|
Retirement Plans Newsletter
December 30, 2025
|
|
|
|
💼 New Job Opportunity Today
|
| |
|
[Guidance Overview]
Proxy Voting Back in the Spotlight: Practical Steps for Now
"Ultimately, the objective of the Executive Order is to dissuade proxy advisors from making recommendations based on DEI and
ESG initiatives. The utilization of the ERISA fiduciary statutory scheme as a tool for dissuasion has direct and significant impacts on service providers to retirement plans. From a practical perspective, service providers and fiduciaries to ERISA plans should consider the following:" MORE >>
Trucker Huss
|
|
[Guidance Overview]
Will the Trump Administration Re-'Order' 401(k) Plan 'Alternatives'? (PDF)
"This [article] provides an overview of President Trump's recent Executive Order directing regulatory agencies to take
action to enhance 401(k) plan access to such strategies, and continues by summarizing some prior history, moves on to outline concerns of plan fiduciaries and then offers some of the reasons proponents and opponents have concerning alternative assets in 401(k) plans." MORE >>
Dechert LLP in The Investment Lawyer
|
|
Why 2025 Was a Breakout Year for Auto Portability
"Key developments include: [1] Rapid growth in auto portability adoption. [2] Public support for auto portability from leading DC recordkeepers. [3] A reframing by industry thought leaders of the 'forgotten' 401(k) accounts issue through the lens of
portability." MORE >>
401(k) Specialist
|
|
DOL Declines to Defend Fiduciary Investment Advice Rule But May Target Proxy Advisors
"Proxy advisors who provide recommendations and analysis to shareholders (including ERISA plan fiduciaries) regarding how to vote proxies on corporate matters may not fit neatly within the traditional fiduciary framework. However, the Executive Order directs the DOL to consider whether proxy advisors to ERISA plans should be ERISA fiduciaries because of their 'relationship of trust and confidence' with their clients." MORE >>
Kilpatrick Townsend
|
|
Who Claims Social Security While They Are Still Working – and Why?
"43 percent of individuals interviewed between ages 56-75 combined work and benefits for at least some period of time ... [T]wo-thirds of them claimed before the FRA -- typically right at age 62 -- while another 30 percent claimed between the FRA and age
69 -- typically right at the FRA. This pattern suggests different circumstances and different reasons for claiming." MORE >>
Alicia H. Munnell, Center for Retirement Research [CRR] at Boston College
|
|
Americans Lose Out Due to Limited Financial Literacy
"Data from the National Financial Educators Council (NFEC) found that participants say they lose out on $948 from their lack of personal finance knowledge, for a combined total of $246 billion in lost revenue. Further, close to half (48.6%) of survey respondents say that an
inadequacy of their own financial prowess had led to losses of $500, while 14.6% report setbacks of $2,500." MORE >>
401(k) Specialist
|
|
As a Higher Earner, Should You Still Make Catch-Up Contributions to Your 401(k)?
"If you're running behind on retirement savings, you'll probably want to contribute the extra amount, even though there's not a current tax advantage.... A person who is currently age 50 and maxes out on both catch-up and super catch-up contributions could therefore
end up with something in the neighborhood of $200,000 (assuming a 5% annual return) in the Roth 401(k) by age 65. And because contribution limits are adjusted for inflation each year, the total would likely be higher than that." MORE >>
Morningstar
|
|
[Opinion]
General Account and Separate Account Products Are ERISA Prohibited Transactions; Diversified Synthetic Stable Value Is Not
"For more than 30 years, 'stable value' has been marketed to retirement plan fiduciaries as a conservative, low-risk, bond-like option. That description is only accurate for one form of stable value: diversified synthetic stable value. General Account (GA) and Separate
Account (SA) stable value products are fundamentally different. They embed insurance spread products, opaque crediting decisions, and conflicted compensation structures that directly collide with ERISA's duties of loyalty, prudence, and prohibited-transaction rules." MORE >>
The Commonsense 401(k) Project
|
Benefits in General |
|
[Official Guidance]
Text of EBSA Notice: Changes to Delinquent Filer Voluntary Compliance Program
"Following a review of the DFVC Program, as modified in 2002 and 2013, the Department has determined to expand the penalty relief to plan MEWAs, non-plan MEWAs, and ECEs who are required to file the Form M-1.... The Department, to encourage voluntary compliance with ERISA's reporting requirements, is extending to plan and non-plan MEWAs and ECEs that are required to file Form M-1 the same $750 maximum penalty amount currently available to small plans filing a late Form 5500, and to filers of apprenticeship and training plans and top hat plans. In addition, top hat and apprenticeship plans
will no longer be directed to the DFVC payment calculator. All plans eligible to pay a flat $750 fee will follow a link to a gov.pay site.... The DFVC Program described herein shall be effective December 19, 2025." MORE >>
Employee Benefits Security Administration [EBSA], U.S. Department of Labor [DOL]
|
|
[Official Guidance]
Text of IRS Notice 2026-10: 2026 Standard Mileage Rates (PDF)
"The standard mileage rate for transportation or travel expenses for 2026 is 72.5 cents per mile for all miles of business use (business standard mileage rate) ... The standard mileage rate is 14 cents per mile for use of an automobile in rendering gratuitous services to a
charitable organization under Section 170.... The standard mileage rate for 2026 is 20.5 cents per mile for use of an automobile: [1] for medical care described in Section 213; or [2] as part of a move for which the expenses are deductible under Section 217(g)." MORE >>
Internal Revenue Service [IRS]
|
|
Employee Benefits Jobs
|
|
|
|
|
Selected New Discussions |
|
Last Date to Change SH Match to SH Nonelective
"It appears that I have until 12/31/2025 to amend a 401(k) Plan for the 2026 Plan Year regarding the Safe Harbor Match. However, I cannot find anything that specifically states that the Amendment can change the Safe Harbor Method from a SH Match to the SH Nonelective. Is this
allowed? The client has already distributed the SH Notice to the Participants stating that the Plan will provide the basic SH Match for 2026. If the 401(k) gurus out there believe I can amend the Plan, then I will prepare a new Notice stating that the Plan will be providing the SH Nonelective rather than the Match."
BenefitsLink® Message Boards
|
|
|
Press Releases |
|
Wellness Workdays Launches BRAVE: A Frontline Mental Health Program Built Specifically for the Construction Industry
Wellness Workdays
|
|
|
Webinars, Podcasts and Conferences (Retirement Plans / Executive Compensation) |
|
The AI Workplace: The Rules, the Risks and the Reality
January 21, 2026 in NY
Davis+Gilbert LLP
|
|
MEPs vs. Standalone Plans: Consultant’s Strategic Guide
February 2, 2026 WEBINAR
ASPPA [American Society of Pension Professionals & Actuaries]
|
|
|
Last Issue's Most Popular Items |
|
Exposé on Chicago Teachers Provides a Case Study in Pension Consultant Capture
The Commonsense 401(k) Project
|
|
Missing RMDs Cost Investors $1.7B in Penalties in 2024
PLANADVISER
|
|
Retirement Plan Features to Prioritize in 2026
401(k) Specialist
|
|
Unsubscribe |
Change Email Address
Search Past Issues |
Privacy Policy
Submit an Article |
Contact Us |
Advertise Here
Copyright 2025 BenefitsLink.com, Inc. All materials contained in this newsletter are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of BenefitsLink.com, Inc., or in the case of third party materials, the owner of those materials. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notices from copies of the content.
BenefitsLink® Retirement Plans Newsletter, ISSN no. 1536-9587.
Links to web sites other than BenefitsLink.com and EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com are offered as a service to our readers. We are not involved in their production and are not responsible for their content.
|