Get This Daily Newsletter by Email

Retirement Plans Newsletter

June 2, 2025

BenefitsLink.com logo
EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com logo

💼  2 New Job Opportunities

 

[Guidance Overview]

Cryptocurrency No Longer a Non-Starter for 401(k) Plans: Real World Implications

"For a responsible 401(k) plan fiduciary, the revocation of the Prior Guidance does not give the green light to add cryptocurrency as an investment option; rather, it simply places cryptocurrency on a level playing field with any other potential investment option."  MORE >>

Trucker Huss

[Guidance Overview]

Transcript of IRS Podcast: Operating Your 403(b) Plan (PDF)

"You must now have a written program containing all terms and conditions of the plan.... A written program can consist of bundling the salary reduction agreement, summary plan description, custodial account, annuity arrangement and any other plan documents you may already have in place." [Also available: Transcript of employee-oriented podcast: 403(b) Tax-Sheltered Annuity Plans]  MORE >>

Internal Revenue Service [IRS]

District Court Interprets Multiemployer Plan Fee-Shifting Provision to Encompass Attorneys' Fees and Costs Incurred in Related Litigation

"The decision ... interprets ERISA's mandatory fee-shifting provision for collection actions to encompass fees incurred in parallel actions where fees would not otherwise be recoverable or where the award is not mandatory. Plans and employers should consider whether the decision lays the groundwork for a mandatory award of fees to a plan that, in addition to successfully pursuing an employer for delinquent contributions or withdrawal liability, prevails in arbitration by the employer to challenge the amount of the liability." [International Painters & Allied Trades Industry Pension Fund v. Florida Glass of Tampa Bay, Inc., No. 23-0045 (D. Md. Mar. 5, 2025)  MORE >>

Proskauer

Beyond Missing: Targeting Unresponsive Participants in Retirement Plans

"Multi-year data from one mega-plan sponsor with over 250,000 participants revealed that around 10.5% of requested distribution checks for balances under $1,000 went uncashed and required eventual resolution.... Here are six key factors that can contribute to unresponsive participants ... [P]lan sponsors should consider adopting the following best practices[.]"  MORE >>

401(k) Specialist

Adaptability: The Next Step in 401(k) Plan Personalization

"A newly released survey found what it called a 'powerful shift' in how Americans want to save for retirement: they're looking for plans that adapt to them. More specifically, ... [the survey] reveals a growing demand for personalization, simplified communication, and support for the financial realities workers face today."  MORE >>

American Retirement Association [ARA]

The Challenge with Forfeitures

"Although the [IRS] has long approved the language permitting discretionary forfeiture use, ... these new claims by the participant-plaintiffs have had some success in the courts. However, courts in different areas of the country are ruling differently, and none of the cases have yet been decided by an appeals court. To avoid being a possible target ... many employers are amending their plans or adopting a written administrative policy that clearly states how forfeitures will be used. The idea: remove the discretion and you remove the potential for the claim of fiduciary breach for making the 'wrong' choice."  MORE >>

Ferenczy Benefits Law Center

401(k) Determination Letter Rate Slowed in 2024

"The IRS sent determination letters in 2024 at the same pace as it had the year before in response to requests from DB plans; however, it sent less than half as many to DC plans in 2024 as it did in 2023."  MORE >>

Plan Sponsor Council of America [PSCA]

Public Pension Funding Index, May 2025

"During April, markets experienced sometimes daily tariff-influenced volatility, but by month’s end the largest U.S. public pension plans saw a positive 0.4% monthly investment return."  MORE >>

Milliman

Distribution Rules When the IRA Beneficiary is the Owner's Estate

"If an IRA is inherited through an estate, the distribution rules for the estate apply, even if the IRA is later transferred to a person. Distribution rules depend on whether the IRA owner died before their RBD.... Always share the full history of inherited IRAs with any custodian or tax advisor. If you're doing estate planning, work with a tax advisor and estate planning attorney to decide whether naming your estate as the IRA beneficiary makes sense for your estate planning needs."  MORE >>

Denise Appleby, via Morningstar

[Opinion]

How Plan Sponsors Could Unknowingly Be Violating ERISA

"Under current regulations, most human resources executives routinely roll over accounts with balances of less than $7,000 into safe harbor individual retirement accounts, thinking they are preserving and helping grow employees' retirement savings. What they may not realize is that some safe harbor IRA providers are charging exorbitant fees that gradually deplete balances, at times down to $0."  MORE >>

PLANSPONSOR; login may be may be required

[Opinion]

SPARK Institute Comment Letter to IRS: Recommendations for 2025-2026 Priority Guidance Plan (PDF)

"[T]he SPARK Institute is urging Treasury and IRS to prioritize projects that would: [1] Harmonize IRS and [DOL] electronic delivery standards; [2] Finalize the 2022 remote witnessing proposal; [3] Implement the new Saver's Match; [4] Implement SECURE 1.0's and 2.0's mandatory changes and provide certainty on 457(b) amendment deadlines; [5] Finalize the 2023 forfeiture proposal; and [6] Update and restate the Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System (EPCRS) in accordance with SECURE 2.0."  MORE >>

The SPARK Institute

Employee Benefits Jobs

💼

Regional Sales Consultant

The Retirement Advantage, Inc (TRA)

Remote

View job as Regional Sales Consultant for The Retirement Advantage, Inc (TRA)

💼

Actuarial Analyst - Defined Benefits

CBIZ

Remote / Independence OH

View job as Actuarial Analyst - Defined Benefits for CBIZ

Selected New Discussions

Did Not Distribute Cashout Under $5K -- Failure to Provide Benefit on 5500?

"There's a question on the 5500-SF: Has the plan failed to provide any benefit when due under the plan? If a plan did not process the mandatory cashout, do we answer yes? The 5500-SF instructions only reference RMDs. But does it include other distributions? Like the cashouts? Or when someone requests a distribution but it languishes for some reason."

BenefitsLink Message Boards

Press Releases

DOL Launches Opinion Letter Program Across Five Agencies to Expand Compliance Assistance

U.S. Department of Labor [DOL]

iJoin Launches CONNECT to Enable Flexible Access to its Technology Stack

iJoin

Webcasts and Conferences
(Retirement Plans / Executive Compensation)

Cunningham v. Cornell University: Recent SCOTUS Ruling, ERISA Prohibited Transaction Claims, Pleading Standards, Exemptions

July 17, 2025 WEBINAR

Strafford

Last Issue's Most Popular Items

Navigating Participant Data Cyberthreats: A Guide for Plan Sponsors (PDF)

Defined Contribution Institutional Investment Association [DCIIA]

DOL Rescinds Guidance Discouraging Cryptocurrency Investments (PDF)

Thomson Reuters / EBIA

CalSavers Deadline Is Looming and Most Small Businesses Are Unprepared

Guideline

Unsubscribe  |   Change Email Address

Search Past Issues   |   Privacy Policy

Submit an Article   |   Contact Us   |   Advertise Here

Copyright 2025 BenefitsLink.com, Inc. All materials contained in this newsletter are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of BenefitsLink.com, Inc., or in the case of third party materials, the owner of those materials. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notices from copies of the content.

BenefitsLink® Retirement Plans Newsletter, ISSN no. 1536-9587.

Links to web sites other than BenefitsLink.com and EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com are offered as a service to our readers. We are not involved in their production and are not responsible for their content.