Get This Daily Newsletter by Email

Retirement Plans Newsletter

September 19, 2025

BenefitsLink.com logo
EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com logo

💼  New Job Opportunity Today

 

[Guidance Overview]

IRS Issues Final Regulations on Catch-Up Rule Changes

"[This article summarizes] how the final regulations resolved key questions raised by the SECURE 2.0 catch-up contribution changes ... Given the complexity, coordination among employers and their counsel, recordkeepers, and payroll providers is essential."  MORE >>

Groom Law Group

[Guidance Overview]

IRS Releases Final Catch-Up Regulation

"Notwithstanding intense pressure from sponsors and providers, IRS is not extending its temporary 'administrative transition period'  ... The final rules, however, generally apply to contributions in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2026. For 2026 (and prior years), a 'good faith interpretation standard' applies."  MORE >>

October Three Consulting

Third Circuit Upholds PBGC SFA Regs and Enforces Employer's Agreement Regarding Withdrawal Liability

"The Third Circuit’s decision resolves critical questions regarding the treatment of tens of billions of dollars in SFA, and provides both employers and plans with some flexibility to deviate from ERISA’s default rules regarding withdrawal liability." [In re Yellow Corp., No. 25-1421 (3d Cir. Sep. 16, 2025)]   MORE >>

Groom Law Group

Applying Sun Capital: District Court Finds Private Equity Fund Liable for ERISA Withdrawal Liability

"This decision ... is arguably the first time a district court applied the 'investment plus' and 'partnership-in-fact' tests for determining potential withdrawal liability in the private equity context since the First Circuit issued its rulings in Sun Capital ... in 2013 and 2019." [Longroad Asset Management LLC v. Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust, No. 23-0738 (W.D. Mo. Aug. 19, 2025)]  MORE >>

Ropes & Gray LLP

Decisions During M&A: What Happens to the 401(k)?

"The state of a seller's 401(k) plan can reveal much about the organization's operations and potential hidden liabilities.... Whether the deal is structured as a stock or asset purchase significantly shapes retirement plan strategy.... Payroll integration is often a decisive factor in plan strategy.  ... Outstanding participant loans also require close attention."  MORE >>

401(k) Specialist

PEPs Gaining Ground, But One Size May Not Fit All

"According to the DOL, per-participant costs in the three largest PEPs ranged from 0.23% to 0.42% in 2023, compared with Morningstar's data showing the median cost in small stand-alone plans at 0.84%.... PEP adoption by small businesses has yet to become widespread.... Employers seeking flexibility in match formulas, auto-features, or financial wellness programs may find many PEPs too rigid."  MORE >>

RPAG

Benefits in General

Daniel Aronowitz Confirmed to Lead EBSA

"The newly confirmed Assistant Secretary of Labor and head of the Employee Benefits Security Administration has pledged to streamline retirement plan oversight and end the ‘war on ESOPs.’... During his confirmation hearing, he stressed that he intends to make clear that fiduciaries, not the DOL or plaintiffs’ lawyers, should decide what is best for retirement plan participants."  MORE >>

PLANADVISER

District Court Denies Insurer's Attempt to Block Discovery in ERISA Benefits Case

"The decision reaffirms that: [1] Reconsideration is an extraordinary remedy, not a vehicle to reargue issues already decided. [2] District courts maintain discretion to allow discovery in ERISA cases, particularly where issues of bias or fairness may be explored. [3] Insurers opposing discovery must identify specific burdens or improper requests; generalized objections are inadequate." [Gaines v. United of Omaha Life Ins. Co., No. 25-0167 (N.D. Ind. Sept. 18, 2025)]  MORE >>

Roberts Disability Law

Executive Compensation and Nonqualified Plans

A Noteworthy Top Hat Decision from the Eleventh Circuit

"Affirming a district court decision, the appeals court ruled on summary judgment that a plan amendment to cash out participants on plan termination 'adversely affected' the life annuities of some participants, and was therefore unlawful under the plans and ERISA." [Hoak v. Ledford, No. 24-12148 (11th Cir. Aug. 26, 2025)]  MORE >>

Groom Law Group

Employee Benefits Jobs

💼

Retirement Operations Consultant

TruStage

Verona WI / IA / SD / Hybrid

View job as Retirement Operations Consultant for TruStage

Selected New Discussions

Employee Roth Elections Not Withheld Correctly for 2024

"An audited plan just told me today that there are 13 employees that did not have the correct amount of Roth withheld based on their elections. The amount withheld was based on the after-tax net pay, not gross pay. From what I'm reading since it is just past 9-15 the missed Roth needs to be contributed AND QNEC equal to 50% of the missed Roth plus earnings. Any ideas as to best way to credit lost earnings -- so it is probably 26 pays, 13 employees. SO I will find a way to estimate plan earnings -- perhaps look at the entire plan earnings for the year reduce 50% since missed evenly through the year."

BenefitsLink® Message Boards

May a 'Notice' About Discretionary Matching Contributions Be in the Summary Plan Description?

"In a package of documents accompanying an adoption agreement to use a set of IRS-preapproved documents, a service provider furnished a 'Discretionary Matching Contribution Notice' with this description: 'This form describes the formula used if any discretionary matching contributions are made to the plan. This notice must be provided to each participant who received a discretionary matching contribution no later than 60 days following the date the last contribution is made to the plan for the plan year.'

"The plan's sponsor/administrator does not use the service provider's assembled summary plan description. Also, it does not use a summary of material modifications. Instead, we write and deliver an updated summary plan description before each year, and more often than yearly if there is a change. Rather than a distinct 'notice', the plan's sponsor/administrator would prefer to include the content about discretionary matching contributions in the SPD (and omit anything separate). Does anything about reliance on the IRS's opinion letter preclude delivering the information that way? Does anything about in a basic plan document preclude delivering the information that way? Is there another reason it would be unwise to deliver the information that way?"

BenefitsLink® Message Boards

Press Releases

Betterment at Work and First Citizens Wealth Launch 401(k) Solution for Business Clients

Betterment at Work

Webinars, Podcasts and Conferences
(Retirement Plans / Executive Compensation)

How an Employee Benefits Attorney Can Save You Money on Plan Corrections

ON-DEMAND WEBINAR

KLB Benefits Law Group

Retirement Tier Investing: Withdrawal Strategies

ON-DEMAND WEBINAR

PLANSPONSOR

Last Issue's Most Popular Items

Industry Best Practices and Procedures for Roth Catch-Up Contributions (PDF)

The SPARK Institute

Delaying Social Security Benefits Isn't Always The Best Decision

Nerd's Eye View

'Shifting' to Pass ACP Testing

American Retirement Association [ARA]

Unsubscribe  |   Change Email Address

Search Past Issues   |   Privacy Policy

Submit an Article   |   Contact Us   |   Advertise Here

Copyright 2025 BenefitsLink.com, Inc. All materials contained in this newsletter are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of BenefitsLink.com, Inc., or in the case of third party materials, the owner of those materials. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notices from copies of the content.

BenefitsLink® Retirement Plans Newsletter, ISSN no. 1536-9587.

Links to web sites other than BenefitsLink.com and EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com are offered as a service to our readers. We are not involved in their production and are not responsible for their content.