Get This Daily Newsletter by Email

Health & Welfare Plans Newsletter

November 26, 2025

BenefitsLink.com logo
EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com logo

💼  New Job Opportunity Today

 

Eleventh Circuit Rules Insurer's Interpretation of Preexisting Condition Provision Was Unreasonable

"The court ruled that Reliance's interpretation was unreasonable 'because it completely elides the distinction between receiving medical care for symptoms not inconsistent with a preexisting condition and receiving medical care for a preexisting condition itself.'... The court deemed this position 'unreasonable -- full stop.' ... In the end, the court viewed Reliance as attempting to rewrite its policy after the fact[.]" [Johnson v. Reliance Standard Life Ins. Co., No. 23-13443 (11th Cir. Nov. 21, 2025)]  MORE >>

Kantor & Kantor

[Sponsor]

Happy Thanksgiving to our Readers!

We at BenefitsLink are thankful for YOU - the people who make it all possible and worthwhile. We'll be taking a brief publication break on Thursday and Friday, November 27 and 28. The daily BenefitsLink Newsletters will return on Monday, December 1.

Sponsored by BenefitsLink

Eleventh Circuit Precedent Continues to Shape Limited Discovery in ERISA Cases

"Although ERISA cases are often reviewed based solely on what the claims administrator considered, the court emphasized that limited discovery is appropriate where the standard of review is arbitrary and capricious -- a standard that applies when the plan grants the administrator discretionary authority." [Miller v. American United Life Ins. Co., No. 25-1670 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 24, 2025)]  MORE >>

Roberts Disability Law

COBRA Claim Dismissed Absent Proof That Former Employee Was Harmed by Insufficient Notice

"[The employee] claimed that the inadequate notice caused her to lose health and dental insurance, resulting in medical bills and canceled dental procedures. The court dismissed the case, holding that even if the employee suffered the alleged injuries, she had produced no evidence that the injuries were traceable to the deficient COBRA notice." [Marrow v. E.R. Carpenter Company, Inc., No. 23-2959 (M.D. Fla. Feb. 4, 2025)]   MORE >>

Thomson Reuters / EBIA

Class Action Challenges ERISA Compliance of Tobacco Cessation Program

"The class-action plaintiffs contend Meijer's smoking cessation wellness program did not satisfy ERISA Section 702 ... because participants who completed the program mid-year received only prospective relief rather than the 'same, full reward' of retroactive reimbursements for the entire plan year.... The complaint further alleges that the plan's 'Benefit Guides,' relied on by participants during enrollment, failed to include clear instructions to access the cessation program." [Trout v. Meijer, Inc., No. 25-1378 (W.D. Mich. complaint filed Nov. 5, 2025)]  MORE >>

ArentFox Schiff LLP

Employer Must Investigate Possible FMLA Leave Request

"the Appeals Court ruled that the employee offered enough evidence to create a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether his wife needed care, a qualifying reason for leave under the FMLA, and whether the employer had sufficient notice. 'Requiring ironclad proof is more than summary judgment requires, and in a situation like this one, it would allow an employer to benefit from its failure to comply with the FMLA.' " [James v. FedEx Freight, Inc., No. 24-12907 (11th Cir. Nov. 7, 2025)]  MORE >>

The Wagner Law Group

An FMLA Blindspot for Employers to Watch

"[E]mployees do not need to use 'magic words' or explicitly mention the FMLA to invoke these protections. [A] recent Eleventh Circuit decision ... illustrates this principle: notifying managers of a spouse's high-risk pregnancy and need for care may be enough to trigger an employer's FMLA obligations." [James v. FedEx Freight, Inc., No. 24-12907 (11th Cir. Nov. 7, 2025)]  MORE >>

Tucker Arensberg, P.C.

District Court Allows Pharmacy Claims that ESI Violated Arkansas PBM Law to Move Past Motion to Dismiss

"The court determined that ESI's claim that the Act applies only to consumer-oriented acts or practices is a requirement that does not appear in the statute, which was intended to govern the conduct of PBMs, pharmacies, and pharmacists. Additionally, the court found that ESI's interpretation of the statute would render the enforcement mechanism in the Act 'meaningless.' " [Lackie Drug Store, Inc. v. Express Scripts, Inc., No. 23-1669 (E.D. Mo. 2025)]  MORE >>

Reed Smith

GLP-1 Coverage in 2025: Balancing Cost and Care

"Employers are weighing affordability against outcomes, exploring pharmacy levers, and considering wraparound programs to make GLP-1 coverage sustainable.... Start by reviewing your data, engaging your carrier or PBM, and educating employees on available resources. Aim for more than offering coverage. Build a long-term strategy that supports your people and your business."  MORE >>

Sequoia

After Shutdown, Federal Employees Face New Uncertainty: Affording Health Insurance

"As the nation's largest employer-sponsored health insurance program, the FEHB Program covers more than 8.2 million federal government employees and retirees, and it was once celebrated as a national model for controlling costs while giving enrollees many health plan options. But next year, average enrollee premium payments in the system are set to jump more than 12%, on top of a 13.5% hike in 2025. The two-year increase is higher than what many private employers and their workers are experiencing."  MORE >>

KFF Health News

Benefits in General

[Guidance Overview]

Year-End Deadlines and Dates for Employee Benefit Plans

"401(k), 403(b), 457(b) plans: Automatic Roth designation for catch-up eligible participants earning over $150,000 (as adjusted for inflation) ... Group health plans: gag clause attestation."  MORE >>

Venable LLP

[Guidance Overview]

Year End Reminder: Verify ERISA Bonding Compliance

"Health, retirement and other employee benefit plan fiduciaries, sponsors and service providers should confirm and document that all plan fiduciaries, service providers and other plan workforce members are properly bonded to protect the plan against fraud and dishonesty, as well as avoid incurring liability for breaching the fiduciary responsibility requirements of [ERISA]."  MORE >>

Solutions Law Press

How AI Can Be Used in Employee Benefits

"AI can improve benefits communication by translating and simplifying content ... AI can use a combination of plan data and member input to help members choose health plans ... AI can help benefit plans become more targeted in meeting a plan member's needs ... Plan sponsors can use AI to gain better oversight of their plans ... AI's ability to sift through large amounts of data quickly is an important tool for detecting fraud, waste and abuse ... AI without appropriate oversight becomes a liability factor[.]"  MORE >>

International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans [IFEBP]

Prepping for Sale: Getting Your Employment and Benefits House in Order

"This post highlights key employment and benefits considerations to address in preparation for a sale, offering practical insights to help sellers and company management navigate the sale with confidence and efficiency. Taking these preliminary steps and anticipating buyer diligence questions can help companies present a well-managed organization, streamline the diligence process, and accelerate deal execution."  MORE >>

Mintz

Employee Benefits Jobs

💼

Enrolled Actuary

CalcAir

Remote

View job as Enrolled Actuary for CalcAir

Selected New Discussions

Failed DCFSA 55% Average Benefit Test

"We offered the new maximum DCFSA limit ($7,500), performed the test following our open enrollment period and have one HCE that elected the new maximum $7,500, that needs to be reduced in order to pass the test. My questions are: [1] Since it's possible for us to have another HCE enroll mid-year, am I correct that we have to apply the same reduction to any HCE mid-year enrollees? [2] If yes, how do we determine what the reduced amount should be? [3] Other than exclude HCEs altogether moving forward or setting a low election maximum, is there anything else I'm missing?"

BenefitsLink® Message Boards

Question About Eligibility Language

"I review a lot of plans where eligibility is written as 'Full-time employees working 30 hours per week'. To me, this raises multiple concerns: First, it doesn't account for variable hour employees of ALEs and lookback/measurement/etc. Second, and more concerning to me, is that the language is loose. If an employee hits 30 hours in one week, is that employee not then eligible? Especially if 'Full-time' is not a defined term? There has to be a better way of drafting that, right? Or am I just picking nits?"

BenefitsLink® Message Boards

Last Issue's Most Popular Items

California Enacts New Rules for PBMs

AssuredPartners

Draft of 2026 IRS Publication 15-A: Employer's Supplemental Tax Guide (PDF)

Internal Revenue Service [IRS]

District Court Confirms Only Named Plan Administrator May Face § 1132(c) Penalties

Roberts Disability Law

Unsubscribe  |   Change Email Address

Search Past Issues   |   Privacy Policy

Submit an Article   |   Contact Us   |   Advertise Here

Copyright 2025 BenefitsLink.com, Inc. All materials contained in this newsletter are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of BenefitsLink.com, Inc., or in the case of third party materials, the owner of those materials. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notices from copies of the content.

BenefitsLink® Health & Welfare Plans Newsletter, ISSN no. 1536-9595.

Links to web sites other than BenefitsLink.com and EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com are offered as a service to our readers. We are not involved in their production and are not responsible for their content.