|
Retirement Plans Newsletter
February 2, 2026
|
|
|
|
💼 New Job Opportunity Today
|
| |
|
[Guidance Overview]
FASB Clarifies Accounting Treatment for Market-Based Cash Balance Plans
"[FASB] approved the recommendation of its Emerging Issues Task Force earlier this month that benefits for market-based cash balance plans, which are legally classified as defined benefit plans, be valued by setting the discount rate equal to the assumed interest crediting
rate.... [T]he proposed new accounting calculation would make it simpler and more sensible for plan sponsors to estimate their market-based cash balance pension obligations." MORE >>
PLANSPONSOR; registration may be required
|
|
[Guidance Overview]
IRS Modifies Language in the Safe Harbor Special Tax Notice
"The IRS and Treasury Department encourage plans to customize a safe harbor explanation by omitting any information that does not apply to the plan. This article highlights the changes that qualified governmental plans should consider making to their Special Tax
Notices." MORE >>
Ice Miller LLP
|
|
DOL Files Amicus Brief Clarifying Fiduciary Use of Forfeited Funds Under ERISA
"[T]he department argues that the district court correctly held that the plan sponsor did not breach its fiduciary duties of prudence and loyalty because the plaintiff's argument only included a bare allegation that forfeitures were not allocated to pay plan expenses, even
though the plan at issue provided for fiduciary discretion over that decision. Instead, the brief explains how a prudent and loyal fiduciary might have concluded that it was important to ensure that plan participants received the contributions expressly promised by the plan in a timely
manner." [Barragan v. Honeywell Int'l, Inc., No. 24-4529 (D.N.J. Aug. 18, 2025; on appeal to 3d Cir. No. 25-2509)] MORE >>
Employee Benefits Security Administration [EBSA], U.S. Department of Labor [DOL]
|
|
Ex-Labor Officials Contest Administration's Pro-Employer ERISA Campaign
"The [DOL's amicus brief], which argued the Lockheed retirees lack standing to challenge the company's pension
de-risking transaction, is inconsistent with [ERISA] and would undermine the statute's standards by 'insulating fiduciary conduct from review precisely when judicial oversight is most needed,' Phyllis Borzi and Ali Khawar told the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in a Jan. 30 amicus brief backing the Lockheed workers." [Konya v. Lockheed Martin Corp., No. 24-0750 (D. Md. Mar. 28, 2025; on appeal to 4th Cir. No. 25-2061)] MORE >>
Bloomberg Law
|
|
Alternative Investments in Defined Contribution Plans: Potential Implications for Plan Sponsors and Participants (PDF)
"The industry will likely see a multi-pronged approach to developing alternative investment solutions for the DC Plan marketplace. Plan sponsors contemplating a move into alternatives should expect to see iterations of popular asset allocation strategies such as target-date and
target-risk funds coming to market with alternative investment exposures already embedded[.]" MORE >>
Gallagher
|
|
Upward Trend in Privately-Held ESOPs Continues
"In the last five filing years, the number of ESOPs at privately-held companies has been trending upward. During the same period, the number of ESOPs at publicly-held companies has decreased by 18%. The number of active participants at all ESOPs has grown by 781,872, with most of
that coming from privately-held ESOPs." MORE >>
National Center for Employee Ownership [NCEO]
|
|
Can Your Artwork Collection Fund Your Spending in Retirement?
"Many households have complicated financial situations and may own properties, businesses, collectibles and other assets that they would like to use for retirement, but these assets may not be easily valued or artificially 'converted' into income. If you have any of these
types of assets, you may wish to ... use the Actuarial Financial Planner workbooks to value your hard-to-value assets and include them in your Funded Status calculation." MORE >>
Ken Steiner, FSA Retired
|
|
[Opinion]
Pension Rights Center Amicus Brief Supporting Participants' Standing to Challenge Lockheed PRT (PDF)
"The standing doctrine advocated by Lockheed is inapplicable to the circumstances here and would license Lockheed or any other plan sponsor to select almost any insurer not in immediate danger of failing in the near future, even those with lower ratings and riskier business
models than Athene. And ... with annuity contracts the future can extend for many decades." [Konya v. Lockheed Martin Corp., No. 24-0750 (D. Md. Mar. 28, 2025; on appeal to 4th Cir. No. 25-2061)] MORE >>
Pension Rights Center and National Retiree Legislative Network
|
|
[Opinion]
Push to Include Crypto and Private Equity in 401(k)s Endangers Retirement Savers and the Economy
"Some retirement savers might experience life-altering losses if retirement plan sponsors and advisers steer them into risky and hard-to-value investments like private equity and cryptocurrencies....[P]rivately traded investments ... may be difficult to sell when workers are
ready for retirement and digital collectibles ... have no intrinsic value ... Marketing risky investments to millions of retirement plan participants is a way to bail out billionaires at the expense of ordinary savers ... A speculative bubble like the one in the roaring 1920s might grow and lead to a crash with economywide repercussions." MORE >>
Economic Policy Institute [EPI]
|
|
[Opinion]
CB/PS Combo Plan Trick, Part 2
"[T]he numerator of the EBAR ... is the benefit projected to retirement age divided by current year compensation. ... [T]he compensation amount in the denominator should logically be projected as well with a salary scale which would make sense mathematically but would also lower
the EBARs for younger participants with more years to go to retirement thus requiring them to get larger contributions to raise their EBARs and pass testing, something the law writers and interpreters of 401(a)(4) did not seem to want." MORE >>
Burypensions Blog
|
Benefits in General |
|
EBSA Restores Nearly $1.4 Billion to Employee Benefit Plans, Participants, and Beneficiaries in FY 2025
"In FY 2025, EBSA closed 878 civil investigations. Of those, 556 investigations (63 percent) produced monetary results for plans or other corrective action, for a total of $714.4 million recovered.... In FY 2025, [EBSA] obtained 297 non-monetary civil corrections,
including: [1] removing 15 fiduciaries, [2] barring 24 individuals from serving as fiduciaries, [3] appointing 18 fiduciaries, [4] improving missing participant procedures for 49 plans, and [5] implementing 61 global corrections across multiple ERISA-covered health plans." MORE >>
Employee Benefits Security Administration [EBSA], U.S. Department of Labor [DOL]
|
Executive Compensation and Nonqualified Plans |
|
[Guidance Overview]
Executive Order Seeks to Limit Stock Buy Backs and Executive Compensation for Underperforming Defense Contractors
"[EO 14372] directs the Secretary to ensure
contracts and contract renewals executed after March 8, 2026, contain a new clause aligned with the EO. Contractors subject to the new clause must have executive incentive compensation plans that reward on time deliveries and investments in production capacity rather than achievement of short-term financial metrics. If the DoW determines ... that a contractor does not sufficiently prioritize, invest in or establish acceptable
production rates, contractor compensation and executive incentive plans will be scrutinized." MORE >>
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
|
|
Employee Benefits Jobs
|
|
|
|
|
Selected New Discussions |
|
Can Husband / Wife with Separate Businesses (No Employees) Set Up 1 Plan
"Wife has an LLC with no employees. Husband has an LLC with no employees. Both own 100% of their own LLCs. The Wife's LLC pays the Husband's LLC. It is not clear if the Husband has any other source of income in his LLC. They both would like to set up a solo 401k plan. Do
they need 2 separate plans or could both LLCs adopt the plan and only set up one plan?"
BenefitsLink® Message Boards
|
|
Different Definition of Compensation for Deferral and Match Contribution
"I'd like to get the group's opinion on how the Actual Deferral Rate is calculated in a 401(k) Plan has a discretionary matching formula of 50% up to 10%, when different exclusions apply for match than for deferrals, defined below. We have a differing of opinions on how
the match should be calculated. Method #1 calculates the ADR based on deferrals and plan comp for deferrals. Method #2 calculates the ADR on deferrals and plan comp for match. Method #2 produces a higher% which increases the match amount but doesn't exceed the maximum match available based on 5% of match comp.... I understand the testing implications (ACP, 414(s), BRF) are separate
issues here."
BenefitsLink® Message Boards
|
|
|
Press Releases |
|
Stephen J. Small Joins the Wagner Law Group's Boston Office
The Wagner Law Group P.C.
|
|
|
Last Issue's Most Popular Items |
|
New Executive Order Targets Proxy Advisory Firms: Key ERISA Implications
Winston & Strawn LLP
|
|
Bloomberg Hit With $70M ERISA Lawsuit Over 401(k) Fund Lineup
401(k) Specialist
|
|
DOL Amicus Briefs Support Curbing Wave of ERISA Litigation
Winston & Strawn LLP
|
|
Unsubscribe |
Change Email Address
Search Past Issues |
Privacy Policy
Submit an Article |
Contact Us |
Advertise Here
Copyright 2026 BenefitsLink.com, Inc. All materials contained in this newsletter are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of BenefitsLink.com, Inc., or in the case of third party materials, the owner of those materials. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notices from copies of the content.
BenefitsLink® Retirement Plans Newsletter, ISSN no. 1536-9587.
Links to web sites other than BenefitsLink.com and EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com are offered as a service to our readers. We are not involved in their production and are not responsible for their content.
|