Get This Daily Newsletter by Email

Retirement Plans Newsletter

April 17, 2025

BenefitsLink.com logo
EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com logo

💼  New Job Opportunity Today

 

[Official Guidance]

PBGC Interest Rate Updates, March, 2025

PBGC has updated the ERISA 4044 Yield Curves, as well as the interest rates used for valuing vested benefits for variable rate premium purposes.  MORE >>

Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation [PBGC]

[Official Guidance]

Text of FRTIB Proposed Regs: Procedures for Applying Payments to Principal and Interest upon Loan Reamortization

"The Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board (FRTIB) proposes to amend a loan reamorization rule that requires payment of all accrued interest prior to allowing payments on the principal and current interest. Under the proposed rule, the Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) record keeper would combine the accrued interest with the outstanding principal when reamortizing a loan."  MORE >>

Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board [FRTIB]

Supreme Court Defines Pleading Standard for ERISA Prohibited Transaction Claims (PDF)

21 pages. "To state a claim under Section 1106(a)(1)(C), a plaintiff need only plausibly allege the elements contained in that provision itself, without addressing potential Section 1108 exemptions.... The exemptions in Section 1108 do not impose additional pleading requirements for Section 1106(a)(1) claims.... [T]he Section 1108 exemptions are structured as affirmative defenses that must be pleaded and proved by defendants who seek to benefit from them.... [R]espondents' practical concerns about meritless litigation cannot overcome the statutory text and structure." [Cunningham v. Cornell, No. 23-1007 (S.Ct. Apr. 17, 2025)]  MORE >>

Supreme Court of the United States

Cornell Workers Score SCOTUS Revival of Retirement Plan Suit

"Fiduciaries defending their retirement plans in court are the ones that must plead and prove that they qualify for a statutory exemption that would make an otherwise prohibited transaction permissible ... Plaintiffs challenging their retirement plans under [ERISA]'s prohibited transaction rules don't have to include details in their complaints showing that these statutory exemptions don't apply to block their cases, according to the opinion.... In a concurring opinion, [three justices said] this 'straightforward application' of the text is likely to cause 'untoward practical results,' because it will allow lawsuits to advance to discovery based on allegations of common, innocent conduct, he said." [Cunningham v. Cornell Univ., No. 23-1007 (S.Ct. Apr. 17, 2025)]   MORE >>

Bloomberg Tax

A Closer Look at Emergency Distribution Options Under SECURE 2.0

"Thanks to the SECURE 2.0 Act, an expanded array of distributions from a retirement account is now more readily available. There are rules for their application, but making them available is up to the discretion of a plan sponsor."  MORE >>

American Retirement Association [ARA]

PEPs Are a Win for Many Employers and Advisors

"83% of PEP employers are satisfied with the experience ... Four out of five PEP employers said they considered multiple providers before joining a PEP.... 58% of employers with a PEP said they considered the plan because their advisor or consultant recommended it."  MORE >>

The Standard

The QPAM Exemption: Key Takeaways for Fund Managers with Benefit Plan Investors

"What is the QPAM Exemption? ... Why is it important to qualify as a QPAM? ... Are all prohibited transactions exempt under the QPAM Exemption? ... Who may qualify as a QPAM? ... What else is required to maintain status as a QPAM? ... We are an RIA seeking to qualify as a QPAM. What's next?"  MORE >>

Winstead Investment Management

The Hidden Cost of Leaving Your 401k Behind

"New analysis from PensionBee reveals how discreet non-employee fees on retirement accounts can snowball into nearly $18,000 in lost funds over time.... The analysis looked at a typical worker who: [1] Works for 33 years, changing jobs every three years (12 employers total); [2] Has a 5% investment return, minus average 401(k) fees (net return: 4.15%); [3] Leaves behind a 401(k) with a $4.55 monthly account maintenance fee every time they switch jobs."  MORE >>

PensionBee, via BusinessWire

[Opinion]

Does ERISA Work?

"In terms of protecting participants ... it appears that ERISA is working, at least for participants in plans that are subject to it. Moving forward, important questions arise from these incidents, including whether ERISA should be expanded to cover more types of plans, whether the protections provided by ERISA are too costly, and what role state laws should or could play."  MORE >>

Verrill Dana LLP

Employee Benefits Jobs

💼

National Account Sales Director

FuturePlan, by Ascensus

Remote

View job as National Account Sales Director for FuturePlan, by Ascensus

Selected New Discussions

Mandatory Auto Enrollment Effective Date

"If a plan was adopted and effective 1/1/2023, but hires the 11th employee on 4/1/2025, is the effective date when the plan has to add MAE 1/1/2027?"

BenefitsLink Message Boards

Searching for 'Lost' Participants

"Is there a company that everyone uses to help locate terminated participants who we can't locate? The company we used to use seems to no longer be operating, so we needed a new one."

BenefitsLink Message Boards

If a Search for a Missing Participant Finds a New Address, What Do You Do with It?

"If a search result includes what the search suggests now is a likely current address (postal or email, or even both) for the individual, what does a plan administrator or its service provider do with that information? (Assume an account not yet nearing a Section 401(a)(9) required beginning date and not subject to a small-balance involuntary distribution.) Whether the found address is postal or email, an administrator might be reluctant to send a written communication there, fearing that a person other than the participant might receive the communication.... Could efforts to find an inoperable-address participant help an impostor steal the participant's account? Are there ways of communicating to the found address without revealing anything about the name or identity of the retirement plan? Or might the communication omit the participant's name? If so, would either such a communication, if it reaches the participant, be effective in getting a response from the participant? What steps would a plan's administrator use to guard against a theft of an inoperable-address participant's account?"

BenefitsLink Message Boards

Press Releases

Payroll Integrations and UKG Partner to Automate Payroll and Benefits Administration

Payroll Integrations

OneDigital Welcomes BoliColi

OneDigital

Last Issue's Most Popular Items

Draft of 2025 Instructions for IRS Forms 1099-R and 5498: Distributions from Pensions, Annuities, Retirement or Profit-Sharing Plans, IRAs, Insurance Contracts, Etc. (PDF)

Internal Revenue Service [IRS]

Annual Benchmarking Report: Latest Trends in 401(k) Plan Design and Participant Behavior (PDF)

T. Rowe Price

Protecting Social Security: The Case Against Extending the Full Retirement Age

Edward Lane, via SSRN

Unsubscribe  |   Change Email Address

Search Past Issues   |   Privacy Policy

Submit an Article   |   Contact Us   |   Advertise Here

Copyright 2025 BenefitsLink.com, Inc. All materials contained in this newsletter are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of BenefitsLink.com, Inc., or in the case of third party materials, the owner of those materials. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notices from copies of the content.

BenefitsLink® Retirement Plans Newsletter, ISSN no. 1536-9587.

Links to web sites other than BenefitsLink.com and EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com are offered as a service to our readers. We are not involved in their production and are not responsible for their content.