS proposes regulations on SECURE 2.0 Act catch-up provisions."  MORE >>

Baker Donelson

Employee Benefits Jobs

View job as Plan Compliance Representative - Defined Contribution Specialist for Navia

Plan Compliance Representative - Defined Contribution Specialist

Navia

Remote / Fresno CA

View job as Plan Compliance Representative - Defined Contribution Specialist for Navia
View job as Employee Benefits Attorney for Kaufman & Canoles

Employee Benefits Attorney

Kaufman & Canoles

Richmond VA / Norfolk VA / Virginia Beach VA / Williamsburg VA / Newport News VA / Raleigh NC

View job as Employee Benefits Attorney for Kaufman & Canoles
View job as Director of Employee Benefits & Pensions Department for International Union, UAW

Director of Employee Benefits & Pensions Department

International Union, UAW

Detroit MI

View job as Director of Employee Benefits & Pensions Department for International Union, UAW
View job as Plan Compliance Representative - Defined Contribution Specialist for Navia

Plan Compliance Representative - Defined Contribution Specialist

Navia

Remote / Wilmington OH

View job as Plan Compliance Representative - Defined Contribution Specialist for Navia

Selected New Discussions

After-Tax Contributions Prior to 1986

"After-tax employee contributions in this DB plan stopped in 1969, well before the 1986 changes to IRC 72(d). The 1986 law eliminated the 3 year basis recovery rule for pensions starting after 1986 enactment. I have heard, but cannot find, a rule that employee contributions prior to 1986 will still have the benefit of the 3 year rule, even if the pension starts after 1986. Does anyone have that reference? Do these pre-1986 after-tax contributions still have the benefit of the 3 year basis recovery rule if the pension starts AFTER 1986?"

BenefitsLink Message Boards

Compliance Testing Flow Chart

"I'm (attempting) to create a kind of decision tree / flowchart to easily figure out what tests need to be run on a given plan. That said, it's quite nuanced and I'm by no means an expert. I've added a picture of my progress so far. My company works exclusively with DC plans, over half of which are safe harbor. This is my first year doing testing so I very well could be mistaken about some things. Generally I've had my boss looking over things with me and helping me with what plans need what tests on a kind of case-by-case basis, but I'd love to just have a nice algorithmic way to figure it out. Any thoughts? Things I have wrong or need to add?"

BenefitsLink Message Boards

Press Releases

ASC Partners with PensionPro to Exponentially Enhance Efficiencies for TPAs

ASC

Strongpoint Partners Announces Partnership with Actuaries Unlimited

Strongpoint Partners

MultiPlan Enters New Era and Unveils New Brand, Claritev, Reflecting Company’s Transformation and Mission to Support the Healthcare Continuum

Claritev

Webcasts and Conferences
(Retirement Plans / Executive Compensation)

IRA Reporting Requirements

March 25, 2025 WEBINAR

Ascensus

Last Issue's Most Popular Items

No Super Catch-Up Contributions When You're Sixty-Four

Haynes and Boone, LLP

Avoiding the Snags of Long-Term, Part-Time Rules

401(k) Specialist

District Court Dismisses HP 401(k) Forfeiture Suit with Prejudice

Holland & Knight

Unsubscribe  |   Change Email Address

Search Past Issues   |   Privacy Policy

Submit an Article   |   Contact Us   |   Advertise Here

Copyright 2025 BenefitsLink.com, Inc. All materials contained in this newsletter are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of BenefitsLink.com, Inc., or in the case of third party materials, the owner of those materials. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notices from copies of the content.

BenefitsLink® Retirement Plans Newsletter, ISSN no. 1536-9587.

Links to web sites other than BenefitsLink.com and EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com are offered as a service to our readers. We are not involved in their production and are not responsible for their content.