|
Retirement Plans Newsletter
October 8, 2025
|
|
|
|
💼 3 New Job Opportunities
|
| |
|
[Guidance Overview]
SECURE 2.0 Update: Final Roth Catch-Up Regulations, More Decisions to Make
"The deemed approach is the least disruptive to employees, and it affords employers greater flexibility in correcting operational mistakes related to the Roth catch-up mandate.... If the deemed approach is used, [employers should discuss with their] recordkeeper and payroll
provider whether it will apply when an employee's contributions reach the 401(a)(30) limit, or only when pre-tax contributions reach the limit." MORE >>
Kutak Rock LLP
|
|
[Sponsor]
Turning Plan Document Review into Actionable Insights
PlanPort revolutionizes how advisors, recordkeepers, and TPAs use retirement plan documents across their business operations –- delivering efficiency, accuracy, review, and automation like never before. Now supporting 403(b) and 457(b) plans!
|
|

|
|
Senate Confirms Janet Dhillon as PBGC Chief
"The U.S. Senate on Oct. 7 confirmed Janet Dhillon to serve as the Director of the [PBGC]. She will serve a 5-year term. Dhillon was one of 107 nominees whose en banc confirmation for a variety of offices came on the evening of Oct. 7 in a 51-47
vote." MORE >>
American Retirement Association [ARA]
|
|
AT&T PRT Case Finally Dismissed
"A federal judge has accepted the recommendations of a magistrate judge in dismissing a suit challenging AT&T's move
to transfer pension obligations to a third party, but he also acknowledged that an injury sufficient to bring suit existed." [Piercy v. AT&T Inc., No. 24-10608 (D. Mass. Sep. 30, 2025)] MORE >>
Plan Sponsor Council of America [PSCA]
|
|
District Court Rules Retirees Have Standing to Challenge Bristol-Myers Pension Risk Transfer
"Defendants contended that plaintiffs have not missed a benefit and thus they have suffered no harm from the PRT.... The court further identified a separate basis for Article III standing, which was that the PRT diminished the value of their benefits. This was because 'the
Athene transaction ejected Plaintiffs from the ambit of ERISA.' " [Doherty v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.,
No. 24-6628 (S.D.N.Y., Sep. 29, 2025)] MORE >>
Kantor & Kantor
|
|
Bristol-Myers PRT Suit Moves Forward
"Although the series of suits challenging pension risk transfer (PRT) decisions has to date largely favored fiduciary defendants, a federal judge has ruled that the allegations are sufficient to move past a motion to dismiss.... [T]he ruling here ... alongside the recent decision in AT&T ... will likely spur more such litigation, particularly in view of the increasing trend toward pension risk transfer transactions." [Doherty v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., No. 24-6628 (S.D.N.Y., Sep. 29, 2025)] MORE >>
American Retirement Association [ARA]
|
|
Plan Sponsors Remain Committed to De-Risking (PDF)
14 pages. "94% of companies with de-risking goals plan to completely divest all their pension plan liabilities, up very slightly from 93% in 2024. Among the 94% of companies that will divest their pension plan liabilities, 17% of plan sponsors say they will do so in under two
years ... 92% say their company is weighing its pension plan's value against the cost of the benefit.... 23% of plan sponsors have already started the PRT process, and 12% surveyed say they have already completed a pension risk transfer transaction." MORE >>
MetLife
|
|
Litigation Risk Thwarts Plan Sponsor Innovation
"89% of defined contribution plan sponsors and providers surveyed indicated that litigation risks are 'very significant' or 'somewhat significant' when they consider improving their services or changing their investment options.... [O]ne-quarter of respondents indicated they decided against providing more benefits to plan participants out of concern of facing litigation. More than 43% chose not to offer lifetime income options, citing the same concerns. " MORE >>
PLANSPONSOR; registration may be required
|
|
Year-End Compliance Issues for Single-Employer Defined Benefit and Defined Contribution Retirement Plans (PDF)
"Qualified plan amendments to DB and DC plans ... SECURE 2.0 -- related year-end action items for DC plans ... Annual participant notices, disclosures, and benefit statements for calendar year plans ... Other operational action items affecting single-employer
retirement plans." MORE >>
Milliman
|
|
Assessing the Risks of ESOPs For Employees, Managers and Business Owners: What the Research Tells Us (PDF)
27 pages. "This paper looks at each of these risks based on the now-extensive research that is available on all of these issues. The data show that: [1] ESOP plan participants fare far better than com- parable employees in comparable companies in terms of retirement
security ... [2] The default rate on ESOP leveraged transactions is close to zero.... [3] While ESOP firms do fail, they do so at a far lower rate than non-ESOP companies. [4] While litigation risk is a legitimate concern, only an average of about 17 cases per year make it to court, and the settlements are generally under $15,000 per participant." MORE >>
National Center for Employee Ownership [NCEO]
|
Executive Compensation and Nonqualified Plans |
|
Strategies to Optimize Incentive Stock Options
"While many employees focus on the upside possibilities, few understand in detail how ISOs function or the critical role that taxes play in shaping their real take-home value. Advisors are uniquely positioned to help clients navigate these complexities, especially since poor
planning around ISO exercises can create a substantial tax liability without generating the liquidity to pay it, thereby jeopardizing other aspects of the financial plan." MORE >>
Nerd's Eye View
|
|
Employee Benefits Jobs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected New Discussions |
|
Can a Non-U.S. Citizen Sign the 5500?
"US company was purchased by a UK company and we're winding the plan down. The US people are all gone -- at least anyone in any management capacity. Can the person who is handling the plan at the UK company sign as Plan Administrator (and/or Plan Sponsor), or does that
have to be a US citizen? All I can find is that it has to be signed under threat of perjury, which makes me think that the signer must be subject to US law."
BenefitsLink® Message Boards
|
|
How Should a Plan Handle an Ineligible Hardship Distribution?
"Client has a plan with self-certification of hardships. All requests are automatically approved based on employees 'signing off' that they have the required proof of hardship. Client did an audit and found an employee was abusing this, contacted them, and found that
they have been taking Hardships without any immediate need. "Client is looking for guidance on how to correct this. Initial thought was that the employee should repay what was taken that didn't have proof, however, the legal team at the provider stated that this
wasn't allowed. They were given the following: 'The sponsor of a retirement plan that allows hardship distributions cannot reclaim a hardship distribution after it has been disbursed to the participant. Rather, the sponsor can refuse to approve a hardship request prior to distribution if the participant is deemed not to have an immediate and heavy financial need or if the sponsor has actual knowledge that the
participant's self-certification of hardship is false. The plan sponsor does not have the authority to 'reclaim' money already distributed because hardship distributions are subject to taxes and potentially a 10% penalty. Reclaiming the money would essentially be canceling an early withdrawal, which isn't permitted under IRS rules after the funds have been paid out.' "Is this correct? I feel like I have seen this done at other places I have worked. If this is allowed, and the participant does not work with the client to pay back the funds, what should be done in that case?"
BenefitsLink® Message Boards
|
|
|
Press Releases |
|
Beacon Pointe Advisors Establishes Washington D.C. Presence with Female-Led RIA
Beacon Pointe Advisors
|
|
Thompson Hine Expands Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation Practice Nationally with Seven New Attorneys
Thompson Hine LLP
|
|
Ascensus Announces Planned Leadership Succession
Ascensus
|
|
|
Webinars, Podcasts and Conferences (Retirement Plans / Executive Compensation) |
|
Current Developments (2025)
November 6, 2025 WEBINAR
ASC
|
|
|
Last Issue's Most Popular Items |
|
Most Retirement Plan Sponsors Have Few 2025 Year-End Amendments
Mercer
|
|
Best Practices for Roth Catch-Up Contributions Under SECURE 2.0
CAPTRUST
|
|
The Evolution of ERISA Forfeiture Cases
Mayer Brown
|
|
Unsubscribe |
Change Email Address
Search Past Issues |
Privacy Policy
Submit an Article |
Contact Us |
Advertise Here
Copyright 2025 BenefitsLink.com, Inc. All materials contained in this newsletter are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of BenefitsLink.com, Inc., or in the case of third party materials, the owner of those materials. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notices from copies of the content.
BenefitsLink® Retirement Plans Newsletter, ISSN no. 1536-9587.
Links to web sites other than BenefitsLink.com and EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com are offered as a service to our readers. We are not involved in their production and are not responsible for their content.
|