Get This Daily Newsletter by Email

Retirement Plans Newsletter

July 24, 2025

BenefitsLink.com logo
EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com logo

 

[Guidance Overview]

Solo 401(k) 2026 Mandatory Roth Requirements for FICA Wages

"Solo 401(k)s offer substantial retirement savings potential due to their high contribution limits for business owners without common-law employees. New rules starting in 2026 will require 'high earners' to make catch-up contributions as Roth, impacting solo 401(k) participants receiving W-2 wages. Properly identifying what qualifies as a 'catch-up contribution' can be complex and may not always align with separate elections."  MORE >>

EisnerAmper

[Guidance Overview]

Employers May Offer a New Benefit Through 'Trump Accounts'

"If the employer chooses to make contributions, employers must have a written plan that follows certain rules such as the prohibition of discrimination against certain income groups and notice to eligible employees. Contributions could also be made by an employer to an employee who is under the age of 18 and has their own Trump account. Employers may choose to contribute up to $2,500 either directly to the employee or the employee's dependent."  MORE >>

Littler

Every Plan Commits Prohibited Transactions: The Cornell University Decision

"The recent Supreme Court decision ... held that the burden of proof for determining whether the conditions of 408(b)(2) were satisfied [is] on the plan fiduciaries, meaning that plaintiffs' attorneys can simply allege that the fiduciaries hired service providers and then the fiduciaries must prove that they satisfied the conditions of the exemption." [Cunningham v. Cornell Univ., No. 23-1007 (S.Ct. Apr. 17, 2025)]  MORE >>

FredReish.com

Changing Last Year's Assumptions This Year: Gotcha or Copacetic?

"Just before its summer recess, the Supreme Court agreed to review whether multiemployer pension funds can impose withdrawal liability based on actuarial assumptions adopted after the relevant plan year. The expected decision may have significant implications for employers' ability to assess the impact of a contemplated withdrawal." [M & K Employee Solutions, LLC v. Trustees of the IAM National Pension Fund, No. 22-7157 (D.C. Cir Feb. 9, 2024; cert. pet. granted Jun. 30, 2025 No. 23-1209)]   MORE >>

Seyfarth

House Ponders Reform of EBSA's Enforcement Practices

"In November, it emerged that EBSA was sharing investigative materials with plaintiffs involved in a fiduciary breach lawsuit involving an [ESOP] in Colorado.... During the hearing, Ali Khawar, the former deputy head of EBSA, added that there have only been 12 such agreements in the last 15 years.... Khawar was the lone voice at the hearing who spoke in defense of EBSA's enforcement.... Two bills are pending before Congress in this space: the EBSA Investigations Transparency Act [HR 2869] and the Balance the Scales Act [HR 2958]."  MORE >>

American Retirement Association [ARA]

Managed Accounts Can Offer Participants a More Personalized Approach

"Managed accounts can provide retirement savers with a more personalized asset allocation, but not every managed account platform provides the same depth and level of customization. Additionally, that level of personalization comes at a price. Plan fiduciaries should carefully consider the cost, quality, and composition of those designs."  MORE >>

FiduciaryAdvisors LLC

Rollovers May Reach $1.1 Trillion by 2030

"By 2030, U.S. retail retirement plan rollovers are expected to reach $1.15 trillion ... That would represent a 34% increase from the estimated $855 billion in retail rollovers expected in 2025 and nearly double the $612 billion in retail rollovers in 2020.... The average size of rollovers for people aged 50 to 74 more than doubled since 2007, increasing from $101,400 to an estimated $220,00[.] "  MORE >>

planadviser

Benefits in General

[Guidance Overview]

How Self-Audits Help Build a Culture of Compliance and Trust

"Many of our agencies offer self-audit programs, which are voluntary tools to help the regulated community proactively assess and improve compliance with the labor laws we enforce.... Self-audits enable you to identify and fix potential violations, reduce the likelihood of litigation, and demonstrate a good-faith commitment to following the law. They also help ensure that workers get the protections and benefits they are entitled to -- like timely wages, fair and safe working conditions, and benefits security."  MORE >>

Keith Sonderling, Deputy Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor [DOL]

[Opinion]

Best Practices for ERISA Plan Sponsors and Fiduciaries in a Changing World: Staying Joined at the Hip to a Good Trial Lawyer

"[T]he ever-expanding range of risks that plan sponsors and fiduciaries are facing, and the rapidly evolving decisions they have to make, call for a litigator’s advice, and preferably not any litigator, but one with both significant courtroom experience and deep substantive knowledge of ERISA."  MORE >>

Stephen Rosenberg, The Wagner Law Group

Selected New Discussions

Hardship Withdrawal Flexibility as to Money Types

"Participant is under age 59½ and has less than 5 years in the Plan. Participant took a hardship withdrawal and Plan Sponsor created 1099-R's splitting the H/S between both 401(k) and Roth. Plan Sponsor did not realize earnings on the Roth portion are taxable and they didn't calculate a taxable amount on the earnings of the Roth that were allocated to the H/S. They are asking now, after the fact, if the Roth portion of the H/S can be treated fully as basis. I looked in the Plan Doc but couldn't find that it specifies. It only says that a Plan Admin can choose how to order the money types. They chose to go prorata, and yes they are informing the TPA just now about this from last year."

BenefitsLink Message Boards

Amending NQDC Plan to Fix Drafting Errors

"A client has a NQDC Plan that they wanted to be triggered by change in control. The change in control they were expecting is occurring, but we reviewed it and they drafted the change in control definition poorly (it's 409A compliance, but too narrow and it doesn't cover this transaction). So, the payment that was supposed to be triggered by this transaction isn't going to be triggered. They would like to do a corrective amendment to expand the definition of 'change in control' to cover this transaction. Note: the transaction falls within a 409A-compliant definition, so that is not an issue, it just doesn't fall within the plan definition. I told them changing the definition would be an impermissible acceleration. Do you all agree, or is there some wiggle room here?"

BenefitsLink Message Boards

Press Releases

Cohen & Buckmann Elevates New Partners: Irene Bassock and Brett Good

Cohen & Buckmann P.C.

Last Issue's Most Popular Items

DOL Finds Citigroup's Racial Equity Program Unlawful, Rescinds Previous Opinion

PLANSPONSOR; login may be may be required

Relocation Reimbursements Can Pose 409A Risks

Mintz

Industry Voices Flag EBSA Practices in House Subcommittee Hearing

401(k) Specialist

Unsubscribe  |   Change Email Address

Search Past Issues   |   Privacy Policy

Submit an Article   |   Contact Us   |   Advertise Here

Copyright 2025 BenefitsLink.com, Inc. All materials contained in this newsletter are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of BenefitsLink.com, Inc., or in the case of third party materials, the owner of those materials. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notices from copies of the content.

BenefitsLink® Retirement Plans Newsletter, ISSN no. 1536-9587.

Links to web sites other than BenefitsLink.com and EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com are offered as a service to our readers. We are not involved in their production and are not responsible for their content.