|
Retirement Plans Newsletter
October 3, 2025
|
|
|
| |
|
[Guidance Overview]
The Roth Catch-Up Regs Are Final: What You Need to Know!
"A key decision for employers is whether to implement the deemed election process.... A plan may use either of the two new correction methods, but it must apply the same correction method to similarly situated participants.... The deadline to correct a failure using these
correction methods depends on which limit is the basis for the redesignating pre-tax deferrals as catch-up contributions.... Special rules apply to dual-qualified plans (plans qualified under both U.S. and Puerto Rico law). " MORE >>
Trucker Huss
|
|
[Guidance Overview]
Tax Exempt Organizations Sponsoring 457(b) Plans Must Amend Plans by Year-End
"457(b) plans ... were neglected and excluded from the IRS Notice that extended the amendment deadline for other plans and governmental sponsors of 457(b) plans from the end of 2025 to the end of 2026.... Tax Exempt 457(b) Plans must be amended by the end of this year
for the new RMD ages and it doesn't appear there will be any further extensions." MORE >>
Trucker Huss
|
|
[Guidance Overview]
SECURE 2.0 Act Reshapes Puerto Rico Retirement Savings Rules (PDF)
"SECURE 2.0 Act § 107, Increase in Age for Required Beginning Date for Mandatory Distributions ...
applies to dual-qualified plans but not to Puerto Rico-only qualified plans. And since SECURE 2.0 Act § 125, Improving Coverage for Part-Time Employees, amended ERISA ... all ERISA-covered retirement plans in operation in Puerto Rico must comply with this change....
[D]ual-qualified 401(k) plans can safely and validly limit catch-up contributions by their Puerto Rico participants to a maximum of $1,500 per year, always on a pre-tax basis." MORE >>
Benefits Puerto Rico in Bloomberg Tax Management Memorandum
|
|
Final Judgment in ESG Fiduciary Breach Claim: Monetary Damages Denied, but Targeted Equitable Relief Imposed
"The court issued tailored injunctions aimed at stewardship practices, fiduciary independence and transparency while declining to disturb the plans' investment structure.... [E]ven though there are no monetary damages, [the judgment] imposes significant restrictions on how
American Airlines and its plan fiduciaries can manage their plans going forward.... ERISA fiduciaries should be taking steps to demonstrate how all investment decisions and shareholder engagement/proxy voting activities are driven by pecuniary objectives." [Spence v. Am.
Airlines, Inc., No. 23-0552 (N.D. Tex. Sep. 30, 2025)] MORE >>
Ropes & Gray LLP
|
|
2026 Will Test Retirement Plan Sponsors
"As plan sponsors grapple with the complexities of new investment options, they also face a very different and rapidly escalating threat -- AI-driven phishing attacks on retirement accounts.... The SECURE 2.0 provisions are nuanced, introducing new requirements for plan
sponsors each year since 2023, and 2026 will be no different.... Litigation pressures are also expected to intensify, particularly around forfeitures and plan fees." MORE >>
American Retirement Association [ARA]
|
|
Should Plan Sponsors Limit Hardship Withdrawals?
"Nearly half of respondents ... stated they just process all requests or allow self-certification while 20% stated that the plan limits the number of hardships per year. Some respondents state it's not their job to oversee it and people should be allowed to manage their
money as they see fit, while others limit access. Most provide additional education or assistance with resources." MORE >>
American Retirement Association [ARA]
|
|
Pension Finance Update, September 2025
"Higher stocks again drove improvement in pension finances during September.... [T]raditional Plan A gained a fraction of 1%, ending the month up almost 6% for the year, while the more conservative Plan B gained a fraction of 1% last month, ending the month up more than 1%
through the first three quarters of 2025." MORE >>
October Three Consulting
|
|
U.S. Corporate Pension Plans Funding Status, September 2025
"The aggregate funded ratio for U.S. corporate pension plans is estimated to have increased by 0.4 percentage points in September, ending the month at 102.6% ... The aggregate funded ratio is estimated to have increased by 2.0%, 4.8% and 1.0% in the third quarter,
year-to-date and over the trailing twelve months, respectively." MORE >>
Wilshire Associates
|
Benefits in General |
|
Good News and Bad News in the Priority Guidance Plan from Treasury and IRS
"[M]any SECURE 2.0 projects are still on the
list. And, many OBBBA projects made the list, including changes to Code sections 162(m), 4960, and 223.... Several important guidance projects have been dropped, including a longstanding guidance project on VEBA and other welfare benefit funds under Code sections 419, 419A,
etc." MORE >>
Groom Law Group
|
Selected New Discussions |
|
3(16) Plan Administrator Indemnification
"Is anyone familiar with a 3(16) service agreement and what is typical language for indemnification? We are reviewing a contract for a potential 3(16) for our client. For example, I have seen one agreement refer to the indemnification of fiduciaries in the basic plan document and
another one that limits liability to the fees collected from the Employer in the prior 36 months preceding the date of the error, which would equate to a total of $18,000.Thank you for any insight."
BenefitsLink® Message Boards
|
|
Contributions and Matching After 401(a)(17) Limit Has Been Reached?
"How are plans typically set-up with regards to employee deferrals and matching contributions once someone hits the 401(a)(17) limit? I believe most plans will still allow contributions once the limit has been reached (I've only seen one that stops contributions), but
curious to know how matching contributions are handled once the comp limit has been reached. "Do plans have an option to match once the 401(a)(17) limit is reached or must they stop matching? If stopping is a requirement, what section of the law/code dictates that it must
stop? Also, if matching dollars must stop at the limit, won't a plan with a true-up negate some of the negative impact a high earner might experience. For example, a plan that matches 100% of contributions up to 6%, wouldn't that provide up to $21,000 in matching contributions in catch-up? So maybe the impact would be the timing of when an employee potentially receives the match?"
BenefitsLink® Message Boards
|
|
|
Webinars, Podcasts and Conferences (Retirement Plans / Executive Compensation) |
|
Transamerica PEP Rally
October 23, 2025 WEBINAR
Pension Education Council of Atlanta [PECA]
|
|
|
Last Issue's Most Popular Items |
|
IRS Finalizes Rules for SECURE 2.0 'Super Catch-Up' Contributions
Mercer
|
|
Deadline for Non-Profit 457(b) Plan Amendments Is December 31, 2025
Boutwell Fay LLP
|
|
Consider Nonqualified Plans When Implementing New Roth Catch-Up Contribution Rules
Verrill Dana LLP
|
|
Unsubscribe |
Change Email Address
Search Past Issues |
Privacy Policy
Submit an Article |
Contact Us |
Advertise Here
Copyright 2025 BenefitsLink.com, Inc. All materials contained in this newsletter are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of BenefitsLink.com, Inc., or in the case of third party materials, the owner of those materials. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notices from copies of the content.
BenefitsLink® Retirement Plans Newsletter, ISSN no. 1536-9587.
Links to web sites other than BenefitsLink.com and EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com are offered as a service to our readers. We are not involved in their production and are not responsible for their content.
|