|
Retirement Plans Newsletter
April 21, 2025
|
|
|
|
💼 2 New Job Opportunities
|
| |
|
Supreme Court Holds That Plaintiffs' Prohibited Transaction Complaint Need Not Address the (Possible) Availability of an Exemption
"Ultimately, these claims will come down to a dispute over whether the service provider's compensation is -- as required by the exemption -- 'reasonable.' ... [In] contrast to a prudence claim, where the ultimate issue is the reasonableness of the
fiduciary's process, and where comparisons of fees under the plan with fees under other comparable plans are simply a proxy (preliminary to discovery) for an imprudent process, here the issue is the 'objective' reasonableness of the service provider fees themselves, where those comparisons are the main issue." [Cunningham v. Cornell Univ., No. 23-1007 (S.Ct. Apr. 17, 2025)] MORE >>
October Three Consulting
|
|
Another Circuit Split Over Burden-Shifting Tees Up Potential Supreme Court Review
"[T]he Eleventh Circuit added to this growing divide by expressly rejecting the burden-shifting framework adopted by several circuits, including the First, Fourth, Fifth, and Eighth. Instead, the court reaffirmed a more defense-oriented standard grounded in traditional principles
of civil liability, holding that plaintiffs bear the burden of proving all elements of their claim, including loss causation." [Pizarro v. Home Depot, No. 22-13643 (11th Cir. Aug. 2, 2024; cert. pet. filed Dec. 3, 2024; Solicitor General brief requested Apr. 21, 2025)] MORE >>
Maynard Nexsen
|
|
Mitigating Forfeiture Litigation Risk
"To mitigate risks and enhance clarity, plan sponsors should consider adopting a written policy that specifies the order in which forfeitures can be used if that order is not specified in the plan document or adoption agreement, and the timing in which they will be used. By
establishing this policy, sponsors can provide a clear framework for the management of forfeitures, helping all parties involved to understand how these funds will be allocated." MORE >>
Moss Adams LLP
|
|
Rising Hardship Withdrawals Putting Retirement at Risk
"The rise in 401(k) hardship withdrawals sends a loud and clear signal that employees are in need of additional financial support to help manage unexpected expenses. By offering personalized advice, promoting emergency savings, and discussing health savings options, plan sponsors
can help employees stay on track with their retirement savings while navigating financial challenges." MORE >>
RPAG
|
|
Retirement Plan Participants Seek Lifetime Income and Guidance
"60% worry that they will run out of money from their employer-sponsored retirement plan during retirement. 70% say they would consider adding an annuity to their employer-sponsored retirement plan if it was available. Over half (54%) say they would pay a fee for an advice
service to manage their annuity contributions based on their personal financial situation and retirement goals." MORE >>
Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America
|
|
2026 IRS Limits Forecast, as of March 2025
"Since September 30, 2024, the CPI has increased about 1.4%. Projecting monthly increases of 0.25% through September 2025 results in an annual increase of about 2.8% for [this] 6-month actual/6-month forecast projection." MORE >>
Milliman
|
|
Public Pension Funding Index, April 2025
"The estimated funded status of the 100 largest U.S. public pension plans fell from 81.1% as of February 28, 2025, to 79.5% as of March 31, 2025 ... Trade and tariff uncertainty impacted financial markets during March and caused this result." MORE >>
Milliman
|
Benefits in General |
|
Supreme Court Sides with Cornell Plan Participants on a Technical Point with Big Implications
"To survive a motion to dismiss under ERISA Section 406(a)(1)(C), a plaintiff must only plausibly allege: [1] A fiduciary caused the plan to engage in a transaction; [2] The fiduciary
knew or should have known it involved furnishing goods, services, or facilities; [3] The transaction was with a party in interest." [Cunningham v. Cornell Univ., No. 23-1007 (S.Ct. Apr. 17, 2025)] MORE >>
Boutwell Fay LLP
|
|
Supreme Court Opens the Door to More Litigation with Decision on Pleading Standard in ERISA Prohibited Transaction Cases
"Justice Sotomayor suggested that courts ... may require plaintiffs to file a reply to defendants' answers ... (Justice Alito echoed that suggestion and took it one step further: 'District courts should strongly consider utilizing this option -- and
employing the other safeguards that the Court describes -- to achieve 'the prompt disposition of insubstantial claims.')" [Cunningham v. Cornell Univ., No. 23-1007 (S.Ct. Apr. 17, 2025)] MORE >>
Trucker Huss
|
|
Non-Negotiables for Benefit Packages
"[1] Comprehensive healthcare coverage ... [2] Retirement and financial wellness benefits ... [3] Flexible work and leave policies ... [4] Mental health support beyond employee assistance programs ... [5] Telemedicine and virtual
care." MORE >>
ebn
|
|
Employee Benefits Jobs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected New Discussions |
|
Terminated Participant Has Loan Balance But Not Yet Eligible for Withdrawal: Loan Default or Loan Offset?
"Participant terminates in 2025. Plan provides termination distributions following the close of plan year in which termination occurs (and no partial withdrawals for termination distributions). Therefore termination distribution can occur in 2026. Participant has a Participant
Loan balance at termination. Loan Programs states it is due and payable upon termination of service. "Q: Since the Participant is not yet eligible for a termination distribution, and further the plan does not permit partial withdrawals for Termination,
is the loan balance a 2025 'deemed distribution' due to default (end of calendar quarter following quarter first payment is missed), which must be carried on the plan's books with (phantom) accrued interest until such time the Participant requests a termination distribution presumably in 2026? Or is it a 2025 'plan loan offset' since the Participant is terminated even though the Plan does not permit a
termination withdrawal at this time, or partial withdrawals for terminated participants? Concern with the latter: Treas. Reg. Section 1.72(p)-1, Q&A-13(b) provides that, in the event of a 'plan loan offset', the amount of the account balance that is offset against the loan is an actual distribution for purposes of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC), not a deemed distribution under IRC Section 72(p).
The concern being an actual distribution is not yet payable by the plan -- it is not clear to me if this would (inadvertently) be an operational failure."
BenefitsLink Message Boards
|
|
|
Press Releases |
|
Income Lab: Retirement Planning Just Got Faster and Easier for Advisors Who Custody With Schwab Advisor Services™
Income Lab
|
|
|
Webcasts and Conferences (Retirement Plans / Executive Compensation) |
|
Future Focus: Your Role in Shaping America’s Retirement System
May 28, 2025 WEBINAR
PSCA [Plan Sponsor Council of America]
|
|
Structuring Phantom Incentive Plans for Privately Held Corporations: Mechanics, Tax Obstacles, and Optimization
June 10, 2025 WEBINAR
Strafford
|
|
ERISA 2025: The Evolving World
August 4, 2025 WEBINAR
PLI [Practising Law Institute]
|
|
|
Last Issue's Most Popular Items |
|
More Discretion, More Documentation: Recovering Overpayments Under SECURE 2.0
Bricker Graydon
|
|
Supreme Court Clarifies Pleading Rules for Retirement Plan Litigation
SCOTUSblog
|
|
Supreme Court Lowers Bar to Pleading Prohibited Transactions, Despite 'Serious Concerns' of Meritless Litigation
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
|
|
Unsubscribe |
Change Email Address
Search Past Issues |
Privacy Policy
Submit an Article |
Contact Us |
Advertise Here
Copyright 2025 BenefitsLink.com, Inc. All materials contained in this newsletter are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of BenefitsLink.com, Inc., or in the case of third party materials, the owner of those materials. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notices from copies of the content.
BenefitsLink® Retirement Plans Newsletter, ISSN no. 1536-9587.
Links to web sites other than BenefitsLink.com and EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com are offered as a service to our readers. We are not involved in their production and are not responsible for their content.
|