Get This Daily Newsletter by Email

Retirement Plans Newsletter

March 20, 2026

BenefitsLink.com logo
EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com logo

💼  3 New Job Opportunities

 

[Guidance Overview]

IRS Postpones Effective Date of Certain RMD Regs

"[P]lan sponsors may wish to use the additional time provided by the delay to coordinate with recordkeepers on system readiness to implement any required or desired changes to address the Delayed RMD Regulatory Provisions. Plan sponsors should also document interim administrative positions to support reliance on the good-faith compliance standard[.]"  MORE >>

Morgan Lewis

[Guidance Overview]

PBGC Relaunches Opinion Letter Program

"The Program is open to employers, plan sponsors, unions, and supporting practitioners (like lawyers and actuaries).... Submissions to the Program are made electronically.... The Program also includes a searchable database that will serve as a public repository of opinion letters issued by the Office of the General Counsel from 1974 to date."  MORE >>

Snell & Wilmer

[Guidance Overview]

SEC Issues Landmark Digital Asset Guidance

"For businesses operating in or adjacent to the digital asset space, this guidance fundamentally changes the regulatory landscape. The 'regulation by enforcement' era appears to be over, replaced with clear taxonomies and defined pathways for compliance.... The heart of the SEC's interpretation is a five-category classification system for crypto assets."  MORE >>

Fox Rothschild LLP

Don't Just Sign Your New Adoption Agreement or Amendment

"Recordkeepers tend to do a good job preserving the design of customers' retirement plans during restatement and other update processes. But mistakes do occur, and the significant number of changes being made as part of the CARES/SECURE restatement process may increase the risk of unintended changes to the written terms of the plan.... [P]lan document updates provide an excellent opportunity to reaffirm that the employer's administrative practices are aligned with the written terms of the plan document."  MORE >>

Verrill Dana LLP

Retirement Plan Options for Public Employers

"This article provides a high-level overview of the most common retirement plan structures used by governmental employers, including defined benefit pension plans, 457(b) deferred compensation plans, 401(a) defined contribution plans, and hybrid approaches that combine elements of these structures."  MORE >>

FosterSwift

Fidelity Study Finds 'Retirement Age' No Longer Integral to Late-Career Plans

"72% of responding pre-retirees expected to retire on their own terms, up 5 percentage points from last year.... Respondents from younger generations were particularly open to alternative paths ... Overall, 34% of pre-retirees expected to reduce their hours before retiring, 30% expected to take on fewer responsibilities, and 18% expected to move into freelance or contract work. "  MORE >>

PLANADVISER

Benefits in General

How Private Equity Is Reshaping the Benefits and Retirement Landscape

"Over the past decade, private equity has significantly accelerated consolidation across the retirement and benefits industries.... For plan sponsors, the key takeaway is not to avoid PE-backed firms -- but to ensure that evaluation processes remain objective, transparent, and well documented."  MORE >>

Culpepper RFP

Employee Benefits Jobs

💼

Relationship Manager - DC

Daybright Financial

Remote

View job as Relationship Manager - DC for Daybright Financial

💼

Employee Benefits Associate Attorney

Mondress Monaco Parr Lockwood PLLC

Seattle WA

View job as Employee Benefits Associate Attorney for Mondress Monaco Parr Lockwood PLLC

💼

Training Administrator

Employee Benefits Security Administration [EBSA]

DC / Hybrid

View job as Training Administrator for Employee Benefits Security Administration [EBSA]

Selected New Discussions

Designating Excess Deferrals in Multiple Plans (402(g) Limit)

"An individual worked for 2 unrelated employers in 2025 and deferred into separate 401k plans. They deferred $15,000 into Plan A and $15,000 into Plan B. They are not catch-up eligible and they need a 402g refund of $6,500. Based on what I am seeing in the regs, the individual ultimately determines which plan holds the excess. If you go by the last-in, first-out method -- Plan B would issue the refund. But, Plan B has a very generous match and the individual would have to forfeit some of his match if the refund comes from Plan B. Can the individual choose Plan A as holding the excess? Or, can they designate a portion of the excess from Plan A and a portion from Plan B? For example, can they request $3,000 to be refunded from Plan A and $3,500 refunded from Plan B?"

BenefitsLink® Message Boards

Last Issue's Most Popular Items

DOL Restores ERISA 5-Part Test After Fiduciary Rule Is Vacated

401(k) Specialist

The New York Secure Choice Registration Deadlines Are Fast Approaching

Jackson Lewis P.C.

New York State Mandatory Auto-IRA Program

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

Unsubscribe  |   Change Email Address

Search Past Issues   |   Privacy Policy

Submit an Article   |   Contact Us   |   Advertise Here

Copyright 2026 BenefitsLink.com, Inc. All materials contained in this newsletter are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of BenefitsLink.com, Inc., or in the case of third party materials, the owner of those materials. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notices from copies of the content.

BenefitsLink® Retirement Plans Newsletter, ISSN no. 1536-9587.

Links to web sites other than BenefitsLink.com and EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com are offered as a service to our readers. We are not involved in their production and are not responsible for their content.